FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-05-2012, 01:02 PM   #41
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Italy
Posts: 708
Default

Quote:
The Sheriff Of Notingham wrote:

A man of culture? You don't have oi get insulting. I am ordinary. Beer, peanuts, and football games.

.............

The gospel stories make sense as a composite of the overall events much as docu-drama today based on composite characters with literary license as to the screenlay dialogue and story.

It is my conjecture. There is no proof to be found in any of the scriptures. I object to a conclusion of absolute certainty.
.
"..A man of culture? You don't have oi get insulting. I am ordinary.."

But, I don't understand... From your profile: Occupation: engineer...

Quote:
I entertain the possibillity of an HJ because we know there were people who claimed the mantle of messiah and we know the political conditions in Judea and the unrest. The overall story of a wandering rabai at odds with the temple beaurachracy and Jewish elite makes sense. You only have to look at the Christians vs got conflict today. Many outspoken and hostile Christian ministers raging with claims of immorality and hypocrisy. Recently a concervative mnister suggest all gays be rounded up ina fenced area.
.
Frankly I don't understand...What, all this, has to do with research on the historical Jesus?....

Quote:
The gospel stories make sense as a composite of the overall events much as docu-drama today based on composite characters with literary license as to the screenlay dialogue and story.
.
All this goes up ONLY for the Jesus of faith, which is virtually nonexistent on the historical level, so much it is different from the REAL one: ie the Jesus of History! ..

"..It is my conjecture. There is no proof to be found in any of the scriptures. I object to a conclusion of absolute certainty..."

You can formulate an infinite number of hypothesis.... However, only a serious research can lead us to historical truth.

You base your negative judgments only for 'hearsay', and with this 'method' no sensible person can formulate judgments ... It is necessary to work and study much harshly, to say something with knowledge of the facts! ... They are over 16 years that I sacrifice myself for this ...


Littlejohn

.
Littlejohn is offline  
Old 06-05-2012, 01:20 PM   #42
Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Seattle
Posts: 27,602
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Littlejohn View Post
Quote:
The Sheriff Of Notingham wrote:

A man of culture? You don't have oi get insulting. I am ordinary. Beer, peanuts, and football games.

.............

The gospel stories make sense as a composite of the overall events much as docu-drama today based on composite characters with literary license as to the screenlay dialogue and story.

It is my conjecture. There is no proof to be found in any of the scriptures. I object to a conclusion of absolute certainty.
.
"..A man of culture? You don't have oi get insulting. I am ordinary.."

But, I don't understand... From your profile: Occupation: engineer...



Frankly I don't understand...What, all this, has to do with research on the historical Jesus?....

Quote:
The gospel stories make sense as a composite of the overall events much as docu-drama today based on composite characters with literary license as to the screenlay dialogue and story.
.
All this goes up ONLY for the Jesus of faith, which is virtually nonexistent on the historical level, so much it is different from the REAL one: ie the Jesus of History! ..

"..It is my conjecture. There is no proof to be found in any of the scriptures. I object to a conclusion of absolute certainty..."

You can formulate an infinite number of hypothesis.... However, only a serious research can lead us to historical truth.

You base your negative judgments only for 'hearsay', and with this 'method' no sensible person can formulate judgments ... It is necessary to work and study much harshly, to say something with knowledge of the facts! ... They are over 16 years that I sacrifice myself for this ...


Littlejohn

.
The cultured side as I sense you mean of me ends with Pirates Of Pendance. I grew up in American culture. Burgers, french fries, and Rock and Roll. Later Gerswin, Copland, Jazz. American 'opera' like An American In Paris. Art in general to me is frou frou as is the idea of cultured.

Aanyone can make conjectures based on line of reasoning, but such is not proof. Unless perhaps you channel Edgar Cayce.
steve_bnk is offline  
Old 06-05-2012, 04:31 PM   #43
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: On the path of knowledge
Posts: 8,889
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Littlejohn View Post
Quote:
Sheshbazzar wrote:

Little Johnny,

You know I have been reading your posts from the first day that you appeared on these Forums. It is clearly evident that you draw the material for your theories from a broad range of religious and quasi-religious writings, without employing much distinction at all as to their origins or value, in other than whatever material you may choose to crib from them to shore up those presuppositions that you are attempting to support and add to.
.
"..without employing much distinction at all as to their origins or value..."

