Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
05-03-2006, 12:09 PM | #211 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,396
|
|
05-03-2006, 12:09 PM | #212 | |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Palm Springs, California
Posts: 10,955
|
Quote:
|
|
05-03-2006, 12:12 PM | #213 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,396
|
Quote:
The fact that Isaiah considers MSHB to be a sign and the mundane nature of his conception, plus the strong parallel to the Immanuel unit completely cripples your interpretation, in my view. |
|
05-03-2006, 12:16 PM | #214 | |
Moderator -
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota
Posts: 4,639
|
Quote:
|
|
05-03-2006, 12:25 PM | #215 | |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Palm Springs, California
Posts: 10,955
|
Quote:
Isaiah 7:11 - "Ask a sign of the LORD your God; let it be deep as Sheol or high as heaven." Isaiah 7:14 - Therefore the Lord himself will give you a sign. Behold, a young woman shall conceive and bear a son, and shall call his name Imman'u-el. Isaiah 19:20 - It [an altar and pillar in the desert] will be a sign and a witness to the LORD of hosts in the land of Egypt; when they cry to the LORD because of oppressors he will send them a savior, and will defend and deliver them. Isaiah 20:3 - the LORD said, "As my servant Isaiah has walked naked and barefoot for three years as a sign and a portent against Egypt and Ethiopia, Isaiah 66:19 - and I will set a sign among them. And from them I will send survivors to the nations, to Tarshish, Put, and Lud, who draw the bow, to Tubal and Javan, to the coastlands afar off, that have not heard my fame or seen my glory; and they shall declare my glory among the nations. [by the way, I'm aware that Isaiah also uses oth to mean "banner" or "standard" but those are used literally and aren't appropriate to Isaiah 7. |
|
05-03-2006, 12:30 PM | #216 | |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Palm Springs, California
Posts: 10,955
|
Quote:
|
|
05-03-2006, 12:33 PM | #217 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,396
|
Quote:
Please explain: what miraculous sign is associated with MSHB? And what is miraculous about a naked barefoot man? It is unusual, as is a child named "God is with us" (suggest you check for appearances of immanuel in the Hebrew Bible), but not quite miraculous. Another problem with your analysis is that "sign" is paired with other words like "witness" (eid) or "wonder" (mofeit), and it might be that the second term in these pairings is what connotes something miraculous, while ot just signifies the "marker" aspect. I'm also unclear as to the nature of the sign in 66:19. What is it? The dispersal of refugees? Is that miraculous? I'm puzzled why you don't respond directly to my simple yet rigorous analysis of Isa 7-8. To recapitulate, Isa 8:18 identifies that the prophet and his sons serve "for signs and for wonders in Israel." One of his sons, MSHB, is introduced in the very same chapter. His conception is completely ordinary -- explicitly so -- but his name, like that of Immanuel, is unique. (Isa 7:14 is the only instance of the name Immanuel in the Hebrew bible. It goes without saying that 8:3 is the only instance of the name MSHB in the Hebrew Bible as well.) What, then, is the miraculous "sign" associated with MSHB? The strong parallels between the MSHB unit in Isa 8:3-4 and the Immanuel unit in Isa 7:10-16 rule out any miraculous birth for Immanuel. Could you respond to these points, please? By the way, I still agree with spin that the most compelling reading of Isa 7:10-16 has the woman already pregnant, which of course rules out any future miraculous conception. |
|
05-03-2006, 12:36 PM | #218 | ||
Moderator -
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota
Posts: 4,639
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
05-03-2006, 02:18 PM | #219 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Northeastern OH but you can't get here from there
Posts: 415
|
Quote:
Quote:
And if he wasn't a special case, why the need for a special birth? You are reading later ideas into earlier texts which is why the Gnostics disagreed with those proponents of what is now orthodoxy, and why they had to be eliminated. |
||
05-03-2006, 02:31 PM | #220 | ||||||
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Rabbinical usage of a term must be considered along with all the other indications, such as the cognates and the other biblical uses. These are quite illuminating, but you are too tunnelled into your outcome to do the work necessary to analyse the language. Quote:
Quote:
spin |
||||||
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|