Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
05-06-2004, 01:20 AM | #131 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: ""
Posts: 3,863
|
Quote:
Now that we have addressed Quadratus and Melito (thanks btw, I didn't think of the dating of Melito's works), are we in agreement that Doherty's argument concerning second century apologists is sound and complete? I am glad you are conforming to the 180 CE cutoff. Also, conform to the "defense of Christianity to the pagans" clause and all will be well. If we are not in agreement that Doherty's case is secure, whats the new argument? |
|
05-06-2004, 02:15 AM | #132 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: ""
Posts: 3,863
|
Quote:
I think it can be argued. |
|
05-06-2004, 03:27 AM | #133 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 5,714
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|