Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
09-26-2007, 04:20 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 624
|
Dang. That's pretty good toto. We're not in Kansas anymore.
|
09-26-2007, 04:27 PM | #13 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Bethesda, Maryland
Posts: 215
|
This is too good to pass up:
Taken from here Quote:
|
|
09-26-2007, 04:28 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: 36078
Posts: 849
|
There is a lot of darkness around that high resolution number 2. It seems evil to me.
|
09-26-2007, 05:36 PM | #15 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: California
Posts: 2,215
|
|
09-26-2007, 06:13 PM | #16 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Little Rock, AR
Posts: 68
|
Quote:
|
|
09-26-2007, 06:22 PM | #17 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Altadena, California
Posts: 3,271
|
In the The High Church of the Canis Noctis Tertius, we have a saying:
One is the loneliest number that you'll ever do Two can be as bad as one It's the loneliest number since the number one. A pox on your two!! In hoc signo vinces : 9 |
09-26-2007, 09:57 PM | #19 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In the dark places of the world
Posts: 8,093
|
Friends, this episode of
CREATIONIST STREET was brought to you today by the numbers 2 and 14, and by the letters WTF |
09-27-2007, 04:13 AM | #20 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 5,815
|
But two is profoundly un-Christian! That's why Trinitarian Mathematics skips it entirely, with its 1=3 doctrine.
It's an unlucky number. Cain and Abel. Adam and Eve. Hence the menage a trois of Jesus' parentage. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|