I'm glad about your personal 'relief' (note), since this allows me to clarify an aspect very important - at least for me:

" If I got where I arrived, namely to understand virtually ALL of what there is to understand about the true origins of Christianity (believe it or not, it is thus!), it is mainly because I kept OPEN ALL DOORS (*), without distinction of antiquity (presumed o true), neither of the origins, neither of the 'race' of the documents I analyzed! "

All this makes it ABSOLUTELY necessary, because Jesus was NOT just a character of uncommon intelligence, but was also extremely eclectic and 'POLIEDRICO' (versatile)! ... Able to show himself under multiple identities and undertake various roles, such as (at the close of his life, lasting 66 years and NOT 33!) the role of rebel leader of a small army of about 850-900 armed GALILEANS (see Julian the 'Apostate', which called' Galileans' the Jesus' followers). It was just this his extraordinary attitude that makes, even now, extremely elusive his historical figure to the 'specola' of the researchers around the world!

Quote:
The few references you do allude to often as not trace back to the highly inventive and fictional Catholic sources of the 5th, 8th or 12th centuries, or as in this latest display of a lack of discrimination on the quality of your sources, to the Frenchman Hippolyte Léon Denizard Rivail, aka 'Allen Kardek', whom during the early 19th century was a well known charlatan 'Medium' whom engaged in the then popular craze of delivering 'messages' from 'the spirits of the dearly departed'.
.
"..to the Frenchman Hippolyte Léon Denizard Rivail, aka 'Allen Kardek'.."

The "charlatan" Allen Kardek, as you define him (and that, however, was a graduate and an esteemed scholar)
Unfortunately, one who went to his grave with the shit of his dishonesty all over his hands.
Quote:
was NOT for me a source of NO ONE DATA! ... Simply I felt comforted by certain of his statements ... That's it!
Oh yeah... the "really extraordinary!" real prophecy' that set your shorts on fire, but which you have now apparently became too ashamed of to even present it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Littlejohn
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheshbazzar
It is a sad thing to see a person who does not comprehend the requirements of real textual scholarship, neglect his family responsibilities and so fritter away his life chasing after wraiths.
.
At least wait you until the publication of my book, before you judge .....

(*) - including also those of 'spiritualism' or 'seers'. It has been, in fact, thanks to Edgar Cayce if I have been able to guess a very important data, then comforted by research that I carried on. This aspect is still unknown to the world of 'official' scholarship, although it has been always under the eyes of all!
icardfacepalm: Well there it is folks
Try to do a guy a favor....

Oh well, If you wish to totally undermine and destroy any crediblity for all of your lifes work by association with that kind of fraudulent gimcracery no one here can stop you.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Littlejohn
At least wait you until the publication of my book, before you judge .....
All of your previous post here are still on file, and quite easily accessable, including where you told us how you had been neglecting your family.
Even in this thread 14 hours a day? at your computer?
That is sick Littlejohn. And is extremely bad for your cardiac (heart) health.
It won't help you get your book publised if you kill yourself before your time.
Perhaps you should be scheduling a few of those hours with a Shrink (Psychiatrist).

And what are you doing? Simply searching for more of this insane source material that will further support for your preconceptions.

Do you even know what the term "confirmation bias" means?
and how it distorts, and can render ones most deeply held conclusions invalid?

Real scholars, and others here DO KNOW exactly what confirmation bias means.
And you are displaying what is perhaps the most extreme case of 'confirmation bias' to appear on this Forum in years. ('Adam' here runs a close second.)

Now I am certain, that over the years, and with all of that study and effort you have expended, that there is in that accumulated bag of knowledge and material, things that are factual, things that are important, and information that would prove to be quite valuable information to all historical scholars.
But even if your book gets published we will likely still never know what you have, that was really important, because you will have it so deeply buried under huge loads of fraudulent horse-shit from the likes of Kardek, Cayce, and every other crackpot and fraud that ever existed, that it will never come to light.
We can point this problem out to you, but no one can stop you from doing this to yourself, except yourself.


I am not here to trash you, or your work, but placed as a helpful malakh to point the way.
For every purpose under heaven there is as season; A time to gather, and a time to cast away of that which has been gathered;

An unsolicited yet kindly word of advice from a fellow wayfarer.
The path ahead is steep, rocky, and trecherous. A man who is wise will set down his bundle, and go through it, reserving only the essentials and casting aside the excess.

You have came far, yet there is further to go. You have done well, but you can do better, for there is better yet to be done.

