Freethought & Rationalism Archive

mga · 10-07-2005, 07:19 AM

hopefully, rove will be behind bars in the near future along with several other key republicans.

one has to love the moral and ethical practices of the republican party. add to this the delay indictment, which has become even more serious lately, and it looks like the whole party may be headed for a grand shake up.

October 06, 2005
Who Will Be Indicted?

Lawrence O'Donnell, who seems to have pretty good sources on the CIA leak story, predicts the following: "At least three high level Bush Administration personnel indicted and possibly one or more very high level unindicted co-conspirators."

In a subsequent post, O'Donnell says Karl Rove's agreement to testify again before the grand jury is a solid indication his lawyer thinks he'll be indicted.

The Washington Post reports a "source close to Rove said Bush's chief political adviser and his legal team are now genuinely concerned he could face charges."

The New York Times adds to the speculation: "In recent days, Mr. Rove has been less visible than usual at the White House, fueling speculation that he is distancing himself from Mr. Bush or has been sidelined."

source and more:

http://politicalwire.com/archives/20..._indicted.html

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...100601092.html

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/07/po...rtner=homepage

Slumtrimpet · 10-07-2005, 07:31 AM

Well, we can hope.

butpresidentialpardonpresidentialpardonpresidentia lpardon :Cheeky:

Jet Black · 10-07-2005, 07:31 AM

\o/

no cigars in the white house eh?

Yeshi · 10-07-2005, 08:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mga

one has to love the moral and ethical practices of the republican party. add to this the delay indictment, which has become even more serious lately, and it looks like the whole party may be headed for a grand shake up.

why, dont they represent the "moral majority" ?

..and every country gets the government it deserves, etc..

Artemus · 10-07-2005, 06:47 PM

Latest news is that Rove, when directly asked back in falll '03, told Bush that he had no role in the leak. It was clear months ago after Cooper testified that that was a lie. So why is Rove still on the White House staff? (Rhetorical question.

)

Happy Wonderer · 10-07-2005, 07:34 PM

The practical question is "why has it now been leaked that Rove lied to Bush?" I think that it means that Rove has been tossed overboard. It couldn't happen to a nicer fellah...

Let's hope that Rove turns state's evidence.

hw

spin · 10-07-2005, 08:18 PM

It looks to me like Rove is complicit in the cover up to distance the shrub from any solid accusations.

mga · 10-08-2005, 06:06 AM

how does connecticut feel?

TiffyToo · 10-08-2005, 06:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mga

how does connecticut feel?

:rolling:

Thanks mga.

proudliberal · 10-08-2005, 12:39 PM

Quote:

hopefully, rove will be behind bars in the near future along with several other key republicans

Sorry the truth is rove, delay and many others will be pardoned by george w bush.I dont like it either, neither will bubba,but its the truth.

10-07-2005, 07:19 AM	#1
mga Banned Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: rochester- ny Karl Rove fan club Posts: 13,165	going down? hopefully, rove will be behind bars in the near future along with several other key republicans. one has to love the moral and ethical practices of the republican party. add to this the delay indictment, which has become even more serious lately, and it looks like the whole party may be headed for a grand shake up. October 06, 2005 Who Will Be Indicted? Lawrence O'Donnell, who seems to have pretty good sources on the CIA leak story, predicts the following: "At least three high level Bush Administration personnel indicted and possibly one or more very high level unindicted co-conspirators." In a subsequent post, O'Donnell says Karl Rove's agreement to testify again before the grand jury is a solid indication his lawyer thinks he'll be indicted. The Washington Post reports a "source close to Rove said Bush's chief political adviser and his legal team are now genuinely concerned he could face charges." The New York Times adds to the speculation: "In recent days, Mr. Rove has been less visible than usual at the White House, fueling speculation that he is distancing himself from Mr. Bush or has been sidelined." source and more: http://politicalwire.com/archives/20..._indicted.html http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...100601092.html http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/07/po...rtner=homepage

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

10-07-2005, 07:31 AM	#2
Slumtrimpet Senior Member Join Date: May 2002 Posts: 974	Well, we can hope. butpresidentialpardonpresidentialpardonpresidentia lpardon :Cheeky:

10-07-2005, 07:31 AM	#3
Jet Black Contributor Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: (GSV) Lasting Damage Posts: 10,734	\o/ no cigars in the white house eh?

10-07-2005, 06:47 PM	#5
Artemus Veteran Member Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: USA Posts: 2,467	Latest news is that Rove, when directly asked back in falll '03, told Bush that he had no role in the leak. It was clear months ago after Cooper testified that that was a lie. So why is Rove still on the White House staff? (Rhetorical question. )

10-07-2005, 07:34 PM	#6
Happy Wonderer Veteran Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Washington, the least religious state Posts: 5,334	The practical question is "why has it now been leaked that Rove lied to Bush?" I think that it means that Rove has been tossed overboard. It couldn't happen to a nicer fellah... Let's hope that Rove turns state's evidence. hw

10-07-2005, 08:18 PM	#7
spin Contributor Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: nowhere Posts: 15,747	It looks to me like Rove is complicit in the cover up to distance the shrub from any solid accusations.

10-08-2005, 06:06 AM	#8
mga Banned Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: rochester- ny Karl Rove fan club Posts: 13,165	how does connecticut feel?

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.