![]() |
Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
![]() |
#11 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Southern California
Posts: 287
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: blind among the flowers
Posts: 1,647
|
![]()
First one — weather balloon.
The second one is from a Sci-Fi Channel promo; definitely fake. It must have been a slow news day. |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Moderator - Science Discussions
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Providence, RI, USA
Posts: 9,908
|
![]()
swamp gas.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Searching for reality on the long and winding road
Posts: 12,976
|
![]() Quote:
Could you explain to me something I have always wondered about? Why is it that some people will accept an explanation of an intersteller craft piloted by extra-terrestrial beings as being more believable than an explanation that there is not enough detail to tell exactly what it is but that if there were more detail it would most likely be recognized as something quite common? |
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|