Freethought & Rationalism Archive

Light · 11-09-2003, 01:51 AM

A Trinity of Logic based on a singular phenomenon. Wherever the Location there has also to be LOGIC.

So why are we fighting with each other? Because we are illogical.

What is CAUSING the fighting? Too many people. Three times more than at the end of WWII.

How has this happened? People are still having too many children.

What constitutes too many? More than one.

Before continuing I would ask this question. How would YOU limit population in such a way as to prevent a damaging increase in population, and what are the factors which YOU recognise that have caused this population explosion?

The increase in population is exponential at the current time.

Mathematically this is cause by having any more than two children who would normally replace their parents.

This is the beginning of ... logic.

As population is already too big and people are having to fight for a place in society a decrease in numbers would say that therefore following the Chinese example of only having one child is essential in ensuring the sustainability of renewable resources. This is a furthering of ... logic.

Note: Many resources are NOT renewable.

That the child should be well looked after and protected from others in society as Good Shepherds should protect their flocks is a normal requirement of a CARING society which cares about PEOPLE. This is an obvious requirement for people to live in security without being robbed of everything. Again, not emotive, just calm clear and concise ... logic.

WE ... have ONE Planet, are ONE Human Race, with the possibility of only one belief in One state of being ... existence.

That there should be only one SUPREME Being is only a matter of ... Logic. Only ONE can be The Most Powerful after all. This too denotes only One Belief. (OB)

So what benefits do YOU see in a ONE Child system, especially where some people may elect, voluntarily, to have none.

If you study this long enough you will see that it reaches into every single problem there is or has ever been.

Logic would dictate that there should be one language, one currency, one set of well made and fair rules for all people. Logic.

Given that not everyone does speak the same language then the rules and currency should be the same until this question of language becomes possible, if it is really desirable. The desirability of having a single language may be logic but is it practical. I don't think so at this time. It is something for the future.

However there are a LOT of things which can be ... standardised around the entire Globe, and there is no time like the present.

What can YOU suggest that would apply logic to the way in which we ALL live here?

Thank you.

Goliath · 11-09-2003, 02:03 AM

YES! LOGIC DICTATES THAT THE TIMECUBE IS THE ONLY SOURCE OF LOGIC AND TRUTH!!

TRIANGLES ARE TO BE TRUSTED! CIRCLES ARE EVIL! AND SO IS COPPER!

seebs · 11-09-2003, 02:06 AM

Er. Was I supposed to understand that original post, or was it more of a stream of consciousness thing?

I can't help but I've stumbled across the first draft of James Joyce's seminal work on the global economy.

Goober · 11-09-2003, 02:18 AM

And I can't help but think I've stumbled across a thread destined for ~E~.

And I think Goliath was going for some parody.

Queen of Swords · 11-09-2003, 05:40 AM

Originally posted by Light
How would YOU limit population in such a way as to prevent a damaging increase in population

Plastics.

Gawdawful · 11-09-2003, 06:08 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by QueenofSwords
Originally posted by Light
How would YOU limit population in such a way as to prevent a damaging increase in population

Plastics.

Would that be plastic explosives or plastics like synthetic latex condoms, or a combination of these?

My suggestion: Soylent Green. And if you're really a good citizen, Soylent Orange.

Warren in Oklahoma

livius drusus · 11-09-2003, 06:29 AM

Light, your OP skips around a lot and suffers from a general lack of defined terms. You are not, I am afraid, likely to get constructive responses. Perhaps you might enjoy reading Logic, the 4th installment of the Philosophy forum's Introducting Philosophy series.

Meanwhile, I am sending this thread to Elsewhere.

Light · 11-09-2003, 07:11 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by livius drusus
Light, your OP skips around a lot and suffers from a general lack of defined terms. You are not, I am afraid, likely to get constructive responses. Perhaps you might enjoy reading Logic, the 4th installment of the Philosophy forum's Introducting Philosophy series.

Meanwhile, I am sending this thread to Elsewhere.

LD,

It is just that most people do not understand that all "religious" belief stems from Egypt.

You will discover that all points of reference relate back to Egypt.

It is filled only with fact and not opinion.

Most of the other discussion is purely philosophical or speculative.

You may care to read "The Stargate Conspiracy" and come to the realisation that it is not a conspiracy at all but a hint at the actual facts and the actual religious system which is operating all of the time based on the Egypt which you see at Ghiza.

keyser_soze · 11-09-2003, 07:24 AM

Well, since it's elsewhere....Livius, your name gives me an aboslute wood! I love that name....don't know why. Goes back to bottle.

livius drusus · 11-09-2003, 07:34 AM

Why keyser, I am absolutely enchanted. Thank you sweetly.

