FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-25-2006, 12:10 PM   #11
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Paget's article may be purchased here for those without library access or a subscription.

eta: there is also a paper by Alice Whealey here - "THE TESTIMONIUM FLAVIANUM CONTROVERSY FROM ANTIQUITY TO THE PRESENT"
Toto is offline  
Old 12-25-2006, 12:22 PM   #12
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Malachi151 View Post
I'm not calling Goldberg's site a recent defense, I'm calling the argument that the "acceptable portions" of the TF are "statistically similar" to Luke 24 a "recent" defense of the TF, by recent I mean something that has come up in the last 10-15 years. I just used his site as an example of the basic issue.

...
I am not aware of anyone else who has picked up that argument or commented on it.
Toto is offline  
Old 12-25-2006, 12:37 PM   #13
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: N/A
Posts: 4,370
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
Paget's article may be purchased here for those without library access or a subscription.
I.e. those of us whose taxes pay for the academic's training, salary, research, and who pay for the publication and pay to purchase copies for research libraries to make it available to those same academics... we get to pay again to see it <disgust>. (Pardon me, but this scam really hacks me off).

Quote:
eta: there is also a paper by Alice Whealey here - "THE TESTIMONIUM FLAVIANUM CONTROVERSY FROM ANTIQUITY TO THE PRESENT"
Very much worth reading also.

All the best,

Roger Pearse
Roger Pearse is offline  
Old 12-25-2006, 03:04 PM   #14
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 7,816
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roger Pearse View Post
It is quite hard for my ignorant eyes to see what it says that would be useful to anyone in antiquity.
Doesn't Eusebius make it clear why he considers this reference to be useful?:
If, then, even the historian's evidence shews that He attracted to Himself not only the twelve Apostles, nor the seventy disciples, but had in addition many Jews and Greeks, He must evidently have had some extraordinary power beyond that of other men.
Amaleq13 is offline  
Old 12-26-2006, 01:51 AM   #15
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: N/A
Posts: 4,370
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amaleq13 View Post
Doesn't Eusebius make it clear why he considers this reference to be useful?:
If, then, even the historian's evidence shews that He attracted to Himself not only the twelve Apostles, nor the seventy disciples, but had in addition many Jews and Greeks, He must evidently have had some extraordinary power beyond that of other men.
I had not remembered this, actually (!). But is it much of a reason, or one that couldn't be supported by many other sources? Tertullian makes a similar sort of argument without using Josephus.

All the best,

Roger Pearse
Roger Pearse is offline  
Old 12-26-2006, 06:45 AM   #16
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Midwest
Posts: 4,787
Default

Ken Olson makes some rather powerful arguments in XTalk post 4869 that Eusebius found the Testimonium useful in virtually every respect.

Ben.
Ben C Smith is offline  
Old 12-26-2006, 06:59 AM   #17
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: N/A
Posts: 4,370
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ben C Smith View Post
Ken Olson makes some rather powerful arguments in XTalk post 4869 that Eusebius found the Testimonium useful in virtually every respect.
I found Olson's arguments unconvincing, since it was unclear to what extent the same arguments would show just the same for a randomly chosen portion of Eusebius' opus.

All the best,

Roger Pearse
Roger Pearse is offline  
Old 12-26-2006, 07:08 AM   #18
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Colorado
Posts: 8,674
Default

To repeat a question:

Does anyone have a translation of the Table of Contents of Antiquities, especially regarding book 18?
Malachi151 is offline  
Old 12-26-2006, 07:18 AM   #19
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Madrid, Spain
Posts: 572
Default

Christopher Price's reply to Olson, here, is worth looking into.
ynquirer is offline  
Old 12-26-2006, 07:37 AM   #20
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Colorado
Posts: 8,674
Default

Another question, does anyone have more of the context of the passage that paraphrases the TF in Arabic? I need this in English translation, hopefully on the Internet.

http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/humm/Topic.../josephus.html

Quote:
Arabic summary, presumably of Antiquities 18.63. From Agapios' Kitab al-'Unwan ("Book of the Title," 10th c.).

The translation belongs to Shlomo Pines. See also James H. Charlesworth, Jesus Within Judaism.

Similarly Josephus the Hebrew. For he says in the treatises that he has written on the governance of the Jews:
At this time there was a wise man who was called Jesus. And his conduct was good, and he was known to be virtuous. And many people from among the Jews and the other nations became his disciples. Pilate condemned him to be crucified and to die. And those who had become his disciples did not abandon his discipleship. They reported that he had appeared to themafter his crucifixion and that he was alive; accordingly, he was perhaps the Messiah concerning whom the prophets have recounted wonders.
What exactly was Agapios talking about here? What was his reason for making this reference?
Malachi151 is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:36 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.