![]()  | 
	
		Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#1 | 
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Jul 2001 
				Location: the reliquary of Ockham's razor 
				
				
					Posts: 4,035
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			I don't mean in a calendrical sense, but in terms of the epochs of history.  When textbooks are written in 2100, when will they say that the twentieth century ended? 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	For example, it is standard now to regard the First World War (sparked in 1914) to be the end of an extended 19th century period. At least three possibilities propose themselves: The end of the Cold War / fall of the Berlin wall. 9/11/01, now a "War on Terror" some future point? I wonder whether 1991-2001 will be called the Interbellum, a period between the "cold war" attitudes of U.S. foreign relations. I think this is history, but move as appropriate. best, Peter Kirby  | 
| 
		
 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#2 | 
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: May 2005 
				Location: Sydney, Australia 
				
				
					Posts: 2,035
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			It really depends on what else happens in this century. Will the twenty first century be more like the period following the cold war or the war on terror? At this point, it is impossible to say IMO. Who could have predicted the two world wars at the turn of the century. Maybe the first was just waiting to happen, but even then it wasn't expected to last long.
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#3 | |
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Jan 2003 
				Location: Bli Bli 
				
				
					Posts: 3,135
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
 will be writing history (in a dominant sense) by then and will see it it terms of something they do rather than something that happens in the "west".  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#4 | |
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Jan 2005 
				Location: USA 
				
				
					Posts: 1,307
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#5 | |
| 
			
			 Contributor 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Mar 2003 
				Location: London UK 
				
				
					Posts: 16,024
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
 It was very dramatic and definitely caused a reaction, but historically it might be seen as quite small scale. Assassinations and bombings are not new. Might it be something else, like the Tsunami, a volcano or massive climate change, flooding and disease? What is this concept of end?  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#6 | |
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Jan 2005 
				Location: USA 
				
				
					Posts: 1,307
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#7 | 
| 
			
			 Contributor 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Mar 2003 
				Location: London UK 
				
				
					Posts: 16,024
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			There are loads of things much bigger than 911 - hiroshima and nagasaki as starters?  Rwanda?  The Tsunami. 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	I'm not sure there was much change in foreign policy - all the ideas were there before. There is a film out about this that you Americans are refusing to show....  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#8 | 
| 
			
			 Contributor 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Jun 2000 
				Location: Los Angeles area 
				
				
					Posts: 40,549
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			This isn't Biblical History. It seem to be more PD, but I don't think it really belongs in PD, which is a place to avoid IMHO. 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	Would you like to connect it somehow? We talk about first century Christianity and second century Christianity, but the real dividing points are the fall of the Temple in Jerusalem and/or the Bar Kochba Rebellion. Is century even a useful concept in history? World War II is much more of a dividing point in history than either 1900 or 2000 or any point in between, but it doesn't fit into a "century" marker.  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#9 | |
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Apr 2005 
				Location: Vancouver 
				
				
					Posts: 1,043
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#10 | |
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Oct 2004 
				Location: Anywhere but Colorado, including non-profits 
				
				
					Posts: 8,787
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread | 
		
  |