Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
11-28-2006, 03:01 PM | #31 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Palm Springs, California
Posts: 10,955
|
Here are my wtf passages. When I read them, I realized the Christian scriptures were inspired.
John 13:34 "A new command I give you: Love one another. As I have loved you, so you must love one another. John 13:35 By this all men will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another." Romans 12:10 Be devoted to one another in brotherly love. Honor one another above yourselves. Romans 13:8 Let no debt remain outstanding, except the continuing debt to love one another, for he who loves his fellowman has fulfilled the law. |
11-28-2006, 04:52 PM | #32 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Pua, in northern Thailand
Posts: 2,823
|
Quote:
As for Jesus saying that it's no big deal ... does that mean that the fourth commandment is no big deal? Is Jesus overruling God? (Which would be strange, since Jesus also said: "Do not think I have come to abolish the law and the prophets; I have not come to abolish them, but to fulfill them"). |
|
11-28-2006, 05:05 PM | #33 | |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Palm Springs, California
Posts: 10,955
|
Quote:
Jesus overturns the Law in the sermon on the mount and elsewhere. Under the new covenant, Christians don't follow laws, but rather they are admonished to act out of love (which will often have the same outcome as following laws, but not always.) Jesus says specifically that if you follow the Law but don't have love, you are as guilty as anybody who breaks the law. Hence: Matthew 5:22 21 "You have heard that it was said to the men of old, 'You shall not kill; and whoever kills shall be liable to judgment.' 22 But I say to you that every one who is angry with his brother shall be liable to judgment; whoever insults his brother shall be liable to the council, and whoever says, 'You fool!' shall be liable to the hell of fire. 23 Paul and James make it clear: the law isn't something that Christians need to worry about, including the 10 Commandments. Their argument, like Jesus', reduces to -- if you're not killing people just because there's a law against it, and you would kill people were it not for that law, you got bad spiritual problems. Jesus replaced the OT Law with the "law of love." Here are the verses in excruciating detail: Romans 7:4 - Likewise, my brethren, you have died to the law through the body of Christ, so that you may belong to another, to him who has been raised from the dead in order that we may bear fruit for God. Romans 7:6 - But now we are discharged from the law, dead to that which held us captive, so that we serve not under the old written code but in the new life of the Spirit. Romans 13:8 - Owe no one anything, except to love one another; for he who loves his neighbor has fulfilled the law. Galatians 2:19 - For I through the law died to the law, that I might live to God. Galatians 3:10 - For all who rely on works of the law are under a curse; for it is written, "Cursed be every one who does not abide by all things written in the book of the law, and do them." Galatians 3:23 - Now before faith came, we were confined under the law, kept under restraint until faith should be revealed Galatians 5:3 - I testify again to every man who receives circumcision that he is bound to keep the whole law Galatians 5:4 - You are severed from Christ, you who would be justified by the law; you have fallen away from grace. Galatians 5:18 - But if you are led by the Spirit you are not under the law. Ephesians 2:15 - by abolishing in his flesh the law of commandments and ordinances, that he might create in himself one new man in place of the two, so making peace, Hebrews 7:12 - For when there is a change in the priesthood, there is necessarily a change in the law as well. Hebrews 10:1 - For since the law has but a shadow of the good things to come instead of the true form of these realities, it can never, by the same sacrifices which are continually offered year after year, make perfect those who draw near James 1:25 - But he who looks into the perfect law, the law of liberty, and perseveres, being no hearer that forgets but a doer that acts, he shall be blessed in his doing. James 2:10 - For whoever keeps the whole law but fails in one point has become guilty of all of it. |
|
11-28-2006, 06:43 PM | #34 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 199
|
Quote:
|
|
11-28-2006, 06:45 PM | #35 |
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Saint Louis
Posts: 3
|
jesus puzzle
actually, i just finished The Jesus Puzzle by Earl Doherty. now the whole new testament and ENTIRE history of christianity from the construction of jesus up to "jesus camp" is one giant WTF??!?!! what an amazing book! highly recommended!
-devi |
11-28-2006, 07:22 PM | #36 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Iowa
Posts: 751
|
Gamera,
If the 10 Commandments and the "old laws" don't matter why are some Christians in such a hurry to place them all over our court-house lawns, and prohibit gay marriage based on OT law? Furthermore, if the OT laws don't matter why are they in the Christian canon at all?! |
11-28-2006, 08:13 PM | #37 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: São Paulo, Brazil
Posts: 1,504
|
Quote:
Because the Old Testament is there for anyone to pick and choose whatever they like. It is impossible to have an organized religion based on "love one another", so the OT is like this old card deck for you to pick the parts that suit your dementia and apply them. As there are millions of things in the OT, you can pretty much sanction or prohibit anything you like. |
|
11-28-2006, 08:19 PM | #38 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,890
|
So Jesus got rid of the OT laws? Shows how he can't possibly be from the Jewish God. Co-option of an old religion through a figure who claims to be god, yet directly contradicts what that god called his most holy commands. Ahuh, really sound. This seems to make God a complete moron. Why would it have been difficult to have the NT message from the beginning? Because "they wouldn't have followed it back then!" Well that's fine, but than why would God say "This law can never, ever be changed, it is eternal and perfect"? It doesn't make sense, unless God is pretty stupid. I think Christianity would make alot more sense if it annihlated it's OT roots and had tried to make up it's own new religion.
|
11-28-2006, 08:34 PM | #39 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
|
Quote:
That's right! I think God should have crucified Jesus on the 7th day, instead of taking a rest. A straight case of incompetence and negligence. |
|
11-28-2006, 08:35 PM | #40 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 20
|
The first is: Genesis 1:7
followed by: what happened after the 8th day followed by: everything thereafter. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|