FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-28-2003, 06:16 PM   #21
Amos
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Abel Stable
Pain is an indicator of physical harm - it is like a sensory alarm. Regardless of whether or not the nervous system registers the alarm, the harm is real. Alternatively, the brain can be fooled into feeling harm that isn't occurring, but the body still reacts to the sensation. So I'd say that pain is real.
But I don't deny that pain has a purpose. All our senses have a purpose and we go by them, as we must, for at least as long as our body is mortal and our brain can be fooled.
 
Old 09-28-2003, 06:18 PM   #22
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: the reliquary of Ockham's razor
Posts: 4,035
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Abel Stable
Thanks for the clarification, Peter. In retrospect, the usage seems kind of odd. Did people then even have an idea of what an eclipse is?
Yes. Julius Africanus in the early third century, in the quote given above, objects to some statement that he characterizes as saying that the darkness at the crucifixion was during an eclipse of the sun, saying, "And it cannot happen at any other time but in the interval between the first day of the new moon and the last of the old, that is, at their junction: how then should an eclipse be supposed to happen when the moon is almost diametrically opposite the sun?" I haven't looked at ancient astronomical works, but my guess is that such knowledge reflected in Julius Africanus could be found centuries before Christ.

best,
Peter Kirby
Peter Kirby is online now   Edit/Delete Message
Old 09-28-2003, 06:23 PM   #23
Amos
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by RED DAVE
From Amos:

Why should we Jews have experienced darkness when one of our many messianic preachers (and not the only one) was crucified? Rome didn't eperience darkness when Spartacus was crucified.

RED DAVE
I make a distinction between Judaism as an -ism and Jews who describe to it and here Juda-ism received the black-out.
 
Old 09-28-2003, 06:34 PM   #24
Amos
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Abel Stable
In retrospect, the usage seems kind of odd. Did people then even have an idea of what an eclipse is?
Don't be fooled by modern science. If people in those days could write a book that has the world chasing a rainbow for thousands of years to come they sure would know what an eclipse was.
 
Old 09-28-2003, 06:47 PM   #25
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 10,532
Default

From Amos:
Quote:
I make a distinction between Judaism as an -ism and Jews who describe to it and here Juda-ism received the black-out.
I assume you mean Jews who ascribe to it. Now, back then there was no real distinction between the Jewish people and followers of the Jewish religion. (Atheists were rather scarce back then.)

Frankly, without getting into accusation, I find your obscurantism frequently skirting the edge.

RED DAVE
RED DAVE is offline  
Old 09-28-2003, 06:50 PM   #26
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Posts: 374
Default

"So, now omniscience accumulates?? . . . . nevermind."


Of course it does, otherwise how could we have creation?


Omniscience is more like a key than a new room.


Or I should rather say, it's more like a key than knowledge of what all the rooms hold...
Devilnaut is offline  
Old 09-28-2003, 06:54 PM   #27
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: the reliquary of Ockham's razor
Posts: 4,035
Default

Amos said: "I make a distinction between Judaism as an -ism and Jews who describe to it and here Juda-ism received the black-out."

Red Dave: "I assume you mean Jews who ascribe to it."

Ooooh, that peeves me. It's subscribe.

best,
Peter Kirby
Peter Kirby is online now   Edit/Delete Message
Old 09-28-2003, 08:09 PM   #28
Amos
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Peter Kirby
Amos said: "I make a distinction between Judaism as an -ism and Jews who describe to it and here Juda-ism received the black-out."

Red Dave: "I assume you mean Jews who ascribe to it."

Ooooh, that peeves me. It's subscribe.

best,
Peter Kirby
Oops sorry. Who subscribe to it.
 
Old 09-28-2003, 08:19 PM   #29
Amos
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by RED DAVE
From Amos:

I assume you mean Jews who ascribe to it. Now, back then there was no real distinction between the Jewish people and followers of the Jewish religion. (Atheists were rather scarce back then.)

Frankly, without getting into accusation, I find your obscurantism frequently skirting the edge.

RED DAVE
You're welcome to follow me around Dave but for your own good, don't be so paranoid about antisemitism.

But there were pagans and the point here is that Judaism, the religion itself as it once was the source of inspiration in the mind of crucified, was left abandonned and therefore the darkness came.

It is just a metaphor for total abandonment. I.e. the house was empty and there is no one to see the sun shine coming in and the house was empty because Jesus had gone to the netherworld of his subconscious mind.
 
Old 09-28-2003, 08:24 PM   #30
Amos
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Devilnaut
"So, now omniscience accumulates?? . . . . nevermind."


Of course it does, otherwise how could we have creation?


. . . and creation generates and regenerates.
 
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:20 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.