FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-04-2007, 05:50 PM   #71
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,230
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeffrey Gibson View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Magdlyn View Post
However, it seems the standards of Brunner and Klausner are similar to what I know of the standards of the Jesus Seminar. Just slightly more lax?
Then your knowledege of those standards is extremely incomplete.
I was asking you. Both the JS, and Brunner and Klausner as quoted above, seem to feel that the standards for authentic Jesus sayings include being catchy aphorisms which are often ironic.

You (or anyone who is reading) can expand on that if you so desire, for our elucidation and benefit. Id prefer if you kept in mind why we are here and how we are supposed to be treating each other:

Quote:
Originally Posted by IIDB forum rules
The Internet Infidels discussion forum tries to be an intellectually-stimulating environment in which users exchange ideas in the spirit of discovery. Poisoning that environment with acrimony is highly discouraged. Please exercise tact and refrain from insulting others or disrupting ongoing discussions with inflammatory speech.
Your aggressive posting style seems unnecessary to me. :huh:
Magdlyn is offline  
Old 11-06-2007, 03:05 PM   #72
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: London, United States of Europe.
Posts: 172
Default

Apologies if this has already been linked to, but this article in Biblica by Alan Watson seems pertinent to the thread.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Watson's summary
Many factors contribute to a re-examination of the story of the adulterous woman (John 7,53–8,11). This essay responds to these factors by its defense of the suggestion that the woman is a re-married divorcée, at fault not with the Mosaic Law, but with the teaching of Jesus on divorce.
Ecrasez L'infame is offline  
Old 11-06-2007, 03:37 PM   #73
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 3,058
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ecrasez L'infame View Post
Apologies if this has already been linked to, but this article in Biblica by Alan Watson seems pertinent to the thread.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Watson's summary
Many factors contribute to a re-examination of the story of the adulterous woman (John 7,53–8,11). This essay responds to these factors by its defense of the suggestion that the woman is a re-married divorcée, at fault not with the Mosaic Law, but with the teaching of Jesus on divorce.
Since the question in this thread is the pericope's "genealogy" and it's "authenticity, I think Watson's words that
In presenting a new interpretation of the pericope I will leave open its genealogy. My concern is with its meaning. My mention of the episode’s genealogy should not mislead. I am not concerned with its historicity or otherwise.
indicate otherwise.

Jeffrey
Jeffrey Gibson is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:16 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.