![]() |
Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
![]() |
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 2
|
![]()
With a huge amount of wars being because of religion or religious beliefs. And with the amount of casualitys caused by these wars. Can you draw the bow between religion and terrorism. :devil3: Or is that reaching to far. :angel:
Terrorism As defined by the FBI, "the unlawful use of force against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population or any segment thereof, in the furtherance of political or social objectives". This definition includes three elements: (1) Terrorist activities are illegal and involve the use of force. (2) The actions are intended to intimidate or coerce. (3) The actions are committed in support of political or social objectives. (FEMA-SS) The biggest question is for me, is defining "unlawful" when it comes to religion |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Austin, TX, USA
Posts: 4,930
|
![]()
Let's see how this does in GRD.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
New Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 2
|
![]()
so is this to hard to comment on
![]() or is it to stupid to waste time on :down: |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Abu Dhabi Europe and Philippines
Posts: 11,254
|
![]() Quote:
However in seeking to eradicate the roots of terrorism we can't just intimate that this is all caused for instance by religion. Were WWI and WWII the result of religion? Were the Red Guards religious or Stalins Camps the World Trade Centre bombings etc. Did Adolph Hitler, Pol Pot conduct holy wars. No they conducted the opposite. Sure, there are bitgots,fanatics power crazed individuals and other destructive elemensts who once entrenched in positions of power will use religion as an excuse or will use ...ism as an excuse. Religion is a convenient vehicle because it is there. POINT 1 There is no problem in defining what is unlawful when it comes to religion. IF someone commits murder and says God told him, or it was for a religious cause they are still terrorists criminals etc. There has never been any confusion in law. POINT 2 can be a difficult area, but not if the facts are straight. Individuals will have a differing impression of this, but if there is a good case it can be proven. Not only does this apply to religion but to selling,someone in a local team being pushed to attend matches he doesn't want to. Intimidation with threats of violence however are easier to prove. Cases can get confused when third parties are involves as they are just giving an interpretation true or false of the events. POINT 3 Actions to promote social or political objectives should not be above the law and are not. However at times this will have to go to civil courts. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 8,345
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Abu Dhabi Europe and Philippines
Posts: 11,254
|
![]() Quote:
I don't see examples enforcement by kidnapping, murder, arson, arms dealing and purchasing harrasment of governments and individuals etc. I see this paragraph In the time of Duarte Nunes, support of the Portuguese military allowed the Jesuits to have Hindus forcibly seized and their lips smeared with pieces of beef, 'polluting' them as Hindus and thus making Christianity their only option for salvation.[14] Such blatancy is not possible today. It also mentions reported scandels etc that rarely reach Eu etc It's basically an article critisizing Evangelism's quest to conquer the world, so what? Not everyone is obliged to join of course. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Brandon, Mississippi
Posts: 1,892
|
![]()
The apostle Paul openly confessed that BEFORE he embraced true religion, he his zeal led him to persecute and try to destroy the church. The more zealous he became, the more terror and destruction he brought. This is not only true of Paul, but of all men, because apart from the gospel, man is filled with self-centeredness, enmity, strife and every other form of evil.
On the other hand, Paul, AFTER experiencing regeneration and sanctification, was one who was willing to lay down his life for others. The more a person becomes gospel driven, the more loving we will become not only to God but to our fellow man. That's seen in the demand of the gospel, "to love God with all our heart, soul, mind, and strength, and to love our neighbor as ourself" True religion ... that which is found by grace through faith alone in Christ ... is the answer to the Terrorism, Hatred, and Bloodshed we find in our world. |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | ||||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 8,345
|
![]() Quote:
I give this definition just so we're clear. You left off the last sentence of the quote you sited. It reads: Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
BL |
||||
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|