Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
07-11-2007, 08:20 AM | #91 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Utah
Posts: 223
|
Citation error SIC
POWELL:
You're welcome. BTW, they erred as to their Josephus reference. It was section 20, not section 26. In English "20, 6" sounds like "26". Quote:
|
|
07-16-2007, 10:34 AM | #92 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Birmingham UK
Posts: 4,876
|
Quote:
http://www.earlychristianwritings.co...c-mrjames.html http://www.earlychristianwritings.co...b-mrjames.html These references are obviously derived from the canonical gospels. Andrew Criddle |
|
03-11-2008, 10:45 AM | #93 | |
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 1
|
Quote:
Hello everybody. I'm new here and not that knowledgeable but I have something here which I stumbled upon recently. I was doing some research on Nazareth/Nazara in Matthew 2:23 and John 1:43-50. Matthew definitely says that it had been spoken by the prophets and John also has Philip saying that Jesus of Nazareth was the one of whom both Moses (Torah) and the prophets had spoken. The story in John also has Nathaniel at first doubting but then immediately and totally convinced that Jesus was the Son of God. I asked myself, what would convince Nathaniel so quickly that this was the Son of God, and not just another Jewish zealot. The answer of course is in what Jesus had said to him when Philip had introduced him to Jesus, where Jesus had described what Nathaniel was doing and that he was under the fig tree, etc, before Nathaniel had met Jesus. Jesus had shown to Nathaniel something that only God could have known, a hidden truth. But there's more. Philip had said to Nathaniel, this is the one who had been spoken of by Moses and the Prophets, Jesus of Nazareth. I went looking for Nazareth in the Old Testament. And found one not recorded in your above quote. It's in the Dead Sea Scrolls, Isaiah 48:6. But it does not seem to have anything to do with a place name. And the equivalent verse in the Bible and Septuagint, use the words "hidden things" in its place. In fact, the surrounding verses and it, have to do with God revealing hidden things to Israel before they happen so that Israel would know that it was indeed Yahweh who was their God and not some idol. Only the true God could be identified as having anything to do with "the truth" or "hidden things" that might be revealed. My theory is this. Philip wasn't talking about any place called Nazareth. What immediately convinced Nathaniel that Jesus was the Son of God was the fact that He displayed a quality that only God has, the knower of "hidden things". Nathaniel at first responds, "Can any good thing come out of Nazareth?" Was he referring to a town called Nazareth? Or was he saying, Can any good thing come out of "a hidden thing" that was revealed, in this case by Philip. In other words, he isn't going to believe anything anyone says unless it's proven. Then along comes Jesus who does exactly that. Interestingly, Nazara is found once in the apochrophal Gospel of Phillip where it is defined as "truth". just some thoughts... |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|