FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-10-2009, 11:35 AM   #331
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Dancing
Posts: 9,940
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chaucer View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by show_no_mercy View Post

I asked you before about this supposed "local" term. Local to where? "Christ" is found numerous times in the LXX refering to divinely appointed high priests and kings. Any Greek speaking Jew would know what the term "Christ" was, and Greek was the lingua franca of the entire Roman empire.

So unless you're trying to argue that "local" means "the entire Roman empire" you seem to be using that to ad hoc your way out of an illogical argument.

In Antiquities 20.10.1 Josephus mentions the Persian King Cyrus, who is called "god's anointed one" in Isaiah 45. A very specific phrase. Even though Cyrus fits the role of messiah perfectly, Josephus still doesn't use that term ("anointed one" - "christ") to describe Cyrus. But he's aware that Gentiles can be "messiahs" as well, which is why he argues that Vespasian was the messiah.

Quite ironically, every single high priest is a "christ" or "anointed one" but still Josephus never uses that phrase - either "anointed one" or "christ" - in Ant. 20.10 when enumerating the high priests. He does use the verb "anoint" (χρίω) in Antiquities Books 3, 6, 7, 9, 11, 19; War of the Jews Book 2 and 5. But Josephus never uses the phrase "anointed one" or "the Lord's anointed" or "god's anointed [one]". But he does use the phrase "anointed one" (christ in Greek) the two times he mentions the Jesus of Christianity.

Why is that?
Because Jesus the humdrum carpenter is the only one for whom this adjective/verb ever got changed to a noun in the first place.
Isaiah 45 LXX
45:1 ουτως λεγει κυριος ο θεος τω χριστω μου κυρω / This the Lord God says to my christ Cyrus

1 Samuel 2 LXX
2:10 [...] και υψωσει κερας χριστου αυτου / [...] and exalt the horn of his christ

1 Samuel 2 LXX
2:35 [...] και διελευσεται ενωπιον χριστου μου πασας τας ημερας / [...] and he will minister before my christ always

1 Samuel 12 LXX
12:3 ιδου εγω αποκριθητε κατ' εμου ενωπιον κυριου και ενωπιον χριστου αυτου / Here I stand. Testify against me in the presence of YHWH and his christ.

2 Samuel 19 LXX
19:22 και απεκριθη αβεσσα υιος σαρουιας και ειπεν μη αντι τουτου ου θανατωθησεται σεμει οτι κατηρασατο τον χριστον κυριου / Then Abishai son of Zeruiah said, "Shouldn't Shimei be put to death for this? He cursed the LORD's christ

1 Chronicles 16 LXX
16:22 μη αψησθε των χριστων μου και εν τοις προφηταις μου μη πονηρευεσθε / Do not touch my christ; do my prophets no harm

2 Chronicles 6 LXX
6:42 κυριε ο θεος μη αποστρεψης το προσωπον του χριστου σου μνησθητι τα ελεη δαυιδ του δουλου σου / O LORD God, do not reject your christ. Remember the great love promised to David your servant

Psalm 2 LXX
2:2 παρεστησαν οι βασιλεις της γης και οι αρχοντες συνηχθησαν επι το αυτο κατα του κυριου και κατα του χριστου αυτου διαψαλμα / The kings of the earth take their stand and the rulers gather together against the LORD and against his Christ

Psalm 17 LXX
17:51 μεγαλυνων τας σωτηριας του βασιλεως αυτου και ποιων ελεος τω χριστω αυτου τω δαυιδ και τω σπερματι αυτου εως αιωνος / He gives his king great victories; he shows unfailing kindness to his christ, to David and his descendants forever

Psalm 27 LXX
27:8 κυριος κραταιωμα του λαου αυτου και υπερασπιστης των σωτηριων του χριστου αυτου εστιν / The LORD is the strength of his people, a fortress of salvation for his christ

Lamentations 4 LXX
4:20 πνευμα προσωπου ημων χριστος κυριου συνελημφθη εν ταις διαφθοραις αυτων ου ειπαμεν εν τη σκια αυτου ζησομεθα εν τοις εθνεσιν / The LORD's christ, our very life breath, was caught in their traps. We thought that under his shadow we would live among the nations

These (and many more like it) instances of "christ" are all nouns in the LXX. They're titles. Josephus considers the LXX to have been divinely inspired. The point being, which is totally lost on you for some reason, is that Josephus never uses the phrase anointed one, or the lord's anointed one. Ever. The only time he uses that phrase is when he uses it on the Jesus of Christianity.

