![]() |
Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
![]() |
#11 | |||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 3,440
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Another sign of hoaxing...he's discussing comets, not NEOs. An incoming comet from the Oort cloud would be the hardest to detect, since it would show little motion from our perspective. The chances of that happening is also obviously much less. However, he's talking multiple comets with the same path, and yet out of these objects with a shared path, two he has direct target areas, and one's a black horse. That's what angers me...there's good points and science in this, but he's twisted it around to suit whatever his agenda is (NASA/authority attacks, conspiracy, or sheer panic maker). Too much "cry wolf" things like this, and the real scientists are going to continue to have problems with funding and education of the issue, and then later we may pay the price with a real "wolf". </soapbox> |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Obsessed Contributor
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Not Mayaned
Posts: 96,752
|
![]()
One simple hole to punch: SDI has nothing to do with shooting down inbound rocks or comets.
1) All proposed interceptors are not capable of engaging targets beyond a few thousand miles. If you're up against a bad rock and the range is only a few thousand miles the only reason to shoot is if the hit is going to be a *VERY* glancing hit. Otherwise the results are either neutral (you nudge it a bit) or bad (you break it up.) 2) Every SDI thing I've seen suggested is either a kinetic kill or an energy beam. While either would kill a warhead no problem (the problems with SDI do not relate to killing the warheads, but positive target identification.) neither would do anything to something big enough that we would be tracking it. The only way to stop a rock is a rocket. Chemical fuel is out of the question, *FAR* more power is needed. If you have lots of time you might be able to land something on it that uses solar or nuclear power to accelerate bits of the target to produce thrust. Obviously this is very slow but if you intercept far out that's fine. If you've got a year, a deflection of only a few inches per second is enough. If time is critical there's only one rocket with the hope of producing the needed thrust--orion. It also has the advantage that no landing is needed, so long as your warhead control is good enough it doesn't matter what the relative velocity is between the warhead and the rock. Put enough megatonnage in the right place and hope you're dealing with a solid and not a pile of rocks. |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Contributor
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: (GSV) Lasting Damage
Posts: 10,734
|
![]()
wasn't Hoagland related somehow to the www.zetatalk.com incident (perhaps the funniest ever doomsday prediction. perhaps someone should remind the RR folks of that. I recall one fundy christian being involved on another board I go to.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 3,440
|
![]()
Hey, Planet X is still coming...it's just been delayed or something. Honest, they've got all sort of pictures of stuff that clearly points to a large object heading towards Earth. Certainly there's some logical explanation as to why every year it seems looming and close, and isn't quite here yet.
Sure, no one with a telescope and lack of faith can see the same images, but that's part of the mysticism that holds the Planet X crowd together. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Gloucester UK
Posts: 3
|
![]()
from http://www.rr-bb.com/showthread.php?t=146005
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#16 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: The Deep South
Posts: 889
|
![]() Quote:
The Doomsday List edit: this link doesn't work and I can't seem to fix it, sorry The url is http://www.2think.org/hundredsheep/s...dictions.shtml It's the end of the world as we know it, again |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 2,179
|
![]()
Thanks. That first one doesn't seem to go back very far (I think there were 100 years or so of failed JW prophesies alone) and seemed to be abandoned. The second site looks more promising...
|
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Over there. No, wait. I'm over here now.
Posts: 4,854
|
![]()
I hope that none of those people ever run for public office. They really scare me.
![]() BTW, What the hell is up with all the woman in there? Is it a board rule that if you're a girl, you have to put up some sparkly animation of some anime - flavored cartoon girl in your sig? Those things make me want to puke! |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: A combi down by the river Styx
Posts: 118
|
![]()
Thats the way it is on most boards.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Baltimore, MD USA
Posts: 17,432
|
![]()
I wonder if they've all bought bright new Nike sneakers and some Hunt's snack packs.
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|