FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Non Abrahamic Religions & Philosophies
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-29-2004, 07:04 PM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: England
Posts: 5,629
Default Distortion of Hitler to make him anti-Christian?

http://answers.org/apologetics/hitquote.html quotes Hitler as follows supposedy from 13th December, 1941 :-
Christianity is an invention of sick brains: one could imagine nothing more senseless, nor any more indecent way of turning the idea of the Godhead into a mockery....

Here is the German :-
Das Christentum lehrt das Verwandlung, das ist das Tollste, was je ein Menschengehirn in seinem Wahn hervorgebracht hat, eine Verhoenung von allem Gottlichen.

A translation could be 'Christianity teaches Transubstantiation, the maddest thing a sick brain could bring forward ,a mockery of the Godhead'

Notice that Hitler is not attacking Christianity at all. He is just attacking one Christian doctrine - a doctrine that many Christians themselves disagree with.

Christians often 'quote' an entry for 27th February, 1942, midday:


'It would always be disagreeable for me to go down to posterity as a man who made concessions in this field. I realize that man, in his imperfection, can commit innumerable errors-- but to devote myself deliberately to errors, that is something I cannot do. I shall never come personally to terms with the Christian lie. Our epoch in the next 200 years will certainly see the end of the disease of Christianity.... My regret will have been that I couldn't... behold ."

Here is the German for the relevant sentences
'Die Zeit, in der wir leben, ist die Erscheinung des Zusammenbruchs dieser Sache. Es kann 100 oder 200 Jahre dauern.'

Translation 'The time in which we live is the appearance of the breakdown of this concept. It can take 100 or 200 years.'

No mention of any Christian disease in the German. Iy just is not there! The concept which is breaking down is Hitler's own violent persual of his ideas, which he regarded as a temporary phase , until he had beaten everybody.

I wonder why Christians never give the actual German they are supposedly translating.

Almost as though they are deliberately altering the words to make them anti-Christian.


'It would always be disagreeable for me to go down to posterity as a man who made concessions in this field. I realize that man, in his imperfection, can commit innumerable errors-- but to devote myself deliberately to errors, that is something I cannot do. I shall never come personally to terms with the Christian lie.'

This is the Christian version of what Hitler is supposed to have said.
I now have found the German.

'Ich weiss, dass der Mensch in seiner Fehlerhaftigkeit tausend Dinge falsch machen wird. Aber entgegen dem eigenen Wissen etwas falsch tun, das kommt nicht in Frage! Man darf sich persoenlich einer solchen Luege niemals fuegen.'

Translation 'I realize that man, in his imperfection, can commit a thousand errors. But to do something wrong against one's own knowledge - that is out of the question! One should never personally accept such a lie.'

Notice that there is nothing whatever in the German about a Christian lie. The word 'Christian' just does not appear.
Steven Carr is offline  
Old 01-29-2004, 07:48 PM   #2
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 488
Default

Well, I suppose a real Christian would say Hitler was anti-Christian. I mean the guy was pretty bad. Yet he did believe himself to be a true Christian as far as I know.
Speedy-Lube is offline  
Old 01-29-2004, 07:49 PM   #3
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

The first quote is from Hitler's Table Talk. I thought that source was considered pretty unreliable to start out with - it is Hitler's secretary's recollections of what Hitler said, passed down through various channels.

Richard Carrier includes it in his On the Trail of Bogus Quotes. He also discusses a lot of translation problems and documentary problems that strangely resemble Biblical textual problems. Carrier blames the problems on one Fran�ois Genoud, whose translation H.R. Trevor-Roper relied on:

Quote:
But the real culprit is Fran�ois Genoud. David Irving tells how Genoud attempted to hoax him in the 1970s with a forgery of "Hitler's Last Testament."[7] Genoud even confessed the forgery to Irving, declaring in his defense, "But it's just what Hitler would have said, isn't it?" He was evidently willing to perpetrate a hoax, thinking it permissible to fabricate the words of Hitler if it was what he believed Hitler "would have said." His motives for doctoring the Table Talk may be unfathomable. Genoud was a very strange man with a colorful history: a Swiss banker and Nazi spy who laundered money for the Third Reich, a self-professed neo-Nazi even up to his suicide in 1996 (though, stranger still, he never supported the holocaust), a voracious purchaser and profiteer of Nazi archives, and an admitted financer of terrorists.[8]

. . .