Of course, reading Josephus with your Christian glasses on you simply read it as "christ", but it would really be translated as "anointed one". Why does Josephus never use the phrase anointed one? That's the question you need to be answering, not your apologetics about "anointed one" only being used on Jesus during Josephus' lifetime (in which the LXX was still considered divinely inspired and used by Greek speaking Jews).
show_no_mercy is offline  
Old 08-10-2009, 12:18 PM   #332
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: New York, U.S.A.
Posts: 715
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by show_no_mercy View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chaucer View Post

Because Jesus the humdrum carpenter is the only one for whom this adjective/verb ever got changed to a noun in the first place.
Isaiah 45 LXX
45:1 ουτως λεγει κυριος ο θεος τω χριστω μου κυρω / This the Lord God says to my christ Cyrus

1 Samuel 2 LXX
2:10 [...] και υψωσει κερας χριστου αυτου / [...] and exalt the horn of his christ

1 Samuel 2 LXX
2:35 [...] και διελευσεται ενωπιον χριστου μου πασας τας ημερας / [...] and he will minister before my christ always

1 Samuel 12 LXX
12:3 ιδου εγω αποκριθητε κατ' εμου ενωπιον κυριου και ενωπιον χριστου αυτου / Here I stand. Testify against me in the presence of YHWH and his christ.

2 Samuel 19 LXX
19:22 και απεκριθη αβεσσα υιος σαρουιας και ειπεν μη αντι τουτου ου θανατωθησεται σεμει οτι κατηρασατο τον χριστον κυριου / Then Abishai son of Zeruiah said, "Shouldn't Shimei be put to death for this? He cursed the LORD's christ

1 Chronicles 16 LXX
16:22 μη αψησθε των χριστων μου και εν τοις προφηταις μου μη πονηρευεσθε / Do not touch my christ; do my prophets no harm

2 Chronicles 6 LXX
6:42 κυριε ο θεος μη αποστρεψης το προσωπον του χριστου σου μνησθητι τα ελεη δαυιδ του δουλου σου / O LORD God, do not reject your christ. Remember the great love promised to David your servant

Psalm 2 LXX
2:2 παρεστησαν οι βασιλεις της γης και οι αρχοντες συνηχθησαν επι το αυτο κατα του κυριου και κατα του χριστου αυτου διαψαλμα / The kings of the earth take their stand and the rulers gather together against the LORD and against his Christ

Psalm 17 LXX
17:51 μεγαλυνων τας σωτηριας του βασιλεως αυτου και ποιων ελεος τω χριστω αυτου τω δαυιδ και τω σπερματι αυτου εως αιωνος / He gives his king great victories; he shows unfailing kindness to his christ, to David and his descendants forever

Psalm 27 LXX
27:8 κυριος κραταιωμα του λαου αυτου και υπερασπιστης των σωτηριων του χριστου αυτου εστιν / The LORD is the strength of his people, a fortress of salvation for his christ

Lamentations 4 LXX
4:20 πνευμα προσωπου ημων χριστος κυριου συνελημφθη εν ταις διαφθοραις αυτων ου ειπαμεν εν τη σκια αυτου ζησομεθα εν τοις εθνεσιν / The LORD's christ, our very life breath, was caught in their traps. We thought that under his shadow we would live among the nations

These (and many more like it) instances of "christ" are all nouns in the LXX. They're titles. Josephus considers the LXX to have been divinely inspired. The point being, which is totally lost on you for some reason, is that Josephus never uses the phrase anointed one, or the lord's anointed one. Ever. The only time he uses that phrase is when he uses it on the Jesus of Christianity.

Of course, reading Josephus with your Christian glasses on you simply read it as "christ", but it would really be translated as "anointed one". Why does Josephus never use the phrase anointed one? That's the question you need to be answering, not your apologetics about "anointed one" only being used on Jesus during Josephus' lifetime (in which the LXX was still considered divinely inspired and used by Greek speaking Jews).
You need to answer this question. How, if ever, does Josephus make reference to Cyrus or to anyone else who is termed "Christ" in the LXX, and in what terms?

Chaucer
Chaucer is offline  
Old 08-10-2009, 12:25 PM   #333
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Dancing
Posts: 9,940
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chaucer View Post
You need to answer this question. How, if ever, does Josephus make reference to Cyrus or to anyone else who is termed "Christ" in the LXX, and in what terms?
This is my entire point, and is actually the question I'm asking you. He never refers to any of these people in the LXX as "the anointed one" or "the lord's anointed" in his rendition of the history of Judaism. Absolutely no one in Josephus' "Antiquities" is given that title - even though, with the Cyrus example, he more than adequately fits the description. But he does use the verb "anoint" multiple times. Never the noun ("anointed one" or "the lord's anointed"). Why does Josephus avoid that title (the anointed one), but yet the only two times he uses that phrase is on the Jesus of Christianity (which is rendered as "christ")?
show_no_mercy is offline  
Old 08-10-2009, 12:31 PM   #334
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: New York, U.S.A.
Posts: 715
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by show_no_mercy View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chaucer View Post
You need to answer this question. How, if ever, does Josephus make reference to Cyrus or to anyone else who is termed "Christ" in the LXX, and in what terms?
This is my entire point, and is actually the question I'm asking you. He never refers to any of these people in the LXX as "the anointed one" or "the lord's anointed" in his rendition of the history of Judaism.
So how does he refer to them? Can you show me a parallel reference side-by-side to one and the same figure -- Cyrus or whoever -- where we can compare and contrast an LXX characterization with a Josephus one?

