FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-07-2004, 03:09 PM   #31
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Planet Lovetron
Posts: 3,919
Default

Methinks thou dost protest too much.
luvluv is offline  
Old 08-07-2004, 03:19 PM   #32
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

This thread has to be read in context. It was a take-off on How was Jesus so Wise?

I am not sure that anything here should be taken very seriously, or at least not as seriously as some of you seem to be.
Toto is offline  
Old 08-07-2004, 03:40 PM   #33
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Lincoln.ne.us
Posts: 37
Default

Let's say I own a Lamborghini. Further, I want to describe to you the intimate details of driving a Lambo. Do you want to hear? What purpose will it serve?

I imagine you saying "Ok, fine" and going about your normal business. More likely, you wouldn't even want to hear what I have to tell you.
Riddick is offline  
Old 08-07-2004, 03:50 PM   #34
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Riddick - suppose we were trying to run a discussion board on Biblical Criticism and History. We are interested in examining the texts for understanding history or religion.

What are we to do with someone who drags his Lamborghini into the discussion? I might salivate over the details of luxury cars, but this is not the place.

Jesus is protrayed in the gospels as giving public and private teaching on various subjects. Some refer to him as a "wisdom teacher." So the question arises, whether he was wise - wise in terms of the times, or wise in our terms. He is supposed to have draw crowds. Why do you suppose this was - did he talk about chariot maintenance? Did he say anything that other wisdom teachers did not? What drew the crowds? Did the crowds or his followers gain some wisdom from what he said?
Toto is offline  
Old 08-07-2004, 04:37 PM   #35
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 4,822
Default

If anyone saw Stigmata (where the blonde lass gets the Stigma....dur!) the movie's premise is based on the Gospel of Thomas. Have a read of that and tell me, to get the caravan, is it

a.) Wisdom

b.) Foolishness

c.) A typical day in a student's flat - bong included

d.) Schizophrenia



E[x(Bx & Sx)] Where B is bullseye and S is bullshit.
Agnostic Theist is offline  
Old 08-07-2004, 04:59 PM   #36
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Barrayar
Posts: 11,866
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Riddick
Let's say I own a Lamborghini. Further, I want to describe to you the intimate details of driving a Lambo. Do you want to hear? What purpose will it serve?

I imagine you saying "Ok, fine" and going about your normal business. More likely, you wouldn't even want to hear what I have to tell you.
There is so much useful knowledge that Jesus might have communicated. Think of all the scientific and engineering knowledge Jesus might have discussed, which could readily have been understood by the people around him, especially the Romans, who were fabulous engineers. The Romans were capable of making magnifying lenses, but did not. They were capable of performing dissections, but did not -- Jesus could easily have pointed them in the right direction. The Greeks had moved in the direction of naturalistic inquiry, but Jesus could have given them a big shove by introducing the scientific method. He could have handed them numerous useful inventions -- porcelain, the compass, kites and aeronautical knowledge, allopathic medicine, stern-post rudders, the escapement for a clock, gunpowder, rockets, and fireworks, steel-making, deep-well drilling, eyeglasses, the Newcomen steam engine -- all of which were in reach of Roman technological capabilities. He could have handed them dozens of ethical and political ideas -- human equality and brotherhood, democracy, human rights. He could have given them many ideas on the operation of government, from civil service exams to merit pay.

In short, Jesus' "wisdom" must be measured against what he could have done, were he really the Son of God. But instead, his store of knowledge, ethics, and politics, is not different from anything already known in his time. The conclusion is obvious.

Vorkosigan
Vorkosigan is offline  
Old 08-07-2004, 07:50 PM   #37
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Lincoln.ne.us
Posts: 37
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vorkosigan
There is so much useful knowledge that Jesus might have communicated. Think of all the scientific and engineering knowledge Jesus might have discussed, which could readily have been understood by the people around him, especially the Romans, who were fabulous engineers. The Romans were capable of making magnifying lenses, but did not. They were capable of performing dissections, but did not -- Jesus could easily have pointed them in the right direction. The Greeks had moved in the direction of naturalistic inquiry, but Jesus could have given them a big shove by introducing the scientific method. He could have handed them numerous useful inventions -- porcelain, the compass, kites and aeronautical knowledge, allopathic medicine, stern-post rudders, the escapement for a clock, gunpowder, rockets, and fireworks, steel-making, deep-well drilling, eyeglasses, the Newcomen steam engine -- all of which were in reach of Roman technological capabilities. He could have handed them dozens of ethical and political ideas -- human equality and brotherhood, democracy, human rights. He could have given them many ideas on the operation of government, from civil service exams to merit pay.

In short, Jesus' "wisdom" must be measured against what he could have done, were he really the Son of God. But instead, his store of knowledge, ethics, and politics, is not different from anything already known in his time. The conclusion is obvious.

Vorkosigan
I'm assuming raising the dead to life, making the blind see again, are not good enough for you? How do these measure against a compass? What good is a compass, if you can't see the needle?

The conclusion is not so obvious to some.
Riddick is offline  
Old 08-07-2004, 07:59 PM   #38
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 14
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto
This thread has to be read in context. It was a take-off on How was Jesus so Wise?

I am not sure that anything here should be taken very seriously, or at least not as seriously as some of you seem to be.
:wave: My belief is Jesus was not God he was the son of God in the flesh and he had to suffer all things that man suffered including doing stupid things.
I don't believe he was stupid.
I just think he was a man that had to experience all things including stupid actions.
jackie lee is offline  
Old 08-07-2004, 08:53 PM   #39
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Barrayar
Posts: 11,866
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Riddick
I'm assuming raising the dead to life, making the blind see again, are not good enough for you? How do these measure against a compass? What good is a compass, if you can't see the needle?

The conclusion is not so obvious to some.
What are a few stunts with blind men, against a whole world of suffering? Pure torture -- as if he were saying "Ha! I could have cured you, but I chose not to!"

In any case, the miracles of Jesus are taken from OT models. See Helms, Randel. 1998. Gospel Fictions. Amherst, NY: Prometheus, or Brodie, Thomas L. 2000. The Crucial Bridge: the Elijah-Elisha Narrative as an interpretive
synthesis of Genesis-Kings and a literary model for the Gospels. Collegeville, MN: The Liturgical Press.

Thus, those miracles do not represent real-world events. They are simple Markan fictions taken up by the later authors.

Vorkosigan
Vorkosigan is offline  
Old 08-08-2004, 02:01 AM   #40
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Riddick
I'm assuming raising the dead to life, making the blind see again, are not good enough for you?
The question is whether Jesus was "wise" - whether what he said was wise. Performing miracles is another aspect of his persona. Some of the Enlightenment figures who rejected miracles still thought that Jesus was a wise man or a great leader.
Toto is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:46 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.