Freethought & Rationalism Archive

ApostateAbe · 10-02-2012, 08:12 AM

dave31, rest assured, the media of acharya s will be a central component of the wiki.

outhouse · 10-02-2012, 08:16 AM

Quote:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I would like to set up a Wiki, an online encyclopedia, that compiles and critically analyzes mythicist claims

isnt anyone worth mentioning already in the historical jesus wiki page?

they get there paragraph on the topic, do they really deserve more?

ApostateAbe · 10-02-2012, 08:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by outhouse

Quote:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I would like to set up a Wiki, an online encyclopedia, that compiles and critically analyzes mythicist claims

isnt anyone worth mentioning already in the historical jesus wiki page?

they get there paragraph on the topic, do they really deserve more?

I would like something more comprehensive and directed, much like the Index to Creationist Claims.

aa5874 · 10-02-2012, 09:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ApostateAbe

Quote:

Originally Posted by outhouse

Quote:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I would like to set up a Wiki, an online encyclopedia, that compiles and critically analyzes mythicist claims

isnt anyone worth mentioning already in the historical jesus wiki page?

they get there paragraph on the topic, do they really deserve more?

I would like something more comprehensive and directed, much like the Index to Creationist Claims.

Again, Creationists and HJers use the Bible as a Credible source of History.

MJers vehemently argue that the Bible is a fundamental source of Mythology.

outhouse · 10-02-2012, 09:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ApostateAbe

Quote:

Originally Posted by outhouse

isnt anyone worth mentioning already in the historical jesus wiki page?

they get there paragraph on the topic, do they really deserve more?

I would like something more comprehensive and directed, much like the Index to Creationist Claims.

fair enough

Sheshbazzar · 10-02-2012, 10:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aa5874

Quote:

Originally Posted by ApostateAbe

Quote:

Originally Posted by outhouse

Quote:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I would like to set up a Wiki, an online encyclopedia, that compiles and critically analyzes mythicist claims

isnt anyone worth mentioning already in the historical jesus wiki page?

they get there paragraph on the topic, do they really deserve more?

I would like something more comprehensive and directed, much like the Index to Creationist Claims.

Again, Creationists and HJers use the Bible as a Credible source of History.

Except in every case where the Bible's accounts disagrees with their cherished imaginary scenarios and theories.

aa5874 · 10-02-2012, 10:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sheshbazzar

Quote:

Originally Posted by aa5874

Quote:

Originally Posted by ApostateAbe

Quote:

Originally Posted by outhouse

Quote:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I would like to set up a Wiki, an online encyclopedia, that compiles and critically analyzes mythicist claims

isnt anyone worth mentioning already in the historical jesus wiki page?

they get there paragraph on the topic, do they really deserve more?

I would like something more comprehensive and directed, much like the Index to Creationist Claims.

Again, Creationists and HJers use the Bible as a Credible source of History.

Except in every case where the Bible's accounts disagrees with their cherished imaginary scenarios and theories.

HJers are far worse than Creationists.

At least the Creationist do NOT discredit the Bible.

HJers on the other hand admit and confirm that the BIBLE is historically problematic filled with discrepancies and contradictions but still use it for the history of their Jesus.

Even inerrantists are in a far better position than HJers.

Inerrantists do NOT make stuff about Jesus.

The human Jesus was completely fabricated by HJers.

ApostateAbe · 10-02-2012, 10:41 AM

I use some of the texts of the Bible as a source of history, but not a credible source. Disagree with that approach?

Sheshbazzar · 10-02-2012, 11:15 AM

Posts #15 & 17.

If it is not credible as a source of history, then it is not worth the paper it is written on as a source of credible history.

.

ApostateAbe · 10-02-2012, 11:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sheshbazzar

Posts #15 & 17.

If it is not credible then it is not worth the paper it is written on as a source of credible history.

.

OK, would you count any ancient text of any sort as a source of ancient history? If so, give me an example.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

10-02-2012, 08:12 AM	#21
ApostateAbe Contributor Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: MT Posts: 10,656	dave31, rest assured, the media of acharya s will be a central component of the wiki.

10-02-2012, 10:41 AM	#28
ApostateAbe Contributor Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: MT Posts: 10,656	I use some of the texts of the Bible as a source of history, but not a credible source. Disagree with that approach?

10-02-2012, 11:15 AM	#29
Sheshbazzar Veteran Member Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: On the path of knowledge Posts: 8,889	Posts #15 & 17. If it is not credible as a source of history, then it is not worth the paper it is written on as a source of credible history. .

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.