|
Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
11-22-2003, 08:45 PM
|
#1 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Pocatello, Idaho
Posts: 437
|
Kennedy was such a hero, right!!!
What sick horse pucky!! Kennedy was to son of a guy who made his money by smuggling alcohol, in defiance of prohibition.
Talk about the Mafia running things. So, JKF was good looking, as was his wife. So!!!!!, WTF?! This very damned weekend we humans get hit with "news" about Michael Jackson and JFK!!! Gimme a break. Both were/are sick fucks!!, convicted or not!! Niether are worth our time, luzers they both are/were. JFK, Michael Jackson? Both of 'em low-lifes, as I see it. From a space-alien, libertarian larry |
|
|
11-22-2003, 09:24 PM
|
#2 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: the gulag
Posts: 3,043
|
Now that this is in Elsewhere, I believe the comment "my ass" in retort to your assertions about JFK will be sufficient.
|
|
|
|
11-23-2003, 01:49 AM
|
#3 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: midwest usa
Posts: 1,203
|
Yes he was a horrible president he was so sick that he and his brother were having sex with marilyn monroe probably at the same time.
Look at the bay of pigs invasion a complete failure. Look at Bill Clinton who tried to emulate JFK and got caught. SICK,SICK,SICK I really think that johnsen had him killed because of the scandal that would have occured if he got caught doing what he was doing.Do not forget johnson was the VP and the scandal would reflect on him when he would run. JFK was killed by a conspiracy to protect the presidency from scandal.Johnson did a noble thing.Kill the cancer before it spreads. Michael Jackson is going to meet bubba behind bars and you know what happens if bubba cannot find a use for jackson. |
|
|
|
11-23-2003, 02:10 AM
|
#4 |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: In a cardboard box under the viaduct.
Posts: 2,107
|
Nevermind, I decided it wasn't feed time.
Warren in OK |
|
|
|
11-23-2003, 04:34 AM
|
#5 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: midwest usa
Posts: 1,203
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
11-23-2003, 09:14 AM
|
#6 | |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Outer Mongolia
Posts: 4,091
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
11-24-2003, 02:18 AM
|
#7 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Pocatello, Idaho
Posts: 437
|
Humm, Folks,
My only point was that Michael Jackson and JFK ain't worth thinking about. I guess I contradicted myself with even taking the time to point that out?! Uhhh, lots of folks have been shot in the head, since JFK was! Why the hell ain't we worried about them, eh, 'cept for the fact the he was "royality". I despise all of the attention given to the English Royality. Who gives a *F*, except for those who gotta have rulers to identify with?! aka JFK.......... Now, in relation to Jacko, if I were one of the thousands of Catholic pedophile priests, I be damned pissed at the coverage he has gotten, when I didn't. It just ain't fair!!! All folks who get shot in the head, and all pedophile suspects get equal time, eh?! I know, it's a losing argument, with so many folks hangers on to "royalty and fame". With many vouyers amounst the group. Sorry I said anything, truly!! libertarian larry |
|
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