11-09-2003, 01:51 AM	#1
Light Banned Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Here, There & Everywhere Posts: 1,253	Logic Logic Logic A Trinity of Logic based on a singular phenomenon. Wherever the Location there has also to be LOGIC. So why are we fighting with each other? Because we are illogical. What is CAUSING the fighting? Too many people. Three times more than at the end of WWII. How has this happened? People are still having too many children. What constitutes too many? More than one. Before continuing I would ask this question. How would YOU limit population in such a way as to prevent a damaging increase in population, and what are the factors which YOU recognise that have caused this population explosion? The increase in population is exponential at the current time. Mathematically this is cause by having any more than two children who would normally replace their parents. This is the beginning of ... logic. As population is already too big and people are having to fight for a place in society a decrease in numbers would say that therefore following the Chinese example of only having one child is essential in ensuring the sustainability of renewable resources. This is a furthering of ... logic. Note: Many resources are NOT renewable. That the child should be well looked after and protected from others in society as Good Shepherds should protect their flocks is a normal requirement of a CARING society which cares about PEOPLE. This is an obvious requirement for people to live in security without being robbed of everything. Again, not emotive, just calm clear and concise ... logic. WE ... have ONE Planet, are ONE Human Race, with the possibility of only one belief in One state of being ... existence. That there should be only one SUPREME Being is only a matter of ... Logic. Only ONE can be The Most Powerful after all. This too denotes only One Belief. (OB) So what benefits do YOU see in a ONE Child system, especially where some people may elect, voluntarily, to have none. If you study this long enough you will see that it reaches into every single problem there is or has ever been. Logic would dictate that there should be one language, one currency, one set of well made and fair rules for all people. Logic. Given that not everyone does speak the same language then the rules and currency should be the same until this question of language becomes possible, if it is really desirable. The desirability of having a single language may be logic but is it practical. I don't think so at this time. It is something for the future. However there are a LOT of things which can be ... standardised around the entire Globe, and there is no time like the present. What can YOU suggest that would apply logic to the way in which we ALL live here? Thank you.

11-09-2003, 05:40 AM	#5
Queen of Swords Contributor Join Date: Nov 2000 Location: Canada. Finally. Posts: 10,155	Re: Logic Logic Logic Originally posted by Light How would YOU limit population in such a way as to prevent a damaging increase in population Plastics.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

11-09-2003, 02:03 AM	#2
Goliath Banned Join Date: Mar 2001 Location: Fargo, ND, USA Posts: 1,849	YES! LOGIC DICTATES THAT THE TIMECUBE IS THE ONLY SOURCE OF LOGIC AND TRUTH!! TRIANGLES ARE TO BE TRUSTED! CIRCLES ARE EVIL! AND SO IS COPPER!

11-09-2003, 02:06 AM	#3
seebs Contributor Join Date: May 2002 Location: Saint Paul, MN Posts: 24,524	Er. Was I supposed to understand that original post, or was it more of a stream of consciousness thing? I can't help but I've stumbled across the first draft of James Joyce's seminal work on the global economy.

11-09-2003, 02:18 AM	#4
Goober Veteran Member Join Date: May 2003 Location: Adelaide, Australia Posts: 1,202	And I can't help but think I've stumbled across a thread destined for ~E~. And I think Goliath was going for some parody.

11-09-2003, 06:29 AM	#7
livius drusus Veteran Member Join Date: Sep 2000 Location: Selva Oscura Posts: 4,120	Light, your OP skips around a lot and suffers from a general lack of defined terms. You are not, I am afraid, likely to get constructive responses. Perhaps you might enjoy reading Logic, the 4th installment of the Philosophy forum's Introducting Philosophy series. Meanwhile, I am sending this thread to Elsewhere.

11-09-2003, 07:24 AM	#9
keyser_soze Veteran Member Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: god's judge (pariah) Posts: 1,281	Well, since it's elsewhere....Livius, your name gives me an aboslute wood! I love that name....don't know why. Goes back to bottle.

11-09-2003, 07:34 AM	#10
livius drusus Veteran Member Join Date: Sep 2000 Location: Selva Oscura Posts: 4,120	Why keyser, I am absolutely enchanted. Thank you sweetly.

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.