Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
11-13-2005, 11:35 AM | #51 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: South East UK
Posts: 978
|
I opened up Genesis 1:1, for something called errancy wiki it seems to have more than a few factual errors in itself.
|
11-29-2005, 11:55 AM | #52 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: São Paulo, Brazil
Posts: 1,504
|
Quote:
|
|
12-06-2005, 07:31 AM | #53 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 5,815
|
I've added an ErrancyWiki link to the Wikipedia Biblical Inerrancy page.
|
11-12-2006, 07:48 AM | #54 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Carneades of Ga.
Posts: 391
|
Scriptures
::wave: We need more demonstrating that inerrantists make far-fetched rationalizatons of their reconciliation of the contradictions . We need to demonstrate that they just do not reason well . Also, why let the errantists off the hook? They read their notions into the scriptures as the philosopher Walter Kaufmann has demonstrated . And with Richard Dawkins, we can ask what are the metaphors for the Deluge and the genocides and slavery and misogyny? We need to demonstrate that one does not have to take their scriptures literally to find nonsense in them .Bishop Spong :acknowledges biblical inadequacies but continues with his biblical obfuscation . And the Quran and other scriptures are flawed!::huh: :banghead: :Cheeky:
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|