![]() |
Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
![]() |
#1 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 176
|
![]()
This may or may not have been adressed before...but here is my question to people who believe the universe is eternal and has always exsisted.
I read that many scientists believe that one day the stars will burn out and everything will die, etc etc.....However, if the universe is eternal and has ALWAYS existed, then why have the stars not burned up already?! Why are people still walking around? If the universe is eternal would all of this not have happened already?! Jonathan |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 1,877
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Contributor
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: (GSV) Lasting Damage
Posts: 10,734
|
![]()
well we still don't have a complete picture of the universe yet. The Ekpyrotic model for example spawns a sparkly new universe from an extremely old and flat one. I find this quite an exciting proposition.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: England
Posts: 3,934
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: The Deep South
Posts: 889
|
![]()
Oddly enough JTurtle the only poster I recall bringing up the question of an eternal universe is you. Why is that?
JT |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Obsessed Contributor
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Not Mayaned
Posts: 96,752
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: PA USA
Posts: 5,039
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: A Shadowy Planet
Posts: 7,585
|
![]() Quote:
Speculations of what the universe was like before that point are fully in the realm of the theoretical at the moment. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: springfield, MA. USA
Posts: 2,482
|
![]()
Some of us hazard the thought (This is not a synonym for "believe".) that the What-There-Is may be "eternal" in the sense that when "It" cycles-down to a certain "state' then "It" automatically "flips-over" and begins again.
I like this. It eliminates any need for a "Creator/(contradictory) self-started Starter"; it does away with problems about "start" and "ending"; and thus frees me to think about matters of greater pith & moment, and perhaps more accessible to examination and data-gathering.... |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|