FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-09-2009, 07:54 AM   #191
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 400
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doug Shaver View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by jgoodguy View Post
Any kind?

Like Southern attitudes toward blacks in the 1930s and 1860s. Civil War Battles, antebellum life, antebellum social structure, the occupation of the South, the rise of the KK the existence of slavery et. al.
It is a source for those things, but only because we have other sources by which we can corroborate them.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jgoodguy View Post
If it was our only source and known to be fiction, historical information could be found.
Yes, it could, but the only reason we know that is that it is not our only source.

Yep, but my assumption is that it was an only source. I should have said only written source. The ruins of Atlanta would be known and some monuments to the civil war would have survived. The Lincoln Monument may have survived. Even some civil war graves and battle sites would have been excavated. There are even fragments of the Twelve Oaks House(seen in the opening scenes of the move GWTW) in Atlanta that might survive to that far in the future day.

In any case, I wanted to make 2 points: 1. Just because it is fiction, that does not mean it does not have historical information(GWTW was intended as a historical accurate novel); 2. Not all information found in a novel is historical and historical analysis can be led astray.

Even artifacts can led to wrong conclusions. The fragments of Twelve Oaks in Atlanta are fiction though they are both not written and are tangible.

The Gospels contained historical information to make them more credible. I think the historical information extends to a Historical Jesus, but it may not. I'd not bet the house on it.
jgoodguy is offline  
Old 12-10-2009, 07:45 AM   #192
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Bernardino, Calif.
Posts: 5,435
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jgoodguy View Post
The Gospels contained historical information to make them more credible. I think the historical information extends to a Historical Jesus, but it may not. I'd not bet the house on it.
That works.

And I appreciate the way you clarified your point. I have no quarrel with that analysis.
Doug Shaver is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:25 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.