Steven Carr

' The evidence, Strobel demonstrates, points us to God, not away. Indeed, taken together, there is a cumulative case for faith in God, as the various sciences are examined in depth.'

'But it is simply inappropriate for scientists to wade into debates about God's existence or non-existence by means of the scientific method. It is inadequate for such a debate.'

Amazingly,one person wrote both sentences.

http://www.amazon.com/gp/cdp/member-...Fencoding=UTF8

KingLouie

He sure did.

From the Jungles of An Apparent Contradiction,

Kang Louie

Photon

Except, would you expect anything less from an apologist who claims to present an impartial "journalistic" view of the questions relating to god, and then willingly accepts answers from theologians without rebuttal, sometimes even mutually contradictory responses?

His adherence to doublethink is astounding in some passages of his books. The comments above, though, show a consistent double-standard that he employs when evaluating "evidence".