FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-28-2007, 04:26 PM   #31
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: USA, Missouri
Posts: 3,070
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Malachi151 View Post
This doesn't work. I'll just take one example:

#2 The Mystery Revealed

http://mypeoplepc.com/members/tedrik...top20/id5.html

Your apology does not work, here is why:

#1) Not every use of the term mystery in the letters of Paul refers to the same thing, as you claim. For example:
I agree, and that's why I didn't use your example.



Quote:
#2) In order to make your point and claim to clarify what Paul is talking about you quote Ephesians, but Ephesians is pseudo-Paul, and therefor can't be used to clarify Paul's intention, because we don't know if Ephesians reflects Paul's intentions.
I explained that I included it because Doherty included it in his argument about Paul's intentions. My case didn't rest on this passage alone though.


Quote:
#3) Even assuming that the mystery is not Christ himself, it would be equally strange to claim that "the mystery" of God was revealed in some manner other than by Jesus himself when he was on earth preaching to proclaim his message.

Let's just assume for sake of argument that Romans 16 is calling the fact that the Gentiles can be saved "the mystery".

Still, Paul says that "the mystery" is revealed to the prophets and apostles through scripture and revelation. Wouldn't "the mystery" have been revealed BY JESUS?!
If it wasn't, it wasn't. This last point of yours simply cannot be used as an argument against Jesus' existence, because he could have existed and not revealed the 'mystery' Paul preached.

ted
TedM is offline  
Old 03-28-2007, 09:41 PM   #32
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: USA, Missouri
Posts: 3,070
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DougShaver
It makes sense to me, and I have an article on my Web site explaining why: http://dougshaver.com/christ/ahistor/ahistor1.
For some reason I decided to review your article closely, and have responded in a new thread entitled Review of "Was there a real Jesus". I've sent you a pm also, and am posting this here for others in the thread.

ted
TedM is offline  
Old 03-29-2007, 08:13 AM   #33
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Bernardino, Calif.
Posts: 5,435
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TedM View Post
Only if you want to Doug.
Thanks. I do want to.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TedM View Post
Huffman took on #1, and Vork took on the Judas one. Doherty also addressed a few things. I was not persuaded much.
I don't debate to persuade my opponents. I debate to enlighten the audience.
Doug Shaver is offline  
Old 03-29-2007, 09:26 AM   #34
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Colorado
Posts: 8,674
Default

Solo, Philippians 2:5-11 is a hymn.

At best Paul wrote it, which is doubtful, more likely Paul either copied this hymn in from another source himself, or it is a later interpolation.

You can't claim that ideas only found in this hymn represent a "theological development" of Paul.

What is so striking about this hymn is the fact that none of these ideas are reflected in any of the other writings of Paul.

Even assuming Paul wrote it, a hymn isn't the format for developing a theological argument of laying out doctrines.
Malachi151 is offline  
Old 03-29-2007, 10:59 AM   #35
Contributor
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Cylon Occupied Texas, but a Michigander @ heart
Posts: 10,326
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TedM View Post
Which to me doesn't make any sense. If this "Christ" were not a man why not talk about what he was and when he "lived" what all of the -earthlike references to him really meant? It makes little sense to me to refer to him in a mysterious way without discussing the mystery if it isn't what everyone and his brother would assume unless told otherwise.
Was there a real John Frum?

John Frum cult:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Frum

A unique modern day comparison of how a cult forms.
Gawen is offline  
Old 03-29-2007, 01:34 PM   #36
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 2,579
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Malachi151 View Post
Solo, Philippians 2:5-11 is a hymn.
Thank you very much; I would have never guessed

Quote:
You can't claim that ideas only found in this hymn represent a "theological development" of Paul.
I did not say that and I did not even speak of Paul's "theological development". Do you know what the word "schema" means ?

Quote:
What is so striking about this hymn is the fact that none of these ideas are reflected in any of the other writings of Paul.
Nonsense. Some of the steps in the schema do not touch on the hymn and where they do I provided some parallels to other epistles. The schema is not derived from or dependent on the Carmen in any way (except in the "hyper-exalted" name, which may well be from a later version of the hymn,....but I am not hung up on it since it is not critical step in the setup).

[Christ in the form of God] ->[sent to earth to repudiate sin=flesh]

Rom 8:3 : For God has done what the law, weakened by the flesh, could not do: sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh and for sin, he condemned sin in the flesh,

The formula "sent his own Son" (ton heautou huion pempsas) is dependent on the notion of pre-existence. If you accept that Paul's God was not procreating, 1 Cr 8:6 complements Phl 2:6 as well.

[born of a woman, in flesh]

Gal 4:4......you still owe me evidence that Paul said the woman was "Israel in heaven"

[obediently fulfils his destiny to be God's servant in flesh, is humiliated through weakness of flesh, but faithfully fulfils his earthly mission]

provided 2 Cr 13:4, and further

Rom 3:22 Even the righteousness of God by faith of Jesus Christ.....

....read with:

Rom 8:8 .....and those who are in the flesh cannot please God, [which means Jesus too]

and

1 Cr 1:28 ......but God chose what is low and despised in the world [i.e. that which is hanging on the Cross], even things that are not, to bring to nothing things that are....

Gal 3:13 Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law, having become a curse for us--for it is written, "Cursed be every one who hangs on a tree"--

[his flesh is mortified in crucifixion]

as I said, Paul provides this point through imitatio-Christi as in Rom 6:5,

compare with,

Rom 8:13 for if you live according to the flesh you will die, but if by the Spirit you mortify the deeds of the body you will live.

[is resurrected in an imperishable, glorious body]

1 Cr 15:42-58

->[becomes man of heaven who will meet with followers at the last trumpet]

the "becoming" a man of heaven (or Paul's Christ as the transformee/ transformer of a physical body into the spiritual one) is captured this way:

1 Cr 15:44-46 It is sown a physical body, it is raised a spiritual body. If there is a physical body, there is also a spiritual body. Thus it is written, "The first man Adam became a living being"; the last Adam became a life-giving spirit. But it is not the spiritual which is first but the physical, and then the spiritual.

Jiri
Solo is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:26 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.