![]() |
Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
|
|
#1 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Japan
Posts: 1,148
|
Humans and animals having sex would be ethical as it might create new species which would be a good thing.
Right ? Also animals do not tend to be able to breed beyond their immediately-related species. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,612
|
'kay.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: A pale blue oblate spheroid.
Posts: 20,351
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 821
|
Humans and animals having sex would be ethical as it might create new species which would be a good thing.
Right ? Nope |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Victoria, Australia
Posts: 888
|
I don't understand your reasoning. What inherent positive value does creating more species have? Unless the new species was of some utility, it would seem to be a pointless endeavor.
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 3,440
|
1) your two statements contradict each other, the latter one is more correct.
2) prove an animal can give consent, and then we'll talk. |
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 821
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 3,440
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Minnesota, the least controversial state in the le
Posts: 8,446
|
If someone wants to send this thread over to S&S we have people who can straighten him out.
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Japan
Posts: 1,148
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|