FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Philosophy & Religious Studies > Philosophy
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-10-2007, 03:20 AM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 2,256
Default Brain Transplants

Hello everyone.

Considering the sheer amount of achievements that we have accomplished during the past few centuries, it is not unreasonable to assume that the technology for human brain transplants will be possible within the next few centuries. Since we would all be dead, this is a purely hypothetical question and therefore, it has no scientific or moral relevance in our current world.

If a successful brain transplant is performed, who would I be? Would I be the man with my body or would I be the man with my brain? Well, scientific evidence suggests that the mind is inherently connected with the brain. If our brains were altered, our perception of "self" would also be altered. If our brains were damaged, our perception of "self" would also be damaged.

If I lost my arm due to a freak accident, I would still be the same person. However, if I lost the ability to think, I would no longer be the same person anymore. If we define ourselves as the mere product of our emotions, memories, and experiences, then it is obvious that the recipient would not benefit from a brain transplant, only the donor would benefit from it.

In most other transplants, it is beneficial to be the recipient than the donor. But after analyzing these facts, it becomes apprarent that the same rule doesn't apply for brain transplants. If I was given the opportunity to recieve a brain from Albert Einstein or Isaac Newton, I would not take it. My brain is simply too deeply connected to who I am. My body is just a lifeless "shell".

So, who do you think would benefit more from a brain transplant, the donor or the recipient? If you were allowed the opportunity to recieve a brain from a genius such as Albert Einstein or Isaac Newton, would you take it? Finally, would you be willing to sacrifice your emotions, memories, experiences, and your perception of "self" for some extra added intelligence and information?

Thanks.
Condraz23 is offline  
Old 10-10-2007, 03:37 AM   #2
Obsessed Contributor
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 61,538
Default

It depends on how fluid your self is - perhaps you could accept part of his brain - the bit that does science rather than the bit that stores identity.
premjan is offline  
Old 10-10-2007, 04:17 AM   #3
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 16,553
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Condraz23 View Post
So, who do you think would benefit more from a brain transplant, the donor or the recipient?
The person with a dead brain but a living body is beyond recieving any more benefits from this world, except a decent burial.

This would present many ethical problems though. Who decides which brains are the ones which get the transplant surgery? Many many people would want it but the supply of suitable bodies would be very limited.
untermensche is offline  
Old 10-10-2007, 07:02 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: North
Posts: 622
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by untermensche View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Condraz23 View Post
So, who do you think would benefit more from a brain transplant, the donor or the recipient?
The person with a dead brain but a living body is beyond recieving any more benefits from this world, except a decent burial.

This would present many ethical problems though. Who decides which brains are the ones which get the transplant surgery? Many many people would want it but the supply of suitable bodies would be very limited.
I would take a million bucks under the table to will my body to anybody who wants to put in a new brain when I kick the bucket.
Pragmatista is offline  
Old 10-10-2007, 08:40 PM   #5
Contributor
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Alaska!
Posts: 14,058
Default

I saw a national inquirer once, that announced a successful head transplant. The guy who lived, whose body was thrown away, was refered to as the "donor."

crc
Wiploc is offline  
Old 10-11-2007, 11:51 AM   #6
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 3,288
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Condraz23 View Post
Hello everyone.

Considering the sheer amount of achievements that we have accomplished during the past few centuries, it is not unreasonable to assume that the technology for human brain transplants will be possible within the next few centuries. Since we would all be dead, this is a purely hypothetical question and therefore, it has no scientific or moral relevance in our current world.

If a successful brain transplant is performed, who would I be? Would I be the man with my body or would I be the man with my brain? Well, scientific evidence suggests that the mind is inherently connected with the brain. If our brains were altered, our perception of "self" would also be altered. If our brains were damaged, our perception of "self" would also be damaged.

If I lost my arm due to a freak accident, I would still be the same person. However, if I lost the ability to think, I would no longer be the same person anymore. If we define ourselves as the mere product of our emotions, memories, and experiences, then it is obvious that the recipient would not benefit from a brain transplant, only the donor would benefit from it.

In most other transplants, it is beneficial to be the recipient than the donor. But after analyzing these facts, it becomes apprarent that the same rule doesn't apply for brain transplants. If I was given the opportunity to recieve a brain from Albert Einstein or Isaac Newton, I would not take it. My brain is simply too deeply connected to who I am. My body is just a lifeless "shell".

So, who do you think would benefit more from a brain transplant, the donor or the recipient? If you were allowed the opportunity to recieve a brain from a genius such as Albert Einstein or Isaac Newton, would you take it? Finally, would you be willing to sacrifice your emotions, memories, experiences, and your perception of "self" for some extra added intelligence and information?

Thanks.
You may also think of Alzheimer's as a NEGATIVE transplant, parts of your brain thrown away before the rest of you is. Or does that make you a "donor"?. Problem is, there's no recipient. Just waste...
The paths of glory lead but to Alzheimer's for some unlucky ones & their families. The grave ain't so bad after that.
4321lynx is offline  
Old 10-11-2007, 12:23 PM   #7
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Posts: 165
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Condraz23 View Post
Hello everyone.
In most other transplants, it is beneficial to be the recipient than the donor. But after analyzing these facts, it becomes apprarent that the same rule doesn't apply for brain transplants. If I was given the opportunity to recieve a brain from Albert Einstein or Isaac Newton, I would not take it. My brain is simply too deeply connected to who I am. My body is just a lifeless "shell".
Thanks.
I think you're looking at it like a brain is being transplanted into your body. Actually, your brain (you) would already dead. The actual operation would be a body transplanted onto a live brain. "you" wouldn't care because "you" would already be dead. "Your" body would be donated to another recipient.

At least that's the way I would see it. Ethical dilemmas would be similar to the dilemmas involved with end-of-life issues today when the brain is dead but the body hasn't gotten the message. Other than that, it's no more than a body transplant. Just like a heart transplant. Right?
TheInerrantWord is offline  
Old 10-11-2007, 03:41 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Spokane
Posts: 576
Default

I actually read a sci-fi novel years ago that addressed this, and brought up an interesting perspective on it: The elite in society were buying children, and raising them to have healthy bodies, so that when they reached a certain age, the older person would have a fresh body to live in.
philian is offline  
Old 10-12-2007, 03:57 AM   #9
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Munich
Posts: 1,806
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by philian View Post
I actually read a sci-fi novel years ago that addressed this, and brought up an interesting perspective on it: The elite in society were buying children, and raising them to have healthy bodies, so that when they reached a certain age, the older person would have a fresh body to live in.
earliest i remember was Roger Zelazny in "Lord of Light".
Yeshi is offline  
Old 10-12-2007, 07:44 AM   #10
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Spokane
Posts: 576
Default

I never could get into Zelazny.

I was just pointing out a possible down side to the idea of brain transplant. Namely, wealthy people harvesting young bodies.
philian is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:49 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.