FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-07-2012, 05:05 PM   #31
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Left Coast
Posts: 77
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sotto voce View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by proudfootz View Post

Your argument was

a) similar phrases could be coincidental. Maybe so, maybe not.
False.

Quote:
b) that Plato could have picked stuff up from Paul.
False.
You state it is 'It is more than possible, imv, that Plato and many more philosophers were influenced by that scripture of Paul, that had been taken, by force of circumstances, all around the known world, with Jews writing apologia to explain to Gentiles. So Plato might have been reflecting what he had read in Paul's scripture, or read about his scripture.'

You seem to be saying it's 'more than possible' there is a relationship between the Greek philosophers and the theology of christianity, then.

Only you're suggesting instead of the obvious route - Greek-speaking folks like Paul were familiar with Greek philosophy - a weird one where supposedly Greek philosophers were studying Hebrew scriptures in 400 BC to get their ideas.

Quote:
Now you are not being set a good example, pf. What you need to do, if you are to avoid suspicion as a cheat, is quote from posts. It's very easy, and will save you time, too. I'll be happy to assist you with that.
Why would I cheat? This is not a game.

I cited a perfectly logical, sound, straightforward, and simple theory with some academic support, and you counter with 'Plato likely got his concepts from the Old Testament'.

Can you demonstrate there were jews in Athens in 400 BC doing this apologetic work?

IIRC Alexander didn't conquer Judea until after the time of Plato.
proudfootz is offline  
Old 10-07-2012, 05:06 PM   #32
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by proudfootz View Post
...I think I'll stick with Plato influencing Paul - it's a much more likely scenario with a lot of scholarly support.
You mean you'll stick with Plato influencing Paul based on the evidence from antiquity???

Scholarly support has no value as evidence.

Some Scholars may support the resurrection while others support praying to the Pauline Jesus hoping to go to heaven as some kind of reward.
aa5874 is offline  
Old 10-07-2012, 05:14 PM   #33
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Left Coast
Posts: 77
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by proudfootz View Post
...I think I'll stick with Plato influencing Paul - it's a much more likely scenario with a lot of scholarly support.
You mean you'll stick with Plato influencing Paul based on the evidence from antiquity???

Scholarly support has no value as evidence.

Some Scholars may support the resurrection while others support praying to the Pauline Jesus hoping to go to heaven as some kind of reward.
As best I understand the evidence from antiquity.

Unfortunately I don't own a museum full of ancient texts and other ancient evidence. Nor have I any expertise to do much with those materials on my own if I did.

I am, like most people, somewhat dependent on scholars who have access to these materials, who can read them, and translate them, etc.
proudfootz is offline  
Old 10-07-2012, 05:18 PM   #34
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 3,057
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by proudfootz View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by sotto voce View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by proudfootz View Post

Your argument was

a) similar phrases could be coincidental. Maybe so, maybe not.
False.

Quote:
b) that Plato could have picked stuff up from Paul.
False.
You state it is 'It is more than possible, imv, that Plato and many more philosophers were influenced by that scripture of Paul, that had been taken, by force of circumstances, all around the known world, with Jews writing apologia to explain to Gentiles. So Plato might have been reflecting what he had read in Paul's scripture, or read about his scripture.'

You seem to be saying it's 'more than possible' there is a relationship between the Greek philosophers and the theology of christianity, then.
The whole Hebrew scripture was written well before Plato was born, and was known throughout the known world by then. Ergo, Plato could have been influenced by that scripture.

Quote:
This is not a game.
sotto voce is offline  
Old 10-07-2012, 05:21 PM   #35
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Left Coast
Posts: 77
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sotto voce View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by proudfootz View Post

You state it is 'It is more than possible, imv, that Plato and many more philosophers were influenced by that scripture of Paul, that had been taken, by force of circumstances, all around the known world, with Jews writing apologia to explain to Gentiles. So Plato might have been reflecting what he had read in Paul's scripture, or read about his scripture.'

