Freethought & Rationalism Archive

Javaman · 03-05-2005, 02:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WILLOWTREE

Jewish sources say it is authentic.

But not ancient. It is probably an authentic document but can not be the book of Jasher/songs mentioned in the OT.

Quote:

Originally Posted by WILLOWTREE

The Bible itself cites it two times.

It cites a book but this can not be that book.

Quote:

Originally Posted by WILLOWTREE

I provided unsubstantiated proof of one claim.

What the hell is that worth? You can either provide an unsubstantiated claim or you can provide proof.

Quote:

Originally Posted by WILLOWTREE

Spin the Atheist asserts it not authentic.

I don't think that's what he wrote.

Regardless, you have asserted that this cloak somehow helped Noah with the animals. You are merely guessing and so far have not provided anything resembling an argument. This thread will continue to meander until you do.

spin · 03-05-2005, 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WILLOWTREE

Spin:

Let me put it this way:

If an idiot like Benny Hinn said the Book Jasher was authentic this would refute your typical atheist assertions and rhetoric saying it isn't.

But in reality, the brightest Biblical scholar of all time, a man who has collected ancient Bible's and mss in the same league (and surpassing in many areas) the Huntington, N.Y. Central, and the British Museum, a man who has mastered Greek, Hebrew, Ethiopic, Aramaic, Syriac, Arabic, Latin, and Armenian ancient languages says the book of Jasher is authentic.

Jewish sources say it is authentic.

The Bible itself cites it two times.

I provided unsubstantiated proof of one claim.

Spin the Atheist asserts it not authentic.

I invoke a moron like Benny Hinn to give you a reference point as to the weight of your assertions.

WT

In short, you haven't got a skerrick of a clue how we got this book called SPR H-Y$R.

It couldn't have been written by anyone with a good knowledge of rabbinical Hebrew at any time before 1552.

You are totally ignorant of the material you are basing your ravings on.

You are a waste of time, as you can't give thoughts outside your own any value.

Sit in your sty of contentment and think that anyone who doesn't kow-tow to your meandering machinations, must be labelled and compartmentalised so that you don't have to think about what those people say. They are atheists, Darwinists, agnostics, secular thinkers, anything but people who have ideas which are possibly worth thinking about.

Those who sit in the sty of contentment...

spin

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.