Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
02-16-2009, 07:00 AM | #71 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Chambersburg, Pennsylvania
USA
Posts: 15
|
Quote:
|
|
02-16-2009, 07:44 AM | #72 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Bernardino, Calif.
Posts: 5,435
|
Quote:
However, just for the record . . . A global flood would have left a uniquely identifiable global layer of mud, and in the few thousand years since it alleged occurred, there has not been enough volcanic or seismic activity to have made it go away. |
|
02-16-2009, 08:01 AM | #73 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
|
Quote:
Completely false. You know the Christian Bible is not recognised as the word of God throughout the entire world. |
|
02-16-2009, 08:25 AM | #74 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 204
|
Quote:
You're wasting your time. Even if you explained all of the science involved, rhutchin would still refuse to see the proof. My goodness, he has already called into question the reliability of observation as a means of detection. |
||
02-16-2009, 08:25 AM | #75 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Middle of an orange grove
Posts: 671
|
Quote:
Or is it that you disagree with the methods used to determine the age? If so, please tell me what is wrong with all the various methods of radio-metric dating used and why your "method" is accurate. |
|
02-16-2009, 01:20 PM | #76 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 9,059
|
Quote:
Everything depends on the assumptions that underlie the dating model. Those assumptions seem to take that which can be observed today and extrapolates them backwards in time. The Bible does not tell us the technical details of those events surrounding the creation of the universe and the physical laws we observe today may not have settled in until after that creation. From what I understand any model of the beginning of the universe has to allow for weirdness at the beginning. Maybe not. But, who really knows and how could we know? As some have opined, the universe could have been created yesterday and we would not be able to determine it. |
|
02-16-2009, 01:32 PM | #77 | |||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 9,059
|
Quote:
|
|||
02-16-2009, 01:46 PM | #78 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 9,059
|
Quote:
The Bible refers to ...Eber ...in [whose] days was the earth divided. (Genesis 10) That would seem to be significant. Some people, for instance, seem to think that Europe was once joined to N America and other continents. That separation could have had traumatic impacts. So, I am not sure that we would easily find a "uniquely identifiable global layer of mud" or stone. So, what have geologists found? I am not a geologist and I don't know. |
||
02-16-2009, 04:54 PM | #79 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
|
Quote:
The word of God is entirely subjective. |
|
02-16-2009, 04:58 PM | #80 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Middle of an orange grove
Posts: 671
|
Quote:
You can not show any incorrect calculations based on the available data, you can't even tell me how the age is estimated. And you can also not tell me, using the scientific language, why the calculations are wrong. But, you are free to impress me with your knowledge about cosmology. Go ahead! If you actually have anything at all, do you? Quote:
Now tell me WHY the methods are giving us the incorrect answer and then tell us how to correct it. If not, you should shut up! This looks like a plumber telling a neurosurgeon how to perform brain surgery and you are the plumber in this picture. This is not even funny, just dumb! |
||
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|