FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-01-2012, 06:01 PM   #71
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Duvduv View Post
Tom, from the descriptions of these disputes over ostensibly obscure theological issues it sounds as if the emperors and others really had some kind of personal commitment to a particular idea, i.e. transubstantiation, homoosious, etc. beyond the political implications of it.
It just seems incredible that they didn't argue over something more tangible and with more practical consequences even if the dispute had political implications.
Homoosious is native to all sentient beings, which is just a fancy word for the relationship between the right and left brain that is based on the wisdom of the forefathers only. To add the son by way of inspiration is to feed him with icons to be enountered, and that doubles the complexity of the mythology, but also increases the risk of goatherders [like Moses] misleading the flock, and so the Inquisitor is part ofthe bargain.

Transubstantiation is just and icon but the sacred Amen is real in evidence of the comprehension proclaimed by the transformation itself.
Chili is offline  
Old 02-02-2012, 04:48 AM   #72
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 4,095
Default

Chili, your reply doesn't address my points about the dispute. Please read it again.
Duvduv is offline  
Old 02-02-2012, 07:47 AM   #73
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Duvduv View Post
Chili, your reply doesn't address my points about the dispute. Please read it again.
Ok then, should I say that 'charisma' was added = 'from the son' when Jesus breathed on them and they now were 'spirit filled' [as Jesuits-by-nature] and Jesus said: "go get them, give'r, [and zap them on the way out if you have to but be sure to show them your wounds first"] in John 20-22.

This effectively created the H.Trinity and set the 'fiery revolving sword' free from the gates of Eden. But notice again that Jesus gave this command after he showed them his wounds and said: "as I am, so I am sending you" so that your will not be a 'holly roller on the run' and get your own snake charming church going here instead.

This also explains why the the Eastern Rite did no accept the function if the Trinity which still today is the greatest fear in Judaism in Memory of their Past when Moses became a 'goat herder' by consent and led the 'Children if Isreal' into the Promised Land before God's time and died there nonetheless.
Chili is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:04 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.