FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-09-2008, 01:16 PM   #51
Perm
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jenny911 View Post
For some reason the vid posted is the wrong one, you're not getting the point because of that, anws here's the right one: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JS1WlP2a4_s

Btw someone said they dont have time to sit through a vid, it's only 6 min

You'll see the acurateness of the prophecies there in a short and concise manner. Bible prophecy isn't wishful thinking. See for yourself!
@Mods: aren't there rules against this? Jenny, while I'm sure she means well, is not engaging in any debate, she's proselytizing.

@Jenny: the gentle, eloquent nudging towards doing research didn't seem to work, so I'll try a different approach. Your biblical prophecies are complete bullshit, just like every other religion that claims to know the "truth" about supernatural deities. If you can't deal with that fact, then go climb back in your Christian hole and wallow in your ignorance. No one here will be worse for it.
 
Old 01-09-2008, 01:19 PM   #52
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Pale Blue Dot
Posts: 463
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mageth View Post
And this nonsense would only impress someone who already believed:

http://www.proofdirectory.com/Prophe...robability.htm
From the link:
Quote:
Since the probability for any one of these prophecies having been fulfilled by chance averages less than one in ten (figured very conservatively) and since the prophecies are for the most part independent of one another, the odds for all these prophecies having been fulfilled by chance without error is less than one in 102000 (that is 1 with 2000 zeros written after it)!
I believe that number is larger than the estimated number of particles in the known universe! Truly amazing indeed! (...that any one could believe it.)

Ironicly that number is even beyond Dembski's 'probability boundry' making it theoretically impossible.
Darklighter is offline  
Old 01-09-2008, 01:24 PM   #53
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Perm View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jenny911 View Post
For some reason the vid posted is the wrong one, you're not getting the point because of that, anws here's the right one: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JS1WlP2a4_s

Btw someone said they dont have time to sit through a vid, it's only 6 min

You'll see the acurateness of the prophecies there in a short and concise manner. Bible prophecy isn't wishful thinking. See for yourself!
@Mods: aren't there rules against this? Jenny, while I'm sure she means well, is not engaging in any debate, she's proselytizing....
It's not necessarily a rules violation, but it may get this thread sent to Elsewhere if the mods decide it lacks serious content. If you want mod action, please use the "report post" button, don't ask in thread.
Toto is offline  
Old 01-09-2008, 01:29 PM   #54
Perm
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Perm View Post

@Mods: aren't there rules against this? Jenny, while I'm sure she means well, is not engaging in any debate, she's proselytizing....
It's not necessarily a rules violation, but it may get this thread sent to Elsewhere if the mods decide it lacks serious content. If you want mod action, please use the "report post" button, don't ask in thread.
Eh, it was more of a side question that I thought others may comment or correct me on. For example: [random user] "No Perm, you must have missed post 666 where Jenny clearly refuted x, y and z."

Plus I wanted to whack Jenny over the head with a club to see if she'd snap out of her stupor long enough to come up with an intelligent response.
 
Old 01-09-2008, 01:31 PM   #55
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Darklighter View Post
I believe that number is larger than the estimated number of particles in the known universe! Truly amazing indeed! (...that any one could believe it.)

Ironicly that number is even beyond Dembski's 'probability boundry' making it theoretically impossible.

Aside from that entire argument being an "argument from a really big number" (woo!) and an argument from incredulity (that's incredible!), they appear to have for the most part pulled various probability estimates out of their asses.

E.g., the probability of Jesus being born in Bethlehem, as "prophecied", is set at 1 in 10^5 (1 in 100,000). How many towns were there in Israel at the time? The number just doesn't appear to jibe with the population of the country.

Another laugher was the one about the "50 prophets" that "prophecied" the "day of Elijah's supernatural departure from Earth." That's in an incredible story that includes rivers getting slapped with cloaks and parting, and flaming chariots descending from Heaven to carry people off.
Mageth is offline  
Old 01-09-2008, 01:33 PM   #56
Perm
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Darklighter View Post
Ironicly that number is even beyond Dembski's 'probability boundry' making it theoretically impossible.
Here's a prophecy for you regarding Jenny's rationale: "Impossible?! Through Jesus Christ, anything is possible!"
 
Old 01-09-2008, 01:46 PM   #57
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Pale Blue Dot
Posts: 463
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Perm View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darklighter View Post
Ironicly that number is even beyond Dembski's 'probability boundry' making it theoretically impossible.
Here's a prophecy for you regarding Jenny's rationale: "Impossible?! Through Jesus Christ, anything is possible!"
LOL - You don't pull punches do you?
Darklighter is offline  
Old 01-09-2008, 01:50 PM   #58
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Pale Blue Dot
Posts: 463
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mageth View Post
Aside from that entire argument being an "argument from a really big number" (woo!) and an argument from incredulity (that's incredible!), they appear to have for the most part pulled various probability estimates out of their asses.
Haha I remember in the not-so-distant past when such arguements used to amaze me... and than I made the mistake of thinking rationally about them.
Darklighter is offline  
Old 01-09-2008, 03:00 PM   #59
Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Austin
Posts: 16,498
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Darklighter View Post
(They should have made it seven minutes, because six is the number of imperfection. J/K :Cheeky: )
OT: (Actually, mathematically speaking, 6 is the first perfect number (a technical term for) being a number that is both sum and multiple of the same three numbers. And they are special numbers, at that: 1 (the only integer neither prime nor non-prime), 2 (the only even prime) and 3 (the first odd prime).) :devil1: :devil3: :angel:
George S is offline  
Old 01-09-2008, 03:01 PM   #60
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
Default

I think Darklighter was referring to numerology, not mathematics.
Mageth is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:46 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.