FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-25-2007, 05:18 PM   #61
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by placebo View Post
...Any regrets for editing my "Good News and Bad News" post?
No. Please review the rules that you agreed to when you signed up. Discussing moderator actions in thread is always off topic.

PM me for details if you care.
Toto is offline  
Old 09-25-2007, 05:30 PM   #62
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 1,918
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack the Bodiless View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clouseau View Post
But that has not happened here, afaik. It does not happen in most Western countries. And it has nothing to do with Biblical criticism anyway.
...Uh, most of those (or equivalents) apply, or have applied, to to the UK.

Efforts to teach Creationism/ID as Science: Emmanuel College etc.

Blue Laws: Sunday-trading laws.

Resistance to Gay Rights: Civil Partnerships only recently introduced, homosexuality once illegal (imprisonment of Oscar Wilde etc).

Laws Against Prostitution: Prostitution is indeed illegal (sort of: technically it isn't, but everthing related to it is, such as soliciting or keeping a brothel).

Support of Slavery Laws: not anymore, but the slave trade was big once. Offhand I'm not sure if the Bible was used to justify it in the UK (as it was in the US).

I could also add: constitutional difficulties for atheist MP's (particularly those who won't swear a religious oath to the Queen: also affects Republicans).

ETA: How could I forget compulsory Christianity in various private and state-funded schools?
Compulsory Christianity, eh?
Clouseau is offline  
Old 09-26-2007, 09:08 AM   #63
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,884
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by placebo View Post
I have trouble understanding how people with an IQ above 80 can believe in the fairy tale known as Christianity. This is not to single out Christians, it's just that they are predominant in the world I live. I've read and participated in most of the arguments such as God as First Cause, Argument From Design, Moral Arguments, and Pascal's Wager. Arguing these topics can be frustrating, and I think they give unwarranted credibility to Christianity and disguise the fact that it is just plain silly. Instead, I would like to focus on the absurdity of Christianity. Things that no sane person has experienced in their earthly lives. Who has ever come across a talking snake? Or seen anyone but a magician turn water into wine? In this regard I would like the board's help in compiling an extensive list of non-sensical Christian beliefs and events that even a Caveman can see are silly. If such a list already exists I would appreciate directions to it. If not I'll get it started (with sources):

(1) Talking snake in Garden of Eden (Genesis 3)
(2) Jesus turns water into wine (John 2)
(3) Jonah survives 3 days in the belly of a whale (Jonah 1-2)
The blasting of the fig tree. If Jesus, who is God remember, wanted figs, why not make it bear figs out of season? Why if Jesus is God, do you need a fig tree at all? "Poof!" "you guys want some fig newtons?".

CC
Cheerful Charlie is offline  
Old 09-26-2007, 09:20 AM   #64
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 1,918
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cheerful Charlie View Post
The blasting of the fig tree. If Jesus, who is God remember, wanted figs, why not make it bear figs out of season?
The fig tree incident was an acted parable of hypocrites and their fate.
Clouseau is offline  
Old 09-26-2007, 09:26 AM   #65
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Washington, DC (formerly Denmark)
Posts: 3,789
Default

To briefly touch upon a prior section of this thread. While there is a demonstrated inverse relationship between IQ/education and religiousity, there are obviously many christians who are quite clever in many other ways. I think that Michael Shermer said it best when he said, "Smart people are very good at rationalizing things that they came to believe from non-smart reasons."

Julian
Julian is offline  
Old 09-26-2007, 09:39 AM   #66
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 1,918
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Julian View Post
To briefly touch upon a prior section of this thread. While there is a demonstrated inverse relationship between IQ/education and religiousity, there are obviously many christians who are quite clever in many other ways.
That's a remarkably bigoted remark until and unless one can prove that religion is folly. As that has never been achieved, it's unlikely to happen now.
Clouseau is offline  
Old 09-26-2007, 09:57 AM   #67
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clouseau View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Julian View Post
To briefly touch upon a prior section of this thread. While there is a demonstrated inverse relationship between IQ/education and religiousity, there are obviously many christians who are quite clever in many other ways.
That's a remarkably bigoted remark until and unless one can prove that religion is folly. As that has never been achieved, it's unlikely to happen now.
God by definition is outside your means of comprehension. You have no objective means of perceiving god. There is no way that you can make objective your belief in god. If you cannot show objective reasons for your view of reality, you are no different from the schizophrenic whose reality is not objective. We normally consider what schizophrenics believe to be folly. Shouldn't we consider religions with their non-objective world structures to be folly as well?


spin
spin is offline  
Old 09-26-2007, 10:28 AM   #68
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Birmingham UK
Posts: 4,876
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Julian View Post
To briefly touch upon a prior section of this thread. While there is a demonstrated inverse relationship between IQ/education and religiousity, there are obviously many christians who are quite clever in many other ways. I think that Michael Shermer said it best when he said, "Smart people are very good at rationalizing things that they came to believe from non-smart reasons."

Julian
The inverse relation between education and religiosity is IIUC currently true in the USA (I'm not aware of data about IQ and religiosity but quite possibly the same relation holds)

I have doubts how far it applies across time and across cultures.
For example in the UK there is traditionally, a very low level of formal religiosity (eg church attendance) among the unskilled working class.
And IMS and IIUC the current (weak) inverse relation between education and religiosity in the USA may not have been valid in the mid 20th century.

Andrew Criddle
andrewcriddle is offline  
Old 09-26-2007, 12:10 PM   #69
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Paradise! aka Panama City Beach, Fla. USofA
Posts: 1,923
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clouseau View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cheerful Charlie View Post
The blasting of the fig tree. If Jesus, who is God remember, wanted figs, why not make it bear figs out of season?
The fig tree incident was an acted parable of hypocrites and their fate.
You don't say... still bad for the fig tree. Jesus should just make non-hypocrites, and leave the fig trees out of it.


How does someone know they are a hypocrite when it comes to knowing God, how do you know you are not a hypocrite, Clouseau? Don't really see you producing any figs here [meaning IIDB, who knows in the world you might be a fig farmer] lately.

Quote:
Originally Posted by spin View Post
God by definition is outside your means of comprehension. You have no objective means of perceiving god. There is no way that you can make objective your belief in god. If you cannot show objective reasons for your view of reality, you are no different from the schizophrenic whose reality is not objective. We normally consider what schizophrenics believe to be folly. Shouldn't we consider religions with their non-objective world structures to be folly as well?spin
Schizophrenics don't realize they are schizophrenics, any more than a hypocrite would realize they are a hypocrite, would they?
DISSIDENT AGGRESSOR is offline  
Old 09-26-2007, 04:08 PM   #70
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Some posts have been split off here
Toto is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:33 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.