FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-30-2008, 11:11 AM   #21
Obsessed Contributor
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 61,538
Default

Quote:
Hara-kiri is the more common term in English, where it is often mistakenly rendered "hari-kari".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seppuku
premjan is offline  
Old 07-30-2008, 11:16 AM   #22
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Midwest
Posts: 4,787
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by premjan View Post
Quote:
Hara-kiri is the more common term in English, where it is often mistakenly rendered "hari-kari".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seppuku
Good to know. My mistake. Thanks.

Ben.
Ben C Smith is offline  
Old 07-30-2008, 12:31 PM   #23
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Seattle Area
Posts: 116
Default

Was "Luke" really an "author"? If I take an existing story, weave in some other bits from other sources, then change a few words here and there to suit my own purposes, am I an "author" of the resulting work, or just an overstepping editor?
ChuckE99 is offline  
Old 07-30-2008, 07:54 PM   #24
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ben C Smith View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chili View Post
Luke may have been a woman but was not a female.
:Cheeky:

Ben.
Famales are human Ben and woman is not human or Mary would be a sinner and the Conception not Immaculate to render Christ a sinner as well.
Chili is offline  
Old 07-30-2008, 08:39 PM   #25
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 7,816
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChuckE99 View Post
Was "Luke" really an "author"? If I take an existing story, weave in some other bits from other sources, then change a few words here and there to suit my own purposes, am I an "author" of the resulting work, or just an overstepping editor?
IIRC, Luke only uses about 50% of Mark. Also, you can't forget about Acts.

I'd say that's an author.
Amaleq13 is offline  
Old 07-31-2008, 07:56 AM   #26
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Bernardino, Calif.
Posts: 5,435
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ben C Smith View Post
So why the sigh?
If I read every book I was told to read in response to a request for evidence supporting a forum poster's assertion, I would have even less time than I do now to read the books I'm most interested in.

And yes, of course I'm exaggerating.
Doug Shaver is offline  
Old 07-31-2008, 07:58 AM   #27
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Bernardino, Calif.
Posts: 5,435
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amaleq13 View Post
here are some easily extracted highlights:
Thank you. Sincerely.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amaleq13 View Post
IMO, the argument he presents is not sufficient for the conclusion but he does point out what seems to be a legitimate difference in this author's focus.
Fair enough.
Doug Shaver is offline  
Old 07-31-2008, 08:25 AM   #28
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Bernardino, Calif.
Posts: 5,435
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChuckE99 View Post
Was "Luke" really an "author"?
The term is somewhat elastic. Depending on context, there is no necessary implication of complete or even substantial originality.
Doug Shaver is offline  
Old 07-31-2008, 08:33 AM   #29
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Midwest
Posts: 4,787
Default

I have made the following distinction before between an editor and an author: An author produces a document in his or her own name, or uses a true pseudonym, while an editor produces it in the name of whoever he or she honestly thinks first wrote it. Examples:

1. An interpolator adds a paragraph to an epistle of Paul, without changing the name on that epistle. This interpolator is an editor.
2. An interpolator adds a paragraph to an epistle of Paul, and also changes the name on that epistle to his own. This interpolator is an author, and also a plagiarist.
3. A forger writes his own document and attaches the name of an apostle to it as author. This forger is an author.
4. An individual gets hold of text falsely attributed to an apostle, makes a few modifications, and republishes the text in the name of that same apostle. This individual is an editor.
5. A book publisher puts out a book of essays by individual scholars, keeping their respective names attached to each. The publisher is an editor; the scholars are authors.

I am sure there are gray areas, but I think this distinction is basic.

Ben.
Ben C Smith is offline  
Old 07-31-2008, 08:48 AM   #30
Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: the north
Posts: 12,935
Default

He certainly acted like one pre-Jedi training of course.
Trout is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:14 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.