spin

This little fizzer is written by someone who doesn't post here under his own name.

It is only the evidence which counts. You can't run away from the fact. You can't shift the boundaries. You either deal with the evidence or you have little useful to say.


spin

Chris Weimer

No, judge, not necessarily, and this shows your lack of comprehension.

If I were you, I really wouldn't be talking.

Which words, judge? In fact, spin pointed out words that you didn't mention that were specifically Aramaic.

The fool is played
puppet on a string
dance, little boy, dance.

Are you really saying this? And your parents named you Judge, right?

It's about logically why certain words have the suggestion that they have. As spin pointed out, libanos predates the Aramaic influence on the region, especially since the word was used in Hebrew. Here is a random website from the web (Christian, no doubt) that shows you the verses. Spin, it's painfully obvious you don't do any prior research on the subject, you merely spout and spittle these defunct arguments over and over again. If anything, it is you who are playing the game.

Chris

Chili

Not so. I would say that Gen 1-3 has nothing to do with the creation of the planet earth but that it is the place where we come full circle when we come full circle and thus without this beginning it is impossible to come full circle. That is to say, if life has a meaning we must be able to arrive at that end and if we do, we will arrive at the place we first started and know it as if for the first time.

In our mythology this would be the book of Genesis where unstructured space is the beginning and where it also is the end for the examined life. This would be the reason why in the new heaven and new earth the sea is no longer (Rev.21:1).

As I see it, it was about 6000 years ago that 'this' ancient goat herder (for all I care) did come full circle and decided to write his own story (this makes him a myth maker) wherein he exposed the beginning of the journey of life and tied it to land, water and sky. Knowledge is called water and data is land. Dry land is something we can 'stand' on because it is rationally ours. It is flat because it is only ours as opposed to the heavens (plural) that is ours via the incarnation process (our heritage is 'water' by which we are predestined) but is not rationally ours until we come full circle. To get there we must learn to walk on water and when it becomes solid (rationally ours) we will have arrived in the new heaven and earth where the sea is no longer, obviously not because that is where heaven is at.

Gen 1 describes the metaphysics of this plan, Gen 2 the physics and in Gen 3 we enter upon this journey ourselves.

But I'll stop here.

spin

in fact,


spin

judge

Freudian slip?

judge

Actually Chris I apologise for insinuating you were a fool. The problem is mine not yours.
All the best

Chris Weimer

?

Amaleq13

You said "spin" but apparently intended "judge".

Chris Weimer

Alas, it was a typo. I believe I was going to mention something about spin, but I ferget. Apologies, spin.

Search.