FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-21-2012, 01:07 AM   #101
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: England
Posts: 2,527
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stephan huller View Post
So let's look again at what DCH is suggesting.

Quote:
358/7 BCE would be the 1st year of Artaxerxes III. 490 years later would be 131/2 CE, just as the rebellion started (we know from letters from Kosiba himself he must have been in firm control of the rebellion in Feb 132 CE.
This is very, very significant. I never thought of that before. Bravo.
Artaxerxes III

Quote:
Artaxerxes III of Persia (c. 425 BC – 338 BC) was the Great King (Shah) of Persia and the eleventh Emperor of the Achaemenid Empire, as well as the first Pharaoh of the 31st dynasty of Egypt.
The l st year of Artaxerxes III is 425 b.c. - 490 years later and the year is around 65/66 c.e. Prior to the fall of Jerusalem in 70 c.e. No way, using the Wikipedia dating, for Artaxerxes III can one get to the Bar Kockbar war/rebellion of around 132 c.e.

-----------------------

Correction: That's the birth date for Artaxerxes III - 425 b.c.....

Quote:
Ochus was the name of Artaxerxes before ascending the throne; and Artaxerxes III (Old Persian: , Artaxšaçrā, "he whose empire is well-fitted" or "perfected", or Arta:"honoured"+Xerxes:"a king" ("the honoured king"), according to Herodotus "the great warrior"[5][6]) was the throne name adopted by Ochus when he succeeded his father in 358 BC.
So, 490 years from 358 b.c. takes one to 132 c.e. and the Bar Kockbar war/rebellion. Apologies David - needed to read the article further.....:redface:

The problem remains though - counting backwards, which this amounts to i.e. from 132 c.e. back to the l st year of Artaxerxes III - there is nothing in that year that connects with any return to Jerusalem.
maryhelena is offline  
Old 10-21-2012, 01:08 AM   #102
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

Believe it or not Portugal was home to one of the greatest and most authoritative experts on the book of Daniel - Isaac Abarbanel. He wrote the Ma'yanei ha-Yeshu'ah (“The Wellsprings of Salvation" מעייני הישועה) which is a book of commentary on Daniel.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isaac_Abrabanel
stephan huller is offline  
Old 10-21-2012, 01:09 AM   #103
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

I actually met some of his descendants when I was in New York and they still involve themselves in the family wine business. Here is the website for Abarbanel Wines http://www.kosher-wine.com/index.php

stephan huller is offline  
Old 10-21-2012, 01:11 AM   #104
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

One of the more popular traditional dishes in Portugal is dry bacalhau or codfish

stephan huller is offline  
Old 10-21-2012, 01:13 AM   #105
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

I would imagine that Don Isaac Abarbanel

stephan huller is offline  
Old 10-21-2012, 01:13 AM   #106
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

would probably have a glass of wine from his vineyard:

stephan huller is offline  
Old 10-21-2012, 01:15 AM   #107
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

while eating bacalhau (remember unsalted codfish is called bacalhau fresco):

stephan huller is offline  
Old 10-21-2012, 01:20 AM   #108
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

and then would retire for the day to write a book like his Commentary on Daniel:

stephan huller is offline  
Old 10-21-2012, 01:24 AM   #109
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

Now that we have introduced Don Isaac Abarbanel it is interesting to remind ourselves that the title of his classic commentary on Daniel is actually a deliberate attempt at ridicule of the Christian messiah. He was so afraid of publishing the book in its entirety while alive that it was complete outside of Portugal by Baruch Uziel Chezketo. Every step along the way Abarbanel is refuting Christian dogma and interpretation of the material in Daniel even if it isn't explicit.
stephan huller is offline  
Old 10-21-2012, 05:21 AM   #110
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 3,057
Default I flee Him, down the labyrinthine ways of my own mind.

Quote:
Originally Posted by stephan huller View Post
Now that we have introduced Don Isaac Abarbanel it is interesting to remind ourselves that the title of his classic commentary on Daniel is actually a deliberate attempt at ridicule of the Christian messiah. He was so afraid of publishing the book in its entirety while alive that it was complete outside of Portugal by Baruch Uziel Chezketo. Every step along the way Abarbanel is refuting Christian dogma and interpretation of the material in Daniel even if it isn't explicit.
The papal dogma is apparently that Christianity has dogma.

Perhaps, in a sense, there is some sort of truth in that.
sotto voce is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:07 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.