aa5874

You have already claimed that you cannot explain your position to me.

You have no rational position that can be explained to anyone. You do not know any thing about your Jesus, you have already claimed you do not expect any evidence to be found in the NT for the historical Jesus, so you must use your imagination and assume things.

You just make assertions. Just saying Jesus did exist is an simply assertion.

Where is the evidence for your position?

Your position is based on your imagination.

Elijah

Well put Solo.

What do I need to clarify about my position for you from the explanation I gave Toto in the above post?

aa5874

Your post to Toto is just a big guess. You are just making stuff up.

Remember you have already admitted you have no-good biased information, you are just guessing.

It has already been shown that Marcion had many believers of Jesus. Marcion's Jesus was not crucified, did not die, and did not have to commit suicide.

Marcion's Jesus was made of IMAGINARY flesh, yet people believed in Marcion's Jesus.

It has already been known that it is not necessary for a human Jesus to have existed at all for the Jesus stories to have been written.

Marcion has shown that a religion can be started by making a claim about some kind of imaginary God and people would believe.

You have no rational explanation for your Jesus, you are just guessing all the time.

Elijah

So you're not understanding anything I'm saying at all?

aa5874

You have no rational explanation for your Jesus, just a load of guesses.

Marcion have already destroyed your Jesus over 1800 years ago.

Jesus was presented as imaginary. Check Marcion.

See Justin Martyr, Tertullian, Origen and Eusebius where Jesus was presented as the offspring of the Holy Ghost.

Elijah

What have I said that was not rational about my understanding of Jesus?

aa5874

Once you have already claimed that you had no-good biased information, your rational went through the window.

Elijah

So you're saying that you have no complaints with the theory itself, you're just complaining about the evidence or lack of.

aa5874

Now what good is a theory without supporting evidence or data?

As I told you long ago, people can believe anything and will believe anything, but it is a totally different matter to produce the supporting information or evidence for the theory.

I concur that Jesus was a myth because he was presented as the offspring of the Holy Ghost, born of a virgin, transfigured, resurrected and ascended, and sometime afterwards, Marcion declared Jesus to be imaginary.

I have support, I have the necessary data to support my conclusions. Jesus was a myth until credible information can be found to contradict.

What will you guess next?

Elijah

As long as you think the theory is rational then I'm not to worried about trying to get evidence because it was like 2000 years ago.