Surveying Hitler's remarks on religion in the Table Talk, Jochmann remarks that "Hitler was by no means unreligious." It is the Genoud-Trevor-Roper text that distorts this picture far beyond that, painting Hitler as a quasi-atheistic anti-Christian. It is clear that Picker and Jochmann have the correct text and Trevor-Roper's is entirely untrustworthy. Hitler was no more anti-Christian than your run-of-the-mill Protestant bigot. His Christianity was odd, surely, but so is that of many die-hard believers today.
Toto is offline  
Old 01-29-2004, 08:00 PM   #4
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Here's an additional source on the unreliability of Table Talk:

Hitler's Table Talk

Quote:
Not one of Hitler's table talk conversations were recorded or captured by audio, film, or broadcast on radio. According to H.R. Trevor-Roper, Hitler refused to admit any mechanical recorder into his room. Hitler reluctantly allowed Martin Bormann to pick stenographers (Heim, Piker) to record the conversations. It was Bormann's idea to record Hitler's thoughts in the first place. In a facsimile written after the last of Hitler's recorded table talk, Bormann wrote a directive that stated:

"Please keep these notes most carefully, as they will be of very great value in the future. I have now got Heim to make comprehensive notes as a basis for these minutes. Any transcript which is not quite apposite will be re-checked by me." [Trevor-Roper, inset] (bold characters, mine)

"Apposite" means, fitting; suitable; appropriate. Exactly what Bormann means by "re-checked" can only be speculated upon. However, it bears importance here that neither Heim nor Bormann could hardly be in a position to determine what deems apposite, considering Bormann's biased views against Catholicism. Should we take it as simply coincidence that the church denouncements by Hitler in the Table-Talk parallel the anti-church sentiments of Martin Bormann, but nowhere else?

Martin Bormann served as the instigator, fuel, and reason for the perception of many Christians that Nazism was against Christianity. Many times, quotes attributed to Hitler are actually Bormann's. It is well known that Bormann secretly worked against the Catholic religion behind Hitler's back and without his permission. It has been pointed out that "the fight against the church organizations" were Bormann's pet project. In spite of Bormann's repeated attempts to persuade Hitler to act against the Churches, Hitler insisted that "There has been no official Party announcement, nor will there be one." [VonLang, p.191]

. . .

Moreover, Dr. Picker regarded his own recording as authentic and insisted that "no confidence can be placed in Bormann's editing of it." Indeed, he writes, rather testily, of "Bormann's alterations, not authorised by me." [Trevor-Roper, p.viii]. Unfortunately, we do not have the unaltered version of Dr. Picker's or Heim's recordings.

In other words, there are no originals and the copies were filtered and edited by Bormann. The table talk cannot be considered a first-hand recording of Hitler's words. On this fact alone, I cannot with integrity or certainty use them as a source for Hitler's voice, especially in regards to religion which could very well reflect the anti-Catholic biased Bormann.
Toto is offline  
Old 01-29-2004, 09:00 PM   #5
Amos
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Speedy-Lube
Well, I suppose a real Christian would say Hitler was anti-Christian. I mean the guy was pretty bad. Yet he did believe himself to be a true Christian as far as I know.
He was a born again Christian and therefore against Catholicism. One of the big issues always was the transubstantiation. When Jesus first said this many were upset and left (Jn.6:60-61)
 
Old 01-30-2004, 05:24 AM   #6
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 14,952
Default

Pardon my ignorance, but how the heck does this follow:

He was a born again Christian and therefore against Catholicism

???
Plognark is offline  
Old 01-30-2004, 05:38 AM   #7
Amos
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Plognark
Pardon my ignorance, but how the heck does this follow:

He was a born again Christian and therefore against Catholicism

???
Because religion leads one in the wrong direction, as it must, to make metanoia possible. When Hitler/Luther's "eyes were opened" they felt misled and deceived by the Church for not telling them the truth - which they could not see because their eyes were still closed until they opened.

This is very normal and is exactly why Jesus went to raise heck in the temple just after his awakening at the 'royal' banquet in Cana. The problem for Hitler was that his eyes were only half opened, and therefore still half closed, until he worked out his own salvation in fear and trembling (which he failed to do).
 
Old 01-30-2004, 05:47 AM   #8
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 14,952
Default

OK, i'll buy that, I suppose.
I still think Hitler was a prime example of the evil potential that religion can wreak when weilded by the mentally disturbed; little more. Luther wasn't the most stable human either. Interesting.
Plognark is offline  
Old 01-30-2004, 05:54 AM   #9
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,440
Default

I've heard those quotes before, and I never realised the twisting that happened in the translation. Thankyou, very enlightening!
liquid is offline  
Old 01-30-2004, 06:10 AM   #10
Amos
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Plognark
OK, i'll buy that, I suppose.
I still think Hitler was a prime example of the evil potential that religion can wreak when weilded by the mentally disturbed; little more. Luther wasn't the most stable human either. Interesting.
That is why "it is a fearful thing to fall in the hands of the living God." To be mentally disturbed is often the result of rebirth/enlightenment because illumination takes place in our mind.

A divine comedy and a Senecan tragedy (and you may know how gory they are) have a similar crisis moment at the beginning. The utility of this is explained in Rev. 13 with the first beast that came out of the sea and the second beast that came out of the [old] earth, to say that the first beast was reborn of God while the second beast was reborn from canal desire (Jn.1:13).
 
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:32 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.