FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Non Abrahamic Religions & Philosophies
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-17-2006, 05:36 PM   #91
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: I've left FRDB for good, due to new WI&P policy
Posts: 12,048
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Helo
Atheism just strikes me as a very cold, dead way to look at a world that, atleast to me, looks the exact opposite.
Atheism is not a way of looking at the world. But if I discovered that the world was purpose-built it would take away all the "magic." Life, then, becomes nothing more than fitting in with someone else's purpose. There can be no wonder at all if there is a reason for existence.
Autonemesis is offline  
Old 04-17-2006, 05:38 PM   #92
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 260
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sourdough
IF you KNEW this one life is all you have wouldnt you apreciate it more than anything?
Indeed. If there is an after-life, what is the point of this one? Seems to me that is a very cold, dead way to look at the world.
sunspark is offline  
Old 04-17-2006, 06:10 PM   #93
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Florida or North Caro, depending on the time of ye
Posts: 60
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Helo
Ok, right off the bat lets get something straight. Im not trying to be offensive or rattle anyone's cage, Im asking an honest question out of honest curiosity and I'd appreciate an honest answer. I dont mean to sound condescending, I have the utmost respect for other people's beliefs.

Ive always looked at the world with a certain ammount of wonder, in my eyes theres so many things in this world that I find it difficult to say "EVERYTHING has a scientific or rational explanation."

I just....I have a hard time understanding how certain people can look at the world and NOT believe that theres atleast some type of higher power or atleast some idea that we as people cant see or test for.
I'm really really laid back, I have an off-color sense of humor, I'm easy to amuse, and it doesn't seem to bother me that I'm a small thing on an infinitesmal dot which orbits around one of millions of flea-speck stars within a galaxy that appears as a microscopic dot on a map of a universe in which my existence is all but irrelevant, probably mainly because I wouldn't feel comfortable with the attention of something as large as the universe and am glad that I don't have it. That's how. I would have thought that this would be fairly plain.
Intentional Pariah is offline  
Old 04-17-2006, 08:02 PM   #94
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: secularcafe.org
Posts: 9,525
Default

Helo, atheism isn't a complete worldview, by any means. It's only an element of a worldview- it just means that we lack belief in god(s). Even when we call ourselves atheists, we aren't saying anything about our sense of humor, or politics, or lifestyle, or morality. We on this board span an amazing range of types and temperaments.

Tell you what. If you think atheists are necessarily cold and humorless, go to this thread and follow some of the links in it. (Be careful that you aren't drinking or eating anything, and aren't anywhere loud laughter will get you in trouble!)
Jobar is offline  
Old 04-17-2006, 08:55 PM   #95
J-D
Moderator - General Religious Discussions
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: New South Wales
Posts: 27,330
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Helo
To me personally, science is one way of looking at events and interpreting what people see. That doesnt make it WRONG, it just makes it different.
Until you tell us what you think it's different from, and how you think it's different, that's an empty statement.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Helo
I think theres scientific explanations for ALMOST everything,
Can you indicate the things that you think there are no scientific explanations for, and why you think that? If not, what foundation do you have for supposing that there are scientific explanations for almost everything, but not for everything?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Helo
Im a believer in the power of science but I also think that if you rely completely on science and discard any real real leaps of faith, your doing the exact same thing you hold a theist for doing, you just hold different ground.
If you're on different ground, then it's not the exact same thing. Between any two examples, there are always similarities and differences, so inevitably there are both similarities and differences between what scientists do and what theists do (never mind that lots of scientists are theists). Until you tell us what you think the significant similarities (or differences) are, this is another empty statement.
J-D is offline  
Old 04-18-2006, 05:57 AM   #96
Contributor
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Canada. Finally.
Posts: 10,155
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Helo
Thats called gambling.
I take it that you have no answer to make to my request? I asked what "real real leaps of faith" you think people should make, but you provided none. Perhaps you have not thought this matter through very well.
Queen of Swords is offline  
Old 04-18-2006, 07:19 AM   #97
Contributor
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Saint Paul, MN
Posts: 24,524
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Queen of Swords
So tell me what "real real leaps of faith" you think people should make. For instance, let's say that you have a funny pain in your head that comes and goes. Should you assume that this is someone trying to make a psychic connection with you and should you start sending out thoughts? Or should you go and see a doctor instead, just in case you have a brain tumor?

"Real real leaps of faith" is bit vague. I'd like to know more about what these were before I considered making any.
Hmm. I think more at the worldview level; for instance, the question of whether or not you should care about people. Getting married is, IMHO, a leap of faith; even if you have some evidence that you like someone, I don't think marriage can be justified on available evidence that exists prior to the first decade or so of marriage. What happens if your spouse figures out eleven years in that he/she is actually transsexual? What happens if there's an affair? Shit happens, and marriage is a pretty big gamble.

Adopting nearly any moral system or system of values involves taking at least one value proposition which is, by definition, unsupportable. If you have evidence about your "values", then you're looking at the implications of a foundational value judgment. It may seem totally unexceptional to adopt a value judgment such as "I want to be happy" or "I want to make other people happy" -- but given the huge difference it makes which of those you pick, I think it's a pretty big deal.

What is or isn't a question of faith may vary from one person to another. For me, the notion that other people actually have internal state is pretty close to faith. I don't read expressions well, and I have nearly no native empathy. I choose to believe that these things ("other people") are fully real even though I don't have the perceptual experience of them that I am assured is normal. My colorblind friend takes it on faith that people are telling him accurately whether things clash.

One occasionally sees advice like "live as though your choices will make a difference". I think this is a kind of faith, and a very useful one.
seebs is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:36 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.