Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
04-21-2012, 06:25 PM | #121 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
Quote:
Ehrman's statement is not precise, but he did seem to dispute the idea that the Romans kept records of births and deaths. I suspect he would like to rewrite that sentence. I have a Kindle for PC version, and a search on a few key terms does not show any other place where Ehrman discusses Roman record keeping. I suspect that is sufficiently outside his area of expertise that he does not in fact know the details of Roman vital statistics, birth records, etc. |
|
04-21-2012, 06:26 PM | #122 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 5,714
|
Surely he is referring to "detailed records" here. What claim is Ehrman responding to? If it is to a mythicist book claiming that "Romans kept detailed records of everything", then Ehrnan's comment makes sense.
|
04-21-2012, 06:31 PM | #123 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
Quote:
The reason this is not a good argument is not that Romans records weren't good enough, but that after 2000 years, most of the records have not survived. |
|
04-21-2012, 06:47 PM | #124 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 5,714
|
Quote:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but Carrier appears to be extrapolating this to a general comment about Romans throughout the Roman world. |
||
04-21-2012, 06:49 PM | #125 | ||
Contributor
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Barrayar
Posts: 11,866
|
Quote:
Vorkosigan |
||
04-21-2012, 07:04 PM | #126 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
|
04-21-2012, 07:19 PM | #127 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
|
Quote:
We have the statement of Carrier that Ehrman is INCOMPETENT and we have Ehrman's book. Let us NOT divert from the OP. |
|
04-21-2012, 07:23 PM | #128 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 5,714
|
Quote:
"... not only of Jesus but of nearly anyone living in the first century. We simply don't have birth notices, trial records, death certificates or other standard kinds of records that one has today.”Ehrman uses the present tense: "We simply don't have, etc" I find it hard to believe that Ehrman is claiming that the Romans never kept such records at all, or as Carrier puts it: "our not having them means Romans never kept them". Maybe Ehrman is claiming that all such records have gone, but Ehrman does say just before "NEARLY anyone living in the first century". So I'm wondering about the context there. |
||
04-21-2012, 07:23 PM | #129 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Iceland
Posts: 761
|
Well, for what it's worth, we all agree that Acharya is wrong!
|
04-21-2012, 07:31 PM | #130 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
|
Rabbi Simeon ben Azzai (late first/early second century) claims that he found a scroll of genealogical record in Jerusalem, in which was written: A certain person was illegitimately born of a married woman (m. Yebam. 4:13; cf. b. Yebam. 49a). This was understood to apply to Jesus. This in no way proves that Jesus existed, only that the Jews thought he was a mamzer - perhaps owing to gnostic speculation about the fall of Sophia?
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|