Were it but the voice of a braying ass in The Way, would you at all regard it?
m'Bein a'tha ha'devarim ha'alah?

Sheshbazzar The Hebrew
Sheshbazzar is offline  
Old 06-06-2012, 12:37 AM   #44
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Italy
Posts: 708
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by steve_bnk View Post
Unfortunatly for you I know who Edgar Cayce was and with that you reveal yourself. Your reference to secret Jesus techings and revelations now make sense.

Jesus the non divine mystic and seer?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edgar_Cayce

'....Edgar Cayce (/ˈkeɪsiː/; March 18, 1877 – January 3, 1945) was an American psychic who allegedly had the ability to give answers to questions on subjects such as healing or Atlantis while in a hypnotic trance. Though Cayce himself was a devout Christian and lived before the emergence of the New Age Movement, some believe he was the founder of the movement and influenced its teachings.[1]

Cayce became a celebrity toward the end of his life and the publicity given to his prophecies has overshadowed what to him were usually considered the more important parts of his work, such as healing (the vast majority of his readings were given for people who were sick) and theology (Cayce was a lifelong, devout member of the Disciples of Christ). Skeptics[2] challenge the statement that Cayce demonstrated psychic abilities, and traditional Christians also question his unorthodox answers on religious matters (such as reincarnation and Akashic records, although others accept his abilities as "God-given").

Cayce founded a nonprofit organization, the Association for Research and Enlightenment....'

I had a Lithuanian prof for a number of philiophy classes in the early 70s including religion. He had been studying for the RCC priesthood and opted out for philosophy. His specialialty was Christian mystic traditions. According to him there was a history of Cayce like sects which were suppresed.
.
In focus:

Quote:
Unfortunatly for you I know who Edgar Cayce was and with that you reveal yourself. Your reference to secret Jesus techings and revelations now make sense.

Jesus the non divine mystic and seer?
.
At this point I think you feign to no understand ... You talk as if my studies were based ONLY on what you put in prominence, ie the 'spiritualist' aspect ... Is it possible that you can not acknowledge that for me this ONLY was a MERE APPENDAGE? ....

A statement by Allan Kardec has comforted me in my research and encouraged me to continue with greater vigor, while the claims, or 'visions' (if you want so call them), of Edgar Cayce have me 'lead', so to speak, towards one aspect which has also been fully confirmed by my subsequent researches!

Quote:
I had a Lithuanian prof for a number of philiophy classes in the early 70s including religion. He had been studying for the RCC priesthood and opted out for philosophy. His specialialty was Christian mystic traditions. According to him there was a history of Cayce like sects which were suppresed.
.
If your Lithuanian professor was a truly intelligent person, can not have not guessed, thanks to Cayce, what I guessed even! ...


Littlejohn

____________________

".. Faith leads men to the feet of other men; the reason and the
search for truth them leads closer to God. I do not know what
He is, but I know what He is not... Search you the truth, and it
will make you free and you will understand what is not God..."

.
Littlejohn is offline  
Old 06-06-2012, 06:31 AM   #45
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Italy
Posts: 708
Default

Quote:
Sheshbazzar wrote:

Oh well, If you wish to totally undermine and destroy any crediblity for all of your lifes work by association with that kind of fraudulent gimcracery no one here can stop you.

Unfortunately, one who went to his grave with the shit of his dishonesty all over his hands.

Oh yeah... the "really extraordinary!" real prophecy' that set your shorts on fire, but which you have now apparently became too ashamed of to even present it.

icardfacepalm: Well there it is folks
Try to do a guy a favor....

Oh well, If you wish to totally undermine and destroy any crediblity for all of your lifes work by association with that kind of fraudulent gimcracery no one here can stop you.
.
"..If you wish to totally undermine and destroy any crediblity for all of your lifes work.."

If after all that I have written, you continue to press this 'key', it means that you or you are a mere provocateur, who is interested only to denigrate and deny, to the bitter end, all that I'm exposing, without the slightest knowledge of the facts, or you are really like a 'simple' guy, unable to acknowledge what any sensible person would be able to understand

Anyway, listen this:

I can discuss with you, and everyone else in this forum, about WHO Jesus WAS, NOT whether he was or not, namely whether he existed or not!..

These speeches do not make sense to me, because the proponents of the thesis 'no historical existence of Jesus', myticists or other, are forced to reject and/or arbitrarily to 'empty' of trust an infinity of data and concrete aspects, starting from inalienable and irrepressible rabbinic and mandaean testimonies, continuing then with the over 70 Gnostic sects, present in the empire of the second century a.d.

