FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-18-2013, 12:36 PM   #101
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheshbazzar View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chili View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheshbazzar View Post
the bible tells us of the EL of israEL what a incredible EL above all of the ELohim was he.

is this enough to get me permanently banned? or does it take seven EL s?
I would write this just the other way around to read Is-ra-el and be one with god instead of worship him. And in case you wonder, his ears are on your own head and shouting is not needed.
Yes Chili, but it was for the writing of EL that Bingo the Clown-o wished to me banned,
so the Is-ra-el simply would not have worked.

Still waiting to see if I will get banned for not spelling here the way that the Clown-o wants me too.
Ah, good for you. I am just a casual observer and should really shut up.
Chili is offline  
Old 01-18-2013, 12:37 PM   #102
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

And remember I am not really suggesting that the person that starts the thread becomes a moderator. Let me correct that if it is thought I said it. I just thought at the outset he could restrict who could participate in his thread. I only suggested that because I hate to ask Toto to split basically every comment from Pete, tanya, chili et al. But now that I think of it I guess I can bother him every five minutes or so. I just thought I was being charitable.

The second point about my use of sex as a metaphor for everything. First, in the Judeo-Christian (but not the Samaritan) traditions sex is the central metaphor - period. Second, sex is the ultimate motivation in life. It's what creates life, sustains life and not just human life - life life. If any of us had some opportunity to get laid we wouldn't be here. Third, it's better than using violent metaphors and I like developing analogies. So what's a bored, married allegorist supposed to do?
stephan huller is offline  
Old 01-18-2013, 12:39 PM   #103
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: On the path of knowledge
Posts: 8,889
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo the Clown-O View Post

Also – Anyone who capitalizes the letter l in the name El should be banned permanently, unless all surrounding characters in the sentence are also uppercase.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chili View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheshbazzar View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chili View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheshbazzar View Post
the bible tells us of the EL of israEL what a incredible EL above all of the ELohim was he.

is this enough to get me permanently banned? or does it take seven EL s?
I would write this just the other way around to read Is-ra-el and be one with god instead of worship him. And in case you wonder, his ears are on your own head and shouting is not needed.
Yes Chili, but it was for the writing of EL that Bingo the Clown-o wished to me banned,
so the Is-ra-el simply would not have worked.

Still waiting to see if I will get banned for not spelling here the way that the Clown-o wants me too.
Ah, good for you. I am just a casual observer and should really shut up.
Maybe about this. But be assured my dear friend Chili, that I'll continue to keep my eyes open for any insights you may present on other matters.
Do you remember that time long ago when I likened you to a bird? Ya been doing a really good 'job' old friend.
It just took me a long time to learn to properly appriciate it. Carry on.
Sheshbazzar is offline  
Old 01-18-2013, 12:44 PM   #104
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

Did I mention that Shesh is often annoying but basically tolerable?
stephan huller is offline  
Old 01-18-2013, 12:50 PM   #105
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: On the path of knowledge
Posts: 8,889
Default

Gee thanks! I tolerate you too.

Guess I might as well squeeze this into this post too
Quote:
Originally Posted by stepahn huller
in the Judeo-Christian (but not the Samaritan) traditions sex is the central metaphor - period.
You think?

Maybe from your perspective, but certainly not from mine. You get older you learn that sex really isn't everything.
Sheshbazzar is offline  
Old 01-18-2013, 12:52 PM   #106
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

Just trying to show a positive 'team spirit.'
stephan huller is offline  
Old 01-18-2013, 01:21 PM   #107
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheshbazzar View Post
הסוס דמן׃
Umm, shouldn't that be דמן הסוס?
spin is offline  
Old 01-18-2013, 01:43 PM   #108
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: On the path of knowledge
Posts: 8,889
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spin View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheshbazzar View Post
הסוס דמן׃
Umm, shouldn't that be דמן הסוס?
Then it should need be; הדמן הסוס

But it is the writer who writes what he writes, and the composer that composes what is composed.

I do not wish to express 'shit the-horse:' or 'the-horse the-shit:' but rather 'the-horse shit': = h'sooce domen:
(being the worthless dead shit of a dead horse at that) שקר הסוס לתשועה

הסוס דמן׃ can be understood, transliterated and translated, and it will stand.
Sheshbazzar is offline  
Old 01-18-2013, 01:46 PM   #109
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: USA, Missouri
Posts: 3,070
Default

OT, ignore
TedM is offline  
Old 01-18-2013, 02:39 PM   #110
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Bronx, NY
Posts: 945
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stephan huller View Post
And remember I am not really suggesting that the person that starts the thread becomes a moderator. Let me correct that if it is thought I said it. I just thought at the outset he could restrict who could participate in his thread. I only suggested that because I hate to ask Toto to split basically every comment from Pete, tanya, chili et al. But now that I think of it I guess I can bother him every five minutes or so. I just thought I was being charitable.
I don't think a poster should be able to decide who can post and who can't. If that's not a moderator in a strict sense, it's close enough for me.

What's seems fairest is to have a supergroup, all of whom can post to all threads. Others could post to supergroup threads subject to moderation.

I don't think this is very practical because it puts a lot of work on the moderators; but it's the fairest way I can think of if the complaints are to be accommodated.

I'm fine with leaving things the way they are. Besides the usual suspects, many thread's twists and turns are of no interest to me, but I don't have a problem scrolling past content-free material. There's no one on my ignore list.
Horatio Parker is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:15 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.