FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-06-2007, 06:37 PM   #61
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Georgia
Posts: 718
Default

Well, I just glanced at it, but I think it's from "How To Get Atheists to Jump Through Hoops," by Camus, the Killer Whale.

Craig
Craigart14 is offline  
Old 04-07-2007, 05:01 AM   #62
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 10,532
Default

To get back to serious fun, spin's breakdown argues a very structured piece.

So, we seem to be looking at a confessional remark in a piece that is poetically structured. I opt for some kind an update of, say, GMark.

RED DAVE
RED DAVE is offline  
Old 04-07-2007, 12:02 PM   #63
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
Default

If it is Mark, that means Homer is a possible predecessor.
Clivedurdle is offline  
Old 04-08-2007, 05:00 PM   #64
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 701
Default

OK, Chris, this has been great fun, but the other shoe has to drop sometime...
robto is offline  
Old 04-08-2007, 07:12 PM   #65
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: none
Posts: 9,879
Default

That's all?
Chris Weimer is offline  
Old 04-08-2007, 09:44 PM   #66
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Memphis, Tennessee, U.S.
Posts: 50
Default

Hint, plz--I'm not seeing this resolved any time soon without one.
HeretiKc is offline  
Old 04-08-2007, 09:58 PM   #67
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: none
Posts: 9,879
Default

Ask the others. Surely you don't think that no one is on the right track, do you? Scroll up (or down, depending on how you view IIDB) and see what the others are saying.

Do we have a consensus yet?
Chris Weimer is offline  
Old 04-08-2007, 10:38 PM   #68
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rockford, IL
Posts: 740
Default

The more I think about this the more I tend to suppose it is a 20th century work--perhaps even late 20th century. At first I likened it to something in the genre of Collier (who was British-born, but wrote and published in America) or Miller, during their early years (30s-40s). However, the pseudo-philosophical meanderings suggest something far less developed, by an author who has been mislead into overestimating his own insights. I wonder if it is something out of The Night Thoreau Spent In Jail (1971), or some similar liberally-edged socio-political commentary.

I remain convinced the passage is original English, not a translation. I am fairly certain it is American, though British origin is not out of the question. I still maintain that it could not possibly pre-date the 18th century. It may be a 19th century work, but I now strongly lean towards an early-to-mid-20th century date.
hatsoff is offline  
Old 04-09-2007, 04:49 PM   #69
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Southern Illinois
Posts: 162
Default

Sounds like Friedrich Nietzsche to me.
smokester is offline  
Old 04-09-2007, 07:49 PM   #70
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 10,532
Default

Quote:
Have I none, but what you may think to be god I may differ on.
Very strange, non-English sentence.

RED DAVE
RED DAVE is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:14 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.