There has need a REALLY TWISTED mind, to think that could have been born so many Gnostic sects if Jesus had never existed!..

Again: to consider that the false 'Testimonium Flavianum' it was packaged ONLY to strengthen the historicity of Jesus, in a period when NO ONE questioned it (see Hierocles, Porphyry, Julian the Apostate, etc..) it is not only an absurd, but very silly thing! ... In fact, the Testimonium Flavianum was written ONLY to put in the mouth of the JEW historian Josephus, the claim that Jesus was MORE WHAT A MAN! ...(ie a trascendent being)

What REALLY came challenged, since the mid-third century (*), was the supposed 'divinity' of Jesus, NOT his historical existence!

Calling a JEW HISTORIAN, as Josephus, to tell that Jesus was MORE WHAT A MAN, to the forger clergy of the time must have seemed like a very convincing proof.

"..Perhaps you should be scheduling a few of those hours with a Shrink (Psychiatrist)..."

I had the good manners not to raise this issue, but since you, instead, you have raised it, then I can tell you with absolute certainty, that if there is anyone here in the forums FRDB that needs a good psychiatrist, the one ARE YOU! .. A 'normal' person can be so even obtuse, but when you reach levels as your own, then there is much to worry about ....

If you like to discuss only on the existence or not of Jesus, then you need to find another 'client' ... I have many things yet to be exhibited, and I think that besides you there are also people who are interested instead to follow what I going to expose.

____________________________

(*) - When the emperor Decius put in difficulty the apparatus Christian clergyman, who until then had enjoyed undoubted privileges (in spite of hallucinating lies of the counterfeiter fathers about the alleged 'Christian martyrs'), having been the cult 'catholic-Christian' an EMANATION of secular power of the second century ad.
.
Littlejohn is offline  
Old 06-06-2012, 07:22 AM   #46
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: On the path of knowledge
Posts: 8,889
Default

We meet, we have spoken, we move on.
I have nothing more to say to you.
Sheshbazzar is offline  
Old 06-06-2012, 07:36 AM   #47
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Italy
Posts: 708
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheshbazzar View Post

We meet, we have spoken, we move on.
I have nothing more to say to you.
.

Very well!..

.
Littlejohn is offline  
Old 06-14-2012, 02:24 PM   #48
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Italy
Posts: 708
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by George Orwell in "Why I Write"

Four motives for writing

Orwell lists "four great motives for writing" which he feels exist in every writer. He explains that all are present, but in different proportions, and also that these proportions vary from time to time. They are as follows:

1.Sheer egoism-

Orwell argues that many people write simply to feel clever, to "be talked about, to be remembered after death, to get your own back on grown-ups in childhood, etc." He says that this is a great motive, although most of humanity is not "acutely selfish", and that this motive exists mainly in younger writers. He also says that it exists more in serious writers than journalists, though serious writers are "less interested in money".

2.Aesthetic enthusiasm-

Orwell explains that present in writing is the desire to make one's writing look and sound good, having "pleasure in the impact of one sound on another, in the firmness of good prose or the rhythm of a good story." He says that this motive is "very feeble in a lot of writers" but still present in all works of writing.

3.Historical impulse-

He sums this up stating this motive is the "desire to see things as they are, to find out true facts and store them up for the use of posterity."

4.Political purpose-

Orwell writes that "no book is genuinely free from political bias", and further explains that this motive is used very commonly in all forms of writing in the broadest sense, citing a "desire to push the world in a certain direction" in every person. He concludes by saying that "the opinion that art should have nothing to do with politics is itself a political attitude."
.
I would add again: for the pleasure of helping people understand the truth and get rid of slavery induced by ultra-millenary plagiarism of a clergy among the most cynical and more bloody of all history: that catholic-christian!


Littlejohn

.
Littlejohn is offline  
Old 06-14-2012, 07:23 PM   #49
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Oregon
Posts: 738
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
I received your message, but I do not understand it completely. I am not sure why you did not post it for everyone.
You have been set aside for a personal revelation. How honored you must feel.
Grog is offline  
Old 06-14-2012, 07:25 PM   #50
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Oregon
Posts: 738
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Littlejohn View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheshbazzar View Post

We meet, we have spoken, we move on.
I have nothing more to say to you.
.

Very well!..

.
This has been fascinating. Thank you for your time and interesting perspective.
Grog is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:07 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.