You seem to be saying it's 'more than possible' there is a relationship between the Greek philosophers and the theology of christianity, then.
The whole Hebrew scripture was written well before Plato was born, and was known throughout the known world by then. Ergo, Plato could have been influenced by that scripture.
Where has this been demonstrated?

All I have seen is an assertion.

At least I put links!

Or is this your own private theory?
proudfootz is offline  
Old 10-07-2012, 05:24 PM   #36
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: On the path of knowledge
Posts: 8,889
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by proudfootz View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by proudfootz View Post
...I think I'll stick with Plato influencing Paul - it's a much more likely scenario with a lot of scholarly support.
You mean you'll stick with Plato influencing Paul based on the evidence from antiquity???

Scholarly support has no value as evidence.

Some Scholars may support the resurrection while others support praying to the Pauline Jesus hoping to go to heaven as some kind of reward.
As best I understand the evidence from antiquity.

Unfortunately I don't own a museum full of ancient texts and other ancient evidence. Nor have I any expertise to do much with those materials on my own if I did.

I am, like most people, somewhat dependent on scholars who have access to these materials, who can read them, and translate them, etc.
aa just doesn't want to see you basing your views on having 'scholarly support', as a lot of so called 'scholarship' is founded upon some pretty flaky assumptions, and an uncritical acceptance and employment of 'sources' of extremely dubious veracity.

Solid Evidence from antiquity is what is required, not wordy and evasive 'scholarly' opinions.
Sheshbazzar is offline  
Old 10-07-2012, 05:30 PM   #37
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: On the path of knowledge
Posts: 8,889
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sotto voce
The whole Hebrew scripture was written well before Plato was born, and was known throughout the known world by then. Ergo, Plato could have been influenced by that scripture.
Then you should be able to show us where and by what verses of Hebrew Scripture Plato was influenced to produce his analogy to the parts of the human body, which 'Paul' centuries latter, used in similar fashion.

If such verses exist, it should not prove difficult for you to point them out to us.
'could have been' is no evidence that he was. And without a modicum of textual evidence to provide, there is little reason to even suggest that this was the case.
Sheshbazzar is offline  
Old 10-07-2012, 05:35 PM   #38
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Left Coast
Posts: 77
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheshbazzar View Post
aa just doesn't want to see you basing your views on having 'scholarly support', as a lot of so called 'scholarship' is founded upon some pretty flaky assumptions, and an uncritical acceptance and employment of 'sources' of extremely dubious veracity.

Solid Evidence from antiquity is what is required, not wordy and evasive 'scholarly' opinions.
Unfortunately, I am not in any position to do any original research of my own. I have no ancient codices in my home, no papyri, no coins or statues to show anyone.

I read stuff by other people (some of them scholars) and evaluate it as best I can. I try to apply what little knowledge I have of human nature, logic, history, etc to the things I read and how it fits into a larger picture.

I have a sneaking suspicion that's what a lot of other folks are doing, too.
proudfootz is offline  
Old 10-07-2012, 05:46 PM   #39
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: On the path of knowledge
Posts: 8,889
Default

Some. We wish more would apply critical thinking skills to every statement. Far too many don't.
Sheshbazzar is offline  
Old 10-07-2012, 06:09 PM   #40
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: On the path of knowledge
Posts: 8,889
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sotto voce
The whole Hebrew scripture was written well before Plato was born, and was known throughout the known world by then.
Consulting various scholarly sources, the internal evidences indicate that the TaNaKa, that body of Hebrew Scripture comprised of The Law ('Torah'), the Prophets, (the 'Neveim') and the Writings (the 'Ketuvim') was not completed even in Hebrew before the FOURTH century BCE. And even then was not translated into the Greek language until the third century BCE.
Which certainly suggests that the 'WHOLE' content of Hebrew Scripture, (and at that early date no 'canon' of Hebrew Scripture had as yet even been established) -was more likely NOT available or known to Plato.
Sheshbazzar is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:29 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.