FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Science & Skepticism > Science Discussions
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-28-2004, 04:36 PM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Dancing
Posts: 9,940
Default pre-big bang?

Can someone explain what existance was like before the big bang?
show_no_mercy is offline  
Old 10-28-2004, 04:39 PM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Anywhere but Colorado, including non-profits
Posts: 8,787
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by show_no_mercy
Can someone explain what existance was like before the big bang?
You have to define "before" the big bang first. According to most modern theories of cosmology, time itself only goes back as far as the big bang. Therefore no "before."

Some theories have the universe bubbling off from some other structure that has some kind of supra-time or something, but that's as maybe.
epepke is offline  
Old 10-28-2004, 05:17 PM   #3
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 74
Default

Theres also the idea of time being bounded in infinite curvature.
Stephen Hawkings Imaginary Time axis.

In this case, time being like a globe, would not have a start or finish.
The North Pole on a 2d map may appear like an unpassable singularity stretched wide from left to right, but on a globe its just another ordinary spot.
Milky is offline  
Old 10-28-2004, 05:23 PM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Anywhere but Colorado, including non-profits
Posts: 8,787
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Milky
Theres also the idea of time being bounded in infinite curvature.
Stephen Hawkings Imaginary Time axis.
Yeah. I think I wrote about that within the past hour, but I can't remember where. The trouble is, where/into what dimensions does it go? Spacetime is already reasonably defined as a quaternion, and you can't just stick on an extra dimension because it would make it not work in an algebra any more. So there would have to be some transformation into an octonion, a sedenion, or that thing with 32 numbers I can never remember the name of.
epepke is offline  
Old 10-28-2004, 07:03 PM   #5
Contributor
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Alaska!
Posts: 14,058
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by epepke
Yeah. I think I wrote about that within the past hour, but I can't remember where.
http://www.iidb.org/vbb/showthread.php?t=103407
Wiploc is offline  
Old 10-28-2004, 07:15 PM   #6
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 4,197
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by show_no_mercy
Can someone explain what existance was like before the big bang?
No.
Godless Wonder is offline  
Old 10-28-2004, 07:19 PM   #7
Moderator - Science Discussions
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Providence, RI, USA
Posts: 9,908
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by epepke
Spacetime is already reasonably defined as a quaternion, and you can't just stick on an extra dimension because it would make it not work in an algebra any more.
What theory of physics defines spacetime as a quaternion?
Jesse is offline  
Old 10-29-2004, 06:27 AM   #8
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: London
Posts: 1,376
Default

There's also the theory that the Big Bang was actually proceeded by the Universe crumbling in on itself and then going Bang. An eternal cycle of in and out. But this still doesn't address the problem of the begining.
Rudolph is offline  
Old 10-29-2004, 07:44 AM   #9
Obsessed Contributor
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 61,538
Default ...

it's turtles all the way down!!!
premjan is offline  
Old 10-29-2004, 08:28 AM   #10
Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: ---
Posts: 10,496
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rudolph
There's also the theory that the Big Bang was actually proceeded by the Universe crumbling in on itself and then going Bang. An eternal cycle of in and out. But this still doesn't address the problem of the begining.
That is true. All it does is explain one theory on what the process currently is. The theory says nothing about what set the cycle off initially. I do hope humanity finds the answer eventually. There are still quite a number of gaps in our understanding of how the universe works. I just we spent as much time in unraveling those mysteries as we do in endeavoring to find new an more efficient ways to kill people. I once remember hearing about the US researching ways to develop matter-antimatter explosives. As if having nuclear weapons aren't enough. It's not enough that we have the ability to lay waste to destroy nations. No! We need to find ways to destroy planets (potentially at least, I can't even begin to imagine what a one megaton matter - antimatter warhead's explosive yield would be).
:banghead:
MonCapitan2002 is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:40 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.