![]() |
Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
![]() |
#11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 624
|
![]()
Dang. That's pretty good toto. We're not in Kansas anymore.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Bethesda, Maryland
Posts: 215
|
![]()
This is too good to pass up:
Taken from here Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: 36078
Posts: 849
|
![]()
There is a lot of darkness around that high resolution number 2. It seems evil to me.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: California
Posts: 2,215
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Little Rock, AR
Posts: 68
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Altadena, California
Posts: 3,271
|
![]()
In the The High Church of the Canis Noctis Tertius, we have a saying:
One is the loneliest number that you'll ever do Two can be as bad as one It's the loneliest number since the number one. A pox on your two!! In hoc signo vinces : 9 |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In the dark places of the world
Posts: 8,093
|
![]()
Friends, this episode of
CREATIONIST STREET was brought to you today by the numbers 2 and 14, and by the letters WTF ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 5,815
|
![]()
But two is profoundly un-Christian! That's why Trinitarian Mathematics skips it entirely, with its 1=3 doctrine.
It's an unlucky number. Cain and Abel. Adam and Eve. Hence the menage a trois of Jesus' parentage. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|