FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-23-2010, 06:08 PM   #61
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 89
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chili View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkA View Post
I am unclear about the arguments being put by Chili and jgreen44.

Are you claiming that at the time the Inanna myth was written down the society in question had detailed knowledge of the workings of the human mind that prefigured modern psychoanalysis? If so could you please provide some evidence to support this?

To me it seems the meanings you are giving to what appear to be very straight forward texts are imaginative at best and totally without support at worst. Giving twentieth century or even late classical meanings to early iron age or bronze age texts is rather odd.
No, I would not say that but will say that modern psychoanalists are far behind. I remember seeing a line once in the OT where "it was, or there will be an evil age when old men shall have dreams." Let me explain this with saying that it is not possible to have dreams when the two minds are one. Then if I add that metamorphosis is the most basic of all human rights and consider that psyco sciences do not even know what the end is of the human expereince it would follow that it is not possible to evaluate the steps in between.

And no, I did not live back then to know first hand but I can tell you that one must wonder why it is that just one generation after abortion was introduced fertility clincs already out-number abortion clinics by at least two to one.
Sorry?

Metamorphosis the most basic human right? Do you mean Ovid or the Stones?

Your OT quote is hardly an insight into anything by the writer. It could simply mean (without knowing the context it is only speculation on my part) if only the old are dreaming of posibilities then the society is in big trouble.
MarkA is offline  
Old 01-23-2010, 06:11 PM   #62
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: 36078
Posts: 849
Default

Although I've heard numerous explanations for how Jesus was dead for 3 days and 3 nights when he died on a Friday afternoon and was resurrected by early Sunday morning, none of them have ever been convincing.

The easiest to understand, but still impossible to accept, is that someone didn't really mean an actual 3 days and 3 nights.
Cege is offline  
Old 01-23-2010, 07:15 PM   #63
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkA View Post
[
Sorry?

Metamorphosis the most basic human right? Do you mean Ovid or the Stones?
Never read Ovid and never heard of Stones but metmorphosis must have meaning of its own.
Quote:

Your OT quote is hardly an insight into anything by the writer. It could simply mean (without knowing the context it is only speculation on my part) if only the old are dreaming of posibilities then the society is in big trouble.
No, the problem is that old men still dream which is not possible with only one mind. By inference it means that few old men did dream at that time . . . or at least to place a verdict that it is wrong to [still] dream at old age.

Remember how Jesus was said that he 'was' 46 and would raise that temple in 3 days? (John 2:18-).
Chili is offline  
Old 01-23-2010, 07:23 PM   #64
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cege View Post
Although I've heard numerous explanations for how Jesus was dead for 3 days and 3 nights when he died on a Friday afternoon and was resurrected by early Sunday morning, none of them have ever been convincing.

The easiest to understand, but still impossible to accept, is that someone didn't really mean an actual 3 days and 3 nights.
Sunday as the 7th day of the week is when evening does not follow the day (from Gen.1 gaining assent in Gen.2:1 as the everlasting day that prevailed in holiness; see also on European calendars). This then is why Sunday is to be counted for 2 days in itself in that count-down for 3 days. To keep in mind here is that the light of common day is an illusion in the everlasting light.
Chili is offline  
Old 01-24-2010, 09:16 AM   #65
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: About 120 miles away from aa5874
Posts: 268
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkA View Post
I am unclear about the arguments being put by Chili and jgreen44.

Are you claiming that at the time the Inanna myth was written down the society in question had detailed knowledge of the workings of the human mind that prefigured modern psychoanalysis? If so could you please provide some evidence to support this?
This knowledge is, theoretically, innate. It is information shared by all people in the realm of archetypes. As such the concepts under discussion, such as Eros and Logos, will crop up again and again in all mythologies.
jgreen44 is offline  
Old 01-24-2010, 09:56 AM   #66
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: About 120 miles away from aa5874
Posts: 268
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chili View Post
In what I write I am going back to Gen.2 before the TOK was 'engaged' and that is when death was not known to man , which does not mean that man did not die. It just means that without a conscious mind man did not consciously know that he would die . . . and that is where we return to when we come full cirlce = after death of the ego we 'are' (as in I AM) and remain [eternal].
We become again like unto little children (the only sort of people who will ever inherit the kingdom of heaven).

Developmentally, Eden is the womb and eating of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil simply represents each person's gradual or sudden fall into (awareness of) duality. We then spend the first half of our lives identifying with the world and its dualistic concerns before, like the prodigal son, devoting the rest of our lives to getting back to where we once belonged.
jgreen44 is offline  
Old 01-24-2010, 09:58 AM   #67
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: About 120 miles away from aa5874
Posts: 268
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkA View Post
Metamorphosis the most basic human right? Do you mean Ovid or the Stones?
I think he means individuation.
jgreen44 is offline  
Old 01-24-2010, 10:03 AM   #68
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: About 120 miles away from aa5874
Posts: 268
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chili View Post
No, the problem is that old men still dream which is not possible with only one mind.
"The light of the body is the eye: if therefore thine eye be single, thy whole body shall be full of light." Matt.6:22-23
jgreen44 is offline  
Old 01-24-2010, 12:12 PM   #69
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jgreen44 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chili View Post
No, the problem is that old men still dream which is not possible with only one mind.
"The light of the body is the eye: if therefore thine eye be single, thy whole body shall be full of light." Matt.6:22-23
Except that we look with our eye but see with our mind.
Chili is offline  
Old 01-24-2010, 12:54 PM   #70
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jgreen44 View Post
We become again like unto little children (the only sort of people who will ever inherit the kingdom of heaven).

Developmentally, Eden is the womb and eating of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil simply represents each person's gradual or sudden fall into (awareness of) duality. We then spend the first half of our lives identifying with the world and its dualistic concerns before, like the prodigal son, devoting the rest of our lives to getting back to where we once belonged.
I see your theory, but mine is different.

We come as little children only because we are exhausted in our left brain and are led back to Beth-le-hem by the woman who has played us out as egocentric individuals so that later a virgin could 'reel us in' and as much as drag us to the state of mind we were at birth before this now gentle virgin could be our personal (sic) guide to Beth-le-hem, who there gives birth to the little child within (and I skipped the Annunciation here to keep it simple but that is required to to appease the deep seated human urge to abandon the child once born).

There is no such thing as good and evil in Eden. Good and bad, yes, but not good and evil, and yes, we will be like little chidlren but must have 12 ousia's on the run ("shepherds out of control") to arrive in Bethlehem and with as much as even one shepherd short we will not have a full cast of characters and will be an apostle short to support our mansion in the sky.

And no, we are effectively singular by perception in our fallen nature until we are reborn (involutional period), and become consciously aware of our dual nature after we are reborn (evolutional period) of which the first 40 months are needed to get 'crucified' and after that heaven on earth only prevails = no more dual nature.

And no, the prodigal son is involution only, but is depicted during the heavy Advent period in his life.

I have a little problem in your "be like little children" because little children are known to be good actors and so we must be "beyond theology" for this state of mind.
Chili is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:14 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.