FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-17-2012, 10:24 AM   #11
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 3,057
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stephan huller View Post
The authority of you and Tanya wouldn't be enough to establish that it was Thursday today.
But the suggestion that it is Thursday today could be supposed to inure unsuspecting readers to the notion that there is an absolute seven day week, on one day of which phoney Christians make phoney pretensions of Christianity. Which could suggest that there is belief in real Christianity, that, in the absence of even the smallest effort to persuade otherwise, is indeed incompatible with homosexuality.
sotto voce is offline  
Old 05-18-2012, 05:59 AM   #12
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: The only Carribean port not in the Tropics.
Posts: 359
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tanya View Post
The whole idea of Jesus inducting naked men into his gathering, in order to gain a brief glimpse of the kingdom of God, is preposterous.
Exept there was nothing in the Mar Saba letter that the young man was completely naked: it was recorded he was "wearing a cloth over his naked body."

He was wearing something, and would have been completely naked if he wasn't.

Maybe it was Morton Smith's bringing up the possiblilty of a "physical union" that was denied by Clement of Alexandria in the letter itself.
la70119 is offline  
Old 05-18-2012, 11:22 PM   #13
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by la70119 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by tanya View Post
The whole idea of Jesus inducting naked men into his gathering, in order to gain a brief glimpse of the kingdom of God, is preposterous.
Exept there was nothing in the Mar Saba letter that the young man was completely naked: it was recorded he was "wearing a cloth over his naked body."

He was wearing something, and would have been completely naked if he wasn't.

Maybe it was Morton Smith's bringing up the possiblilty of a "physical union" that was denied by Clement of Alexandria in the letter itself.

I prefer the hypothesis that the Mar Saba letter was in fact an ancient Monty Pythonish satire of a gay Jesus and his gay apostles written by educated dissidents against the "plain and simple religion of the christians".
mountainman is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:36 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.