Chaucer
Chaucer is offline  
Old 08-10-2009, 01:34 PM   #335
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Dancing
Posts: 9,940
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chaucer View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by show_no_mercy View Post

This is my entire point, and is actually the question I'm asking you. He never refers to any of these people in the LXX as "the anointed one" or "the lord's anointed" in his rendition of the history of Judaism.
So how does he refer to them? Can you show me a parallel reference side-by-side to one and the same figure -- Cyrus or whoever -- where we can compare and contrast an LXX characterization with a Josephus one?

Chaucer
This is Josephus on Cyrus in Antiquities Book 11
http://www.earlyjewishwritings.com/t...hus/ant11.html

This is the Hebrew Bible on Cyrus (2 Chron 36, Ezra 1-6, Isaiah 44-45). All of the messainic language is In Isaiah (since he's the only one who's a prophet out of the three):

Quote:
Originally Posted by Isaiah 44:28
who says of Cyrus, 'He is my shepherd and will accomplish all that I please; he will say of Jerusalem, "Let it be rebuilt," and of the temple, "Let its foundations be laid." '
Quote:
Originally Posted by Isaiah 45:13
I will raise up Cyrus in my righteousness: I will make all his ways straight. He will rebuild my city and set my exiles free, but not for a price or reward, says the LORD Almighty."
Isaiah 45:1 refers to Cyrus as YHWH's anointed one. To take this literally is a non-sequitur because Cyrus wasn't consecrated as a Jewish king, and thus wouldn't have had the Jewish ceremony of being anointed with olive oil. It's simply a title meaning divine authority and kingship.
show_no_mercy is offline  
Old 08-10-2009, 06:14 PM   #336
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alaska
Posts: 9,159
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chaucer View Post
How then does one account for the fact that this removal process is already done without any "modernizing" ad hoc process whatever, when it comes to the highly fanciful physical miracles being totally absent from all non-Scriptural texts, be it the sayings in Thomas or the references in Josephus, Pliny, Tacitus, Suetonius, and on and on?
Quite a mouthful of nonsequitor. How do I account for miracles being absent from all nonscriptural texts?

This is a rhetorical question. With this implied logic: There are nonscriptural references to Jesus without miracles. Therefore Jesus was real.


That logic does not follow, even if I grant your faulty premise. Which I don't.

Thomas?! Are you kidding? OMG Okay. A new low! The Gospel of Thomas weighed in as evidence for the historical Jesus. I see Toto has already teed off on that one.

Pliny - he investigated and mentioned no founder of Christianity who was crucified. Fits well with early Christianity being allegorical Christ, not "big bang" theory of historical Jesus.

I see others have dealt with them all...


I think I understand now there is a huge difference between "Historical Christianity" and "Historical Jesus".

You have to ignore or misuse the History of Christianity in order to dream up a historical Jesus. It was an allegorical Jesus first. Revealed through vision.
rlogan is offline  
Old 08-11-2009, 12:44 AM   #337
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 3,397
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rlogan View Post
You have to ignore or misuse the History of Christianity in order to dream up a historical Jesus. It was an allegorical Jesus first. Revealed through vision.
...somewhere in modern day Turkey...
dog-on is offline  
Old 08-11-2009, 05:35 AM   #338
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: New York, U.S.A.
Posts: 715
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by show_no_mercy View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chaucer View Post

So how does he refer to them? Can you show me a parallel reference side-by-side to one and the same figure -- Cyrus or whoever -- where we can compare and contrast an LXX characterization with a Josephus one?

Chaucer
This is Josephus on Cyrus in Antiquities Book 11
http://www.earlyjewishwritings.com/t...hus/ant11.html

This is the Hebrew Bible on Cyrus (2 Chron 36, Ezra 1-6, Isaiah 44-45). All of the messainic language is In Isaiah (since he's the only one who's a prophet out of the three):



Quote:
Originally Posted by Isaiah 45:13
I will raise up Cyrus in my righteousness: I will make all his ways straight. He will rebuild my city and set my exiles free, but not for a price or reward, says the LORD Almighty."
Isaiah 45:1 refers to Cyrus as YHWH's anointed one. To take this literally is a non-sequitur because Cyrus wasn't consecrated as a Jewish king, and thus wouldn't have had the Jewish ceremony of being anointed with olive oil. It's simply a title meaning divine authority and kingship.
Now Isaiah 45:1 versus Antiquities 11 will give me something tangible to look at. Thank you.

Best,

Chaucer
Chaucer is offline  
Old 08-18-2009, 12:09 AM   #339
fta
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Oceania
Posts: 334
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chaucer View Post
...Reading the downright lying assertions by various mythicists -- [paraphrases] "all Jesus's sayings uniformly have precedents in prior philosophies and creeds"...
What are some sayings of Jesus that have NO precedent in prior philosophies and creeds?
fta is offline  
Old 08-18-2009, 07:58 AM   #340
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 5,679
Default

If any man come to me, and hate not his father, and mother, and wife, and children, and brethren, and sisters, yea and his own life also, he cannot be my disciple.--Lk 14:26
No Robots is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:47 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.