FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-05-2006, 07:46 AM   #691
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
Default A simple invalidation of the Tyre prophecy

Quote:
Originally Posted by Julian
Could we, PLEASE, not resurrect threads that are much better left dead? This is most annoying... Now, unless some substantive material is going be posted, let this thread go to its overdue grave.
Are you asking me or telling me? I prefer to discuss the prophecy some more. If you object, then I will take the issue to the administrators, and possibly to Internet Infidels president Jim Lippard, who is a personal acquaintance of mine and has been at my home in Florida with his wife.
Johnny Skeptic is offline  
Old 07-05-2006, 08:38 AM   #692
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Washington, DC (formerly Denmark)
Posts: 3,789
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Skeptic
Are you asking me or telling me? I prefer to discuss the prophecy some more. If you object, then I will take the issue to the administrators, and possibly to Internet Infidels president Jim Lippard, who is a personal acquaintance of mine and has been at my home in Florida with his wife.
Huh...? What are you on about? If I am not posting in RED, clearly marking my post as MODERATOR and signing with my official title, then I am just a regular poster, so chill, johnny! You may want to discuss this prophecy some more, despite the fact that there has yet to be ANY discussion of that prophecy. Read back through this bizarre, useless train-wreck of a thread. Nothing of substance has been offered by the believers. They are hoping to win by attrition. There were some decent sunbstantive posts way back in the beginning from some of the regulars here, since then it come down to:

It is!
It is not!
See my post #123,459
Oh, yeah? Says who?
Well, see my post #1,238,129
You're wrong!
I'm not. You're wrong.

Ferchrissakes, do we really need another two dozen pages of this juvenile crap?

And, you, Johnny, keep posting obvious questions that you know they can't answer. Then they equivocate. Then you ask again. Then they equivocate some more. Now, I really don't give shit, to be blunt and outspoken for a moment here, but my duties as a mod require me to read through this inane babble everytime it gets updated. The believers lost this debate a long, long time ago. This is the ultimate example of beating a dead horse, hell, a fossilized horse, at this point.

And, what's with the name-dropping that you engage in over and over again? Are we supposed to be impressed?

And to answer your question, I am neither asking nor telling. I am voicing my opinion as an IIDB poster. This is a discussion forum, remember? Not just a soapbox for those who seem to need one...

Julian
Julian is offline  
Old 07-05-2006, 08:53 AM   #693
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
Default A simple invalidation of the Tyre prophecy

Quote:
Originally Posted by Julian
Huh...? What are you on about? If I am not posting in RED, clearly marking my post as MODERATOR and signing with my official title, then I am just a regular poster, so chill, johnny! You may want to discuss this prophecy some more, despite the fact that there has yet to be ANY discussion of that prophecy. Read back through this bizarre, useless train-wreck of a thread. Nothing of substance has been offered by the believers. They are hoping to win by attrition. There were some decent sunbstantive posts way back in the beginning from some of the regulars here, since then it come down to:

It is!
It is not!
See my post #123,459
Oh, yeah? Says who?
Well, see my post #1,238,129
You're wrong!
I'm not. You're wrong.

Ferchrissakes, do we really need another two dozen pages of this juvenile crap?

And, you, Johnny, keep posting obvious questions that you know they can't answer. Then they equivocate. Then you ask again. Then they equivocate some more. Now, I really don't give shit, to be blunt and outspoken for a moment here, but my duties as a mod require me to read through this inane babble everytime it gets updated. The believers lost this debate a long, long time ago. This is the ultimate example of beating a dead horse, hell, a fossilized horse, at this point.

And, what's with the name-dropping that you engage in over and over again? Are we supposed to be impressed?

And to answer your question, I am neither asking nor telling. I am voicing my opinion as an IIDB poster. This is a discussion forum, remember? Not just a soapbox for those who seem to need one...
For your sake, if bfniii replies, I will try to limit my replies to only a few. How is that?
Johnny Skeptic is offline  
Old 07-05-2006, 08:57 AM   #694
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Washington, DC (formerly Denmark)
Posts: 3,789
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Skeptic
For your sake, if bfniii replies, I will try to limit my replies to only a few. How is that?
I am not in a position to tell you what to do. I find it hard to believe, though, that you are not able to 'prophesize' bfniii's upcoming answers. Hell, even Ezekiel would be able predict that...

Julian
Julian is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:36 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.