FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-13-2013, 10:32 AM   #11
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 4,095
Default

Do you mind addressing the substance of the question, Chili if you are going to reply? I am asking why the AUTHOR of the gospel story confused known Hebrew names with others that are clearly distorted. For example, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that something went wrong somewhere to turn YEHUDA into JODA. One would have to assume that Joda would have been used for the biblical personage of Judah in Greek. Whereas Josech was Yehotzedek which got garbled, and yet the author couldn't double check, just like he got names such as Joseph, Nachum, Jacob and Amos correct.

We still have to examine the intentions of the gospel writers - or more importantly redactors - in using the name Mary (and Joseph) which evoke the Jewish stories concerning ben Pandera/ben Stada when they could have just as easily chosen names that did not do that, UNLESS the writers HAD an intention unknown to the Byzantine regime registering an insult to the person of Yesoos which required authors such as Origen to defend.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chili View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duvduv View Post
Does this explain why some Hebrew names listed in the GLuke genealogy are distorted and others are not??
You would have to ask Joseph that as he is the one who encountered his own lineage to the innermost depth of his being. I call it smoke, but if you think that there is some value in it that would be what theology is about. I just like poetry and theology is more like an enemy for me.

In essence, Joseph here celebrated his own awakening wherein he exposed his own thousand year reign, as did Hardy (but not Hopkins), and Golding and Shakespeare, and all those many Russian greats did the same, who so then came to be up to one thousand years old.

Most explicit here in detail is Zamjatin's "WE" for whom: "I, we four, are a powerful torment," and those were the same characters that Golding used in "The Spire."
Duvduv is offline  
Old 01-13-2013, 12:08 PM   #12
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Duvduv View Post
Do you mind addressing the substance of the question, Chili if you are going to reply? I am asking why the AUTHOR of the gospel story confused known Hebrew names with others that are clearly distorted. For example, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that something went wrong somewhere to turn YEHUDA into JODA. One would have to assume that Joda would have been used for the biblical personage of Judah in Greek. Whereas Josech was Yehotzedek which got garbled, and yet the author couldn't double check, just like he got names such as Joseph, Nachum, Jacob and Amos correct.

We still have to examine the intentions of the gospel writers - or more importantly redactors - in using the name Mary (and Joseph) which evoke the Jewish stories concerning ben Pandera/ben Stada when they could have just as easily chosen names that did not do that, UNLESS the writers HAD an I see and intention unknown to the Byzantine regime registering an insult to the person of Yesoos which required authors such as Origen to defend.
I see, and yes, you obviously have something there. But I am not a theologian to answer that. It is however my view that the four Gospels make an intricate quilt of one story wherein a new religion will be formed that is based on the same Genesis now as the answer or fulilment of the OT.

While this is true, it does not end Judah for them, as they need Judas Iscariot too, as the traitor, in their life when they get there. To this end we just use the anti-christ who became our enemy and friend as lost brethren when heaven was brought down to earth (my point that 'hell came crashing down' when that happened).

So it is not so that Judaism comes to an end, but remains as it always was, except for Catholics who do not owe allegiance to them as a religion all on its own, except for Gen. 1 to 3, wheren we come full circle when we reach the end of Revelations, and there than arrive and know the place as if for the first time.

In essense, our life is the same except your prophesy is reduced to intimation via the communion we have with the saints administered to us through the water baptism that we receive, that so becomes our 'life line' with the queen of heaven and earth to take us home from the complicated labyrinth that we weave on our own while outside of Eden.

Not sure if you are Jewish or not, but freely use 'you' as Jew for asking the question.

So I am not in a position to elaborate further than that.
Chili is offline  
Old 01-13-2013, 12:15 PM   #13
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by credoconsolans View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaybees View Post
After reading through this thread, I've become completely puzzled. How could Jesus' ancestry be traced through Joseph. Wasn't God Jesus' father? Shouldn't Jesus ancestry be traced through the real father rather than through Mary's husband?"

Puzzled!?
This.

Mary was impregnated by the Holy Spirit/God.

There is no genealogy for the child that goes back to the House of David if he is the son of a god.

And no impregnation occured as the perpetual Virgin she still is today with all kinds of saints in heaven.

Only those trying desperately to make a link to make Jesus the Messiah of the Hebrew Bible try to, ignoring the fact that any link they make then discredits the idea that Jesus was the son of a god.

My fundamentalist friends get around this little discrepancy by claiming Joseph adopted Jesus and by that act, Jesus can be part of Joseph's lineage.

Wonky, I know, but then most of the story is.
NO! Joseph was a devout Jew and is why Mary was from Nazareth to show just that.

The only difference is that his lineage does not end at the God of David or Abraham or whoever, but goes past all of those past Adam to God in evidence that he is the Son.
Chili is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:51 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.