![]() |
Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
![]() |
#141 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2002
Location: New York City
Posts: 1,617
|
![]()
Georgia drops plan to remove the word "evolution" from school curriculum
Edited to add: Oops! I see this was already reported on this thread! |
![]() |
![]() |
#142 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: OK
Posts: 267
|
![]()
Any word on whether or not they're just putting "evolution" back in the standards and not the deleted text?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#143 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NCSU
Posts: 5,853
|
![]() Quote:
Cox et al. haven't yet admitted to removing anything other than "the one word." In fact the opposite is true, department spokesmen have flat out lied and stated that "only the one word is missing; the theory and underlying concepts are there." This is nothing but a smokescreen to get people to think that we have won. The petition has died up. Whereas it was growing at about a rate of 1,000 a day, today saw less than 300 signatures added. Twelve thousand is a good number but the drop off has me worried that the public will stop paying attention. I've been going around today informing people that there is a lot of work left to be done. My analysis page is very helpful in convincing people about what is actually going on with the life science standards. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#144 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: southeast
Posts: 2,526
|
![]()
Well, at least the press is starting to catch on. Today's AJC article clearly mentions that the word 'evolution' was not the only thing removed:
'Evolution' back in teaching plan Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#145 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: US east coast. And www.theroyalforums.com
Posts: 2,829
|
![]()
I liked the statement about how it's great that she put the word back and now she needs to put the science back. I wonder if the publicity about the omissions will force her to do it or what sort of excuses she'll come up with for knowing better than the AAAS.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#146 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NCSU
Posts: 5,853
|
![]()
I found this on Alton Brown's Blog:
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#147 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NCSU
Posts: 5,853
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#148 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Morris, MN
Posts: 3,341
|
![]()
I strongly suspect that the "evolution word" controversy was really a stalking horse for the other shenanigans they've pulled on actually teaching evolution. They distracted the media for the time necessary, now they'll just pretend there is no further problem.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#150 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: OK
Posts: 267
|
![]()
Teaching Evolution
Feb. 6, 2004 According to the Georgia Department of Education, the word evolution is a "controversial buzzword" that should be removed from the state's biology curriculum. In this hour, we'll take a look at science education in schools. Should evolution be out? And what should science class teach us about the age and origins of the universe? Join NPR's Ira Flatow for a look at new challenges to teaching evolution in public schools. Guests: Eugenie C. Scott *Director of the National Council for Science Education Lawrence Krauss *Ambrose Swasey professor of physics and chairman of the physics department at Case Western Reserve University *Director of the Center for Education and Research in Cosmology and Astrophysics at Case Western Reserve University |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|