|  | Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. | 
|  03-26-2004, 07:55 AM | #1 | 
| Veteran Member Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Chicago 
					Posts: 1,396
				 |  ivory pomegranate faked? 
			
			Sole First Temple relic may be a forgery  (Haaretz, 3/26/04).
		 | 
|   | 
|  03-26-2004, 08:07 AM | #2 | |
| Contributor Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: nowhere 
					Posts: 15,747
				 |  Re: Undisclosed sources: Lemaire's pomegranate a forgery Quote: 
 I think all 1st temple artefacts should be considered questionale now until proven otherwise! spin | |
|   | 
|  03-26-2004, 03:21 PM | #3 | 
| Contributor Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Barrayar 
					Posts: 11,866
				 |   
			
			Thanks, Apikorus. For everything.
		 | 
|   | 
|  03-26-2004, 05:31 PM | #4 | 
| Veteran Member Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Chicago 
					Posts: 1,396
				 |   
			
			The Israel Museum coughed up a lot of dough for the pomegranate.  Their antiquities director must be feeling rather queasy at the moment.
		 | 
|   | 
|  03-26-2004, 07:12 PM | #5 | |
| Contributor Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: nowhere 
					Posts: 15,747
				 |   Quote: 
 spin | |
|   | 
|  03-29-2004, 07:04 PM | #6 | 
| Veteran Member Join Date: Jul 2000 Location: rationalpagans.com 
					Posts: 7,400
				 |  ivory pomegranite faked? 
			
			(if this belongs somewhere else, please move--- this used to be the archaeology forum) http://www.haaretzdaily.com/hasen/spages/409140.html The only relic from Solomon's temple, on view in Israel since 1988, may be a fake by the same guys who did the Ossuary. just a FYI... | 
|   | 
|  03-29-2004, 07:56 PM | #7 | 
| Contributor Join Date: Jun 2000 Location: Los Angeles area 
					Posts: 40,549
				 |   
			
			Same topic here: {Deleted} | 
|   | 
|  03-29-2004, 07:59 PM | #8 | 
| Contributor Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: nowhere 
					Posts: 15,747
				 |   
			
			The article was cited a few days ago {Deleted} However it didn't raise much of a storm, though perhaps it should have. I guess people here are just to nt oriented, as a reaction to their rejection of xianity. -- Hey, Toto, stop sneaking in when I'm writing a response.  spin | 
|   | 
|  03-30-2004, 09:26 AM | #9 | 
| Veteran Member Join Date: Jul 2000 Location: rationalpagans.com 
					Posts: 7,400
				 |   
			
			sorry--- I had done a quick glance and missed this... This should be causing a fuss--- this is the definitive artifact that proved the time line of the OT, apparently. Without this, they are back to 'well, we think it happened'. However, at a minimum, when in a discussion re evolution and piltdown man is sited, we can counter with this--- both forgeries that do not discount the whole, although there is much less other than this to back the OT than there is for evo... Thanks for combining. | 
|   | 
|  03-30-2004, 10:41 AM | #10 | 
| Veteran Member Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Chicago 
					Posts: 1,396
				 |  outrageous action by moderators! 
			
			[TIC] Mods: if you are going to change the title of the thread but keep me listed as the "starter," I would appreciate it if you would avoid spelling errors. The proper spelling of the fruit in question is "pomegranate." Your actions have resulted in the appearance that I am a poor speller, which is a grievous injury to my reputation! My initial thread title may have been long and unwieldy, but I did spell "pomegranate" correctly. Huffily, Apikorus [/TIC] | 
|   | 
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread | 
| 
 |