FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Science & Skepticism > Evolution/Creation
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-13-2007, 02:56 PM   #71
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In the dark places of the world
Posts: 8,093
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Constant Mews View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calvin's Catarrh View Post
The chinese sailed the indian ocean with 400' wooden vessels, that used no metal strapping. But the ark wasn't even a sailing ship, it was a floating box with no rudder, and it didn't even have to float in the ocean.
And again we see the highly selective response. Does anyone know if this is a consistent creationist pattern?
I've found that creationists and apologists for biblical literalism both have a high coward factor. They also have a high frequency of dishonesty, either through out-and-out quote mining, or by omission (pretending an argument hasn't been refuted a dozen times). Both are pretty surprising, when you consider their 'faith-based' approach to life. They also don't respect the search for knowledge; they both share a distrust of science and investigation in the first place.
Sauron is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:04 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.