Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
11-29-2006, 08:54 AM | #81 | |||||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Yes, I have dyslexia. Sue me.
Posts: 6,508
|
Quote:
Don't pretend to be a critical thinker, Phoenix, because you've already been "found out." Quote:
Got it. Quote:
Quote:
If Caesar decrees something to be a part of Roman Law (such as, "You shall have no King but Caesar" and this is considered a criminal act) then any trial where a ruling is concerned on Roman Law would necessarily incorporate this crime, yes? So when Pilate officially and publicly rules that he can find no Roman crime committed by Jesus, what is he declaring? Did Pilate just forget that it was a Roman crime to claim allegiance to another King? Quote:
Our posts stand as they are and anyone who cares to judge "victory" can clearly do so for themselves. I could give a fuck. I know the account as depicted could not possibly have taken place on any level; only you adamantly refuse to address the incongruities and downright contradictory (not to mention ridiculous) events as written, so that's your cross to bear. Now please whine some more about how you're the victim and have addressed all the points, etc., because, again, everyone here can just use the scroll bar as well to see you have not. :huh: |
|||||
11-29-2006, 09:00 AM | #82 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 7,816
|
Quote:
None of these suggest that we should assume that Caesar would take the unsubstantiated word of a group of Jews over that of Pilate. The Synoptic Gospels depict Pilate engaging in behavior that would get him in trouble with Caesar (executing an innocent while freeing a convict) because he was afraid of being falsely accused of engaging in behavior that would get him in trouble with Caesar. That is simply not credible as history and the examples you've offered don't seem to me to change that appearance. |
|
11-29-2006, 06:15 PM | #83 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: North Dakota
Posts: 39
|
Grrr...I just typed up a nice long reply to spin's analysis of the Josephan account, among other things, that would have (again) address Koy's concerns and Ameleq's and then blew it all away with an accidental keypress! Blast it!
Oh well, I'm sure you're all on the edge of your seats for my reply (that's sarcasm, by the way), but I don't feel like trying to type it all up again, and I likely won't find the time to address the issues again until some quiet time this weekend. |
11-29-2006, 07:40 PM | #84 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
|
Sympathy
Quote:
(And ironically enough, when I had written this the computer mysteriously shut itself down, I guess because of a power surge (my UPS fried itself recently), so I thought I was up for rewriting the above, but fortunately the browser had kept it all in its cache, offering to return to the previous session when I started it up, so I was lucky.) spin |
|
11-29-2006, 08:21 PM | #85 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Bernardino, Calif.
Posts: 5,435
|
|
11-29-2006, 09:13 PM | #86 | ||
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
|
Quote:
It's also probable that after the Jewish "conference" at Yavneh, which set the road to Jewish orthodoxy, satellite positions such as messianism would have been discouraged, ie they would have pulled the plug on christianity. Pulling the plug on the Jewish connection would be a logic response. So I must concur with Doug's summation. spin